HOME | DD
#1918 #kuk #naval #ww1 #austriahungary #easter #greetingcard #history #infantry #marines #reenactment #romania #ship #soldiers #easter2016
Published: 2016-04-30 13:01:07 +0000 UTC; Views: 7586; Favourites: 63; Downloads: 41
Redirect to original
Description
Happy Orthodox Easter!This year, the gap between the Catholic/Protestant Easter and the Orthodox one was especially pronounced, with the first one being on March 27 and the second on May the 1st.
Personally, I am an agnostic non believer, but that doesn't stop me in creating greeting cards for my reenactment group, "Traditia Militara"
This is a special picture because it depicts a lesser known episode in the history of World War one.
It takes place from the 29th October-to the 1st of December 1918, after the Armistice, and shows soldiers of the "Garda Nationala Romana" ("Romanian National Guard").
These were former soldiers of Romanian descent from the K.u.K III Seebatallion Pola (The Third Austro-Hungarian Marine Infantry Battalion, based in Pola, modern day Pula, in Croatia, itself a rather obscure unit, since it's largely overshadowed by the First Austro-Hungarian Marine Infantry Battalion based in Trieste, which say action in the Isonzo campaign) which organised to keep the peace after the naval base became part of the newly born (and very short lived) State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs and the Austrians and Hungarians were pulled back.
The new state got off to a pretty shaky start and inter-ethnic strife between Croats, Serbs and Slovenes was depressingly common, which is why it was deemed necessary to have foreign, neutral troops keeping the peace (a rather good idea, methinks, considering the "slight unpleasantness" that took place in the region from 1991 to 2001, commonly considered the deadliest European wars since WW2).
In any case, the situation was resolved barely one month afterwards, when the new state joined with the Kingdom of Serbia to create the new Kingdom of Yugoslavia (confusingly, also called the Kingdom of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs between 1918 and 1929), after which the Romanian troops were sent home, in mid-1919.
I'm using these uniforms for this year's Easter greeting card because this will be the uniforms my group will wear at the Verdun Centenary (26-30 May 2016). Initially we were supposed to come in Romanian WW1 uniforms, but at the last minute the organisers realised the cost of the commemorations far exceeded their budget, so they had to restrict participants to those that took part in the actual battle, namely French, German and Austro-Hungarian.
For us that's not that big of a problem, because there were plenty of ethnic Romanians in the Austro-Hungarian Army and which also saw action at Verdun, for example the K. und K. Infanterie-regiment nr. 51 "Klausenburg", from my native city of Cluj (Klausenburg in German and Kolozsvár in Hungarian).
Besides, this is the second Austrian regiment we reenact, because we also keep alive the traditions of the Grenzregiment n. 17 Siebenbürgisches- 2nd Walachen ( Transylvanian Military Border Regiment n. 17 - 2nd Wallachian) from Nasaud.
Interestingly, this picture and the commemoration at Verdun both tie in pretty closely with my family history -my great-grandfather, his two brothers and their cousin, ethnic Romanian from Transylvania were all drafted in the Austro Hungarian artillery at the start of the war and sent to the Italian Front, where they saw action in the Isonzo campaign up and including Caporetto, in 1917.
In May 1918, my great-grandfather and his cousin were moved with their unit to the Romanian front, at Marasesti. Unwilling to kill other Romanians, they planned to desert and switch sides to the Romanian army, but, before they could do so, Romania (at that point completely isolated after Russia's withdrawal from the conflict) was taken out of the war by the Treaty of Bucharest .
The war ended before they could be redeployed, so instead they joined the Romanian army after newly independent Transylvania joined the Kingdom of Romania, on the 1st of December, 1918.
They also saw action in the 1919 campaign against the Béla Kun's Hungarian Soviet Republic (May-August 1919).
In the meantime, my two great-granduncles were deployed to two different stations - one of them was sent to Verdun in late 1918 and saw about a month of action there before the end of the war saw him return to Romania, in late December 1918, while the other one was sent to Pola and became part of the "Garda Nationala Romana", coming back to Romania in July 1919, meaning he was the only one from the family not to see action in the 1919 Hungarian campaign.
A small note about equipment - the weird ammo pouches are Mannlicher M88 ammo pouches. They had been superceded in the use of the Army by the M1895 individual ammo pouches, which is why they ended up in use with the Marines.
The soldiers also have the uniform tunic and trousers that are distinctive to this particular unit (the Trieste Sebatallion, for example, had grey uniforms of the same cut as the infantry). The design is that of the regular sailor outfits, including the distinctive sailor collar, but with chest pockets added and in beige instead of white (summer) or dark blue (winter). The cap is the regular sailor cap in either white or blue depending on the time of the year and with a band which either states the name of the ship the seaman came from, or, in the case of soldiers moved in form other arms, or from on-shore postings simply said "K.u.K Kriegsmarine" (Austro-Hungarian Navy).
Other than that, the gear is pretty standard for the K.u.K. - Mannlicher M1895 rifle, haversack with the M.1899 mess kit, canvas bread bag, M.1888 steel enamelled canteen with cup, M1895 bayonet and frog and entrenching tool with leather carrier.
When it comes to the drawing I should also point out the blue logo just above the flag - that is the log of the European Union of Military-Historical Groups (UEWHG - Union der Europäischen Wehrhistorischen Gruppen ) of which my group is part since 2009.
Oh, and the ship on the horizon is the 1902 battleship "SMS Erzherzog Ferdinand Max", which was based at Pola in 1918, handed over to the newly formed State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs and later awarded as war reparations to Britain before being broken up for scrap in 1921.
Related content
Comments: 9
Arianod [2016-05-01 10:39:59 +0000 UTC]
Wow, I had no idea that the different churches had different calendars for Easter and all O_o Anyway, happy Easter to you!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wingsofwrath In reply to Arianod [2016-05-01 21:51:28 +0000 UTC]
Thanks!
Yeah, the Orthodox Church still uses the Julian Calendar, which is 13 days behind the Gregorian one. Factor in the fact Easter is always on a Sunday, and this year you get a massive difference.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
PivotShadow [2016-04-30 19:42:59 +0000 UTC]
"Initially we were supposed to come in Romanian WW1 uniforms, but a" Aw, it cuts off? You've got me interested now :/
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wingsofwrath In reply to PivotShadow [2016-04-30 22:28:11 +0000 UTC]
Ooops, missed that. Fixed!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PivotShadow In reply to wingsofwrath [2016-05-01 02:39:46 +0000 UTC]
Interesting! Makes you thankful for the fact that Austria-Hungary had a collection of ethnicities fron so many countries!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AlekVulken94 [2016-04-30 17:08:58 +0000 UTC]
Always loved the tone of brown used in Romanian uniforms during this period up until 1944.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wingsofwrath In reply to AlekVulken94 [2016-04-30 22:58:35 +0000 UTC]
Ah. Well, these uniforms are actually Austro-Hungarian, and this particular colour was only used by the Pola Seebatallion, no other unit.
During that time the colour of the Romanian army uniforms was grey - ( See here and here ).
The colour was changed to khaki (as you well note, it's more of a brown) in 1926, and that colour was kept until 1947 when King Michael was sent into exile and the Soviets took over and imposed soviet style uniforms.
Here is a picture showing the actual range of uniform colours during ww2. It was taken last year during a reenactment in Slovakia, in Stary Tekov. I'm third from the left and my uniform is probably the closest to what the regulations stipulate in terms of colour, but all of these variations would have been normal due to material shortages, especially late-war.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MrAverage [2016-04-30 15:43:01 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, as a Catholic with a lot of Orthodox friends, I always happen to note the difference - every seven years we have Easter WAYYY early. Lent starts at the beginning of February, and Easter is at the end of March. It has to do with the liturgical calendar having to rotate so that Easter always falls on a Sunday, and the disjuncture between the Gregorian and Julian calendars the two Patriarchates (Rome and Byzantium) decided to use to write their lists of holy days. Ahh... religion.
Totally unrelated to the subject and composition above (which is superb, by the way) I've always been fascinated by the Romanian language as an outlier in the region, having more in common with, say Italian and the other Romance languages of East-Latinate derivation than with Greco-Slavic language groups more common in Southeastern Europe. It's such a structurally beautiful language - probably closest (except for minority languages like Ladan and Romansh) to what modern Latin would sound like if the Western Roman Empire hadn't fallen.
Neither here nor there, just the sort of thing that interests me. Now English, and the West-Germanic groups - that's where we really got crazy.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wingsofwrath In reply to MrAverage [2016-05-01 00:31:01 +0000 UTC]
I'm not sure if it's religion that's the problem here or the Churches who didn't see eye to eye on things and decided to do things differently just to spite the other.
Personally, I think there should be a division between Faith, Religion and the Church, because those are very different things.
Faith, I feel is very normal for us humans - we are faced with an universe which functions on a completely different scale from our own puny lives, so it's only natural to think of that universe as alive, rational and possessing human traits. Now, wherever the traits we choose give us a vision of that universe being a single God or several entities and wherever those deities are fundamentally benevolent , indifferent or even malevolent, that's totally up to us, individually, and it should be up to us and us alone to decide which version best works with our view of the world.
One thing I'm quite certain of though, is the fact that, no matter which version we choose, it will be flawed and incorrect, because there's no way, we, as humans, can understand something that's far beyond our scope.
I get the idea of bringing together people who believe in very similar versions of God and how that can enhance one's life, but I think decreeing that "our" version of God is the only real one is taking it a little bit too far, because it will inevitably lead to violence with people that are just as convinced their slightly different version is actually the true one.
And then we have the Church, which, in my opinion, is nothing else than a 100% human made corporation whose goal is to impose one of those competing ideas of what God is on all the other people. It has little to do with God and all to do with amassing wealth and manipulating people, which is why I think we really could do without.
Faith, well, that's wholly up to us, but having some guys try and sell us (for a lot of money, especially if you're the Romanian Orthodox Church) the "only true version of God"... no thanks.
Of course, you are free to disagree with me because I believe being wrong comes with being human, so one must always entertain the notion one might be wrong this time.
Oddly enough, there is another romance language which is very similar to Romanian, even though it evolved separately - Catalan.
A lot of the words are different, but the way they are pronounced is very similar.
It's rather unclear how we ended up speaking a romance language, because, while it's true the Romans conquered Dacia in 106 AD, the same territory was then conquered by other peoples, some of which spoke languages which failed to leave any deeper impression than a few loanwords (Avars, Gepids, Ostrogoths, Visigoths, Vandals, Huns, Cumans, Mongols...), and others which then gave their languages to our neighbours, like the Slavs (came around 520 AD) and the Magyars (880 AD).
One theory is that most of the Latin/ proto-Romanian speaking population was clustered in villages up in the Carpathian Mountains and the other people only ever ruled the lowlands, but this is really only conjecture at this point.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
























