HOME | DD

Avapithecus — Revelations

#assassin #constantinople #creed #empire #firenze #galata #hookblade #istanbul #magnificent #ottoman #quote #revelations #suleiman #tower #turkish #yusuf #assassinscreed #ezio #auditore #tazim
Published: 2016-08-13 12:40:09 +0000 UTC; Views: 3966; Favourites: 35; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description

The Ottomans first popped up as a major power in the history books in 1302, after Sultan Osman I and his army victoriously beat the Byzantines at the Battle of Bapheus.  And ever since, the Ottomans had become the sworn enemies of the Templar-influenced Byzantines.  Over the next 150 years, the Ottomans grew unbelievably strong and influential, and in 1453 Sultan Mehmet II and his forces finally annihilated every last trace of the Byzantine Empire after claiming their capital at Constantinople.  The Ottomans then moved their capital to the city, and renamed it Istanbul.  Why they changed it, I can't say.  People just liked it better that way.  After that, Istanbul exploded as the center of culture and trade for all of Eurasia.  Thousands of people from all over the known world flocked to the city, especially since the Ottomans, by both tradition and law, were respectful and tolerant of all creeds and cultures.  Muslims, Christians, Jews, Romanis, all were welcome.  As you can imagine, this made the Ottomans really good friends with the Assassins, who soon recovered from the purge set upon them by the Byzantine Templars.


The Assassins wormed their way deep into the Ottoman culture, helping them slay their enemies and the Templars helping them.  A famous example is when the Turkish Assassin Mentor, Ishak Pasha, led his army into Wallachia in 1476 and defeated and killed the tyrannical Templar ruler, Vlad Tepes, better known as Vlad the Impaler.  However, this would cause the Assassin, Vali cel Tradat, to betray the order due to his admiration of the Impaler.  Nonetheless, the Assassins carried on strongly throughout the Ottoman Empire.


Another famous Assassin story from Ottoman history actually starts back in Italy.  In 1509, after sending Cesare Borgia to his end, the legendary Mentor, Ezio Auditore da Firenze, found a letter from his father to his uncle, detailing his discovery of Altaïr’s Library underneath Masyaf Castle, a hidden chamber full of invaluable wisdom.  Ezio decided to take up the quest to find the Library, and arrived in Masyaf in March 1511.  However, Ezio discovered that it had been taken over by the scrambling remains of what was the Byzantine Empire: the Templar kind of remains.  Ezio fought them off and found the Library, but found it locked behind a door that required five special keys.  And so, Ezio traveled to Istanbul in May and met the local Assassins there, including Yusuf Tazim, the leader of the Turkish branch of the Brotherhood.


Over the next few months, Ezio met and worked with several valuable allies, such as the famous Prince Suleiman (who later later become the legendary Sultan Suleiman “The Magnificent”), the Prince's uncle Ahmet, the Assassin Piri Reis, and a beautiful young bookstore owner named Sofia Sartor, who would eventually become Ezio’s lover.  They all aided Ezio in finding the Masyaf keys across Istanbul, and he found that each key was actually an Isu relic that Altaïr had used to imprint his most important life memories onto.  During his quest, Ezio also worked to eliminate the Byzantine conspirators, such as Manuel Palaiologos and Shahkulu.


He eventually learned that Ahmet himself had thrown in with the Templars, and the Prince stole Ezio’s keys with the intent of using them for his own power.  Ezio gave chase with Sofia, and cornered Ahmet in the countryside.  After being rescued by Suleiman’s father, Sultan Selim (who killed Ahmet), Ezio and Sofia took the keys back to Masyaf in 1512, and opened the Library.  Within, Ezio found only the skeleton of Altaïr, and the Apple of Eden that had been hidden away.  Ezio left the Apple behind, believing it best if it stayed underground, but not before he uncovered a message from the Precursor, Jupiter, to an unknown phantom simply called “Desmond”.  Ezio then officially retired from the Assassins, believing his work was done and that it was time to settle down at last.  He and Sofia returned to Italy, got married, and had two smiling children.  Ezio died peacefully in Florence in 1524.


The Ottoman Empire remained a major power for centuries, reaching its peak in politics and cultural diversity after Suleiman became Sultan in 1520.  Suleiman realized that the only way to keep the land stable was to allow the people to be free to live their lives as they wished to live them.  And so, with the help of his Assassin friends, he brought the Empire into a golden age that lasted throughout his 50 years as Sultan.  The Empire remained a major power until the Allied Powers took it over during World War I, and the Empire was fully disbanded in 1923.  What remained of the territory became what is today the country of Turkey.

Related content
Comments: 29

Historyman14 [2018-01-29 14:38:48 +0000 UTC]

Oh boy....

There was so many issues with Revelations. I'll never forgive them for making the Byzantines cartoonish villains. Painfully annoying. There was some serious historical bias going on in the story.

The way how Ezio told Manuel Palaeologos that his attempts to bring back a dying empire was lamentable was itself quite hypocritical—considering the East Romans were fighting to bring independence for their people,and that he himself fought to resurrect a dying order.

AND EZIO BLEW UP A CITY. KILLING WHO KNOWS HOW MANY EASTERN ROMANS. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Avapithecus In reply to Historyman14 [2018-01-29 15:37:55 +0000 UTC]

Dang.  Revelations is my favorite in the Ezio trilogy XD It's the only one where I feel a true connection to all the characters and the world.  Yeah it has its problems but I feel like everything else was so good it kinda overshadows it Like the most I can say for Cappadocia is at least he told his contacts to start evacuating the city to at least try to protect them, but yeah even I can't really defend that XD

I feel like the Byzantine thing as a whole makes sense though :V Ezio was trying to revive a Brotherhood, an organization, whereas Palaiologos was trying to rebuild an empire, one who's legacy was built on destruction and tyranny at the end of its life.  It's a bit different I feel.

I dunno.  I love the game, but that's just me XD I wanna go to Istanbul now

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Historyman14 In reply to Avapithecus [2018-01-29 15:50:53 +0000 UTC]

The thing with Constantinople was...not so great. 

Buildings are copy-pasted all over the place, more than usual. Even landmark buildings with database entries are copy paste, some buildings are in the wrong place and the research is extremely lacking overall compared to the other games in the series. We don't even get to explore the entire city!


The same goes for Suleiman. 

While Revelations had him pretty accurate. ( Amazing, brilliant young man with the game taking great pains to say he has a bright future ahead of him.) They went overboard and gave him too much   praised and venerated.

While Suleiman was one of, if not the greatest Sultan of the Ottoman Empire, he wasn't exactly a saint. When Suleiman took the throne he got involved in several wars of conquest against his neighbors. Hell, he had two of his own sons murdered.

The problem with that is that they barely make a distinction between the fake Byzantines and the real ones.


Ezio also killed a lot of civilians storming the Arsenal in Constantinople too.  

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Avapithecus In reply to Historyman14 [2018-01-29 15:56:39 +0000 UTC]

In Suleiman's defense, it was the law to have his sons killed It was part of an Ottoman defense against wars of succession.  There's a whole Extra Credits series about him that I really like.  It goes into depth about his sort of inner tragedies and how he was struggling to lift up a world that was collapsing around him: m.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL…

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Historyman14 In reply to Avapithecus [2018-01-29 16:04:31 +0000 UTC]

I do love the  Extra Credits. 

Either way, on one hand, the  the villainization of the Templars, and really the whole Medieval Christian Establishment, is entirely in keeping with the first game's themes-- these power structures have ulterior motives, obscured by their conspicuous pretensions of piety. (You can't really be surprised by it, when you look at the first game as having come out within Kingdom of Heaven and The Da Vinci Code.) 

But on the other the first game (As much of a prototype it was.)  did an extremely good job at portraying both sides as morally questionable. The entire point of the first game is that Altair starts questioning his mentor, his Brotherhood and starts thinking why it is he is killing the people he is killing. Not all the Crusaders are portrayed as bad, and not all of the Muslims are portrayed as good, Richard the Lionheart being an example.

The Ezio (As much Ezio was the greatest Assassin of all time.) games lost this, and it didn't really come back again until AC3. Revelations being particularly bad at this as it doesn't just portray the Templars, or the Borgia as bad and the Assassins as good, but the Ottomans as good and the Christians under their yoke as bad. It almost feels like a parody of the interesting morality of the first game.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Avapithecus In reply to Historyman14 [2018-01-29 16:12:00 +0000 UTC]

I feel like I'm not really qualified to discuss this since I have an inherent anti-Templar bias XD I like all the games for their own reasons.  Even Syndicate, which I hate for so many reasons, was at least a fun gameplay experience XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Historyman14 In reply to Avapithecus [2018-02-05 16:26:54 +0000 UTC]

I can under stand your anti-Templar bias, but you really have to look at it.
 
In Revelations you've got the Templars who are, once the Palaiologi are out of the way, seeking to create a stable society via questionable means. Arguably the end goal is noble even if the route there is horridly out of bounds. In comparison, you've got the Assassins who are opposing them simply because that's what they do.

In AC3, the Templar are the most grey and beloved we ever seen them.  Heck, up till  Haytham says "The Father of Understanding guides us" they are virtually indistinguishable from the Assassins, which is pretty much the point. (Charles Lee besides.) Heck, the USA would have done fine under Haytham influence.  

In Black Flag, you've got the Templars who, once more via horrid means, seek to create a borderless society where empires are made irrelevant and are up against pirates. Our protagonist, Edward Kenway,  is a man who took pride in robbing and killing people to make himself richer and was willing to sell an artefact of such immense power just so he could retire and live the good life. He only eventually comes around when his lifestyle choices nearly get him killed, most of his friends die, and his little political side project goes up in flames.

In Unity, the Assassins are the Templar. (AKA: All the rich nobles.) . They failed to reform the Kingdom of France, and in fact push back earlier reforms, leading to the Revolution. They failed to save the King, and any chance of a  constitutional monarchy. Raging fanaticism by both sides (Mosley Assassins.) killed the hopes of a long term truce, and peace. The Reign of Terror was pretty much their fault. The Paris Assassins was pretty much fine with letting France burn in their little holdlouts, with the Templar in fact doing soem good. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Avapithecus In reply to Historyman14 [2018-02-05 17:07:47 +0000 UTC]

I don't think it's fully fair to say the Reign of Terror was the Assassins fault when the entire chaos was literally planned by the Templar Grand Master in an attempt to scare Europe into submission XD Germain was a pretty heartless dude.

And as for Haytham, even he openly admits in his journal that the Templar way just isn't sustainable over a long period of time due to the corruptive nature of power.  He practically let Connor kill him because he realized he had become just as cruel as the men he slaughtered in his youth like Braddock and Birch.

Even though I don't like the Templars and their ideology, I still understand where they're coming from.  It's just not really for me personally XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Historyman14 In reply to Avapithecus [2018-02-05 18:39:09 +0000 UTC]

Your right about the Reign of Terror not their fault, but the Parisian Brotherhood had their heads in the ground/up their ass the whole Freach Revolution. They treated Arno like a 5 year old while he did more for them then anyone else, like saving them form Pierre Bellec plan take over. (And they kick him out without thinking of the risks it could bring them, or even let him tell of Germain's plans. Like, did none of them think of Arno possibly  turning over to the Templar to deal with both them, and Germain? Same happen with Shay and look how well that ended up for Achilles and the orignal Colonial Brotherhood.)

Germain was not really a Templar pre-say. He was just using the power of Grand Master Templar carry to get payback for kicking him out, what happen to Jacques de Molay, and his own personal power plays with the Isu/First Civilization. 

In the end of the day, the Templar and their normal end goals are horrible and the Assassins are the best hope, but as  Arno said it...

"The Creed is a warning. Ideals too easily give way to dogma. Dogma becomes fanaticism. No higher power sits in judgement of us. No supreme being watches to punish us for our sins. In the end, only we ourselves can guard against our obsessions. Only we can decide whether the road we walk carries too high a toll." 

As did Ezio and Altaïr ....

 "Liberty can be messy, Ahmet. But it is priceless." 

"When I was very young, I was foolish enough to believe that our Creed would bring an end to all these conflicts. If only I had possessed the humility to say to myself, I have seen enough for one life. I have done my part. Then again, there is no greater glory than fighting to find the truth."

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Avapithecus In reply to Historyman14 [2018-02-05 19:31:59 +0000 UTC]

Yeah the Paris council was some of the dumbest writing in the series thus far XD Even I can't defend how sloppy that story arch was.  I understand why they did it, they just didn't pull off the story they wanted to tell very well.  Like I said before, they should've just stuck to the previous games' formula and used history as a tool to craft the story and characters, rather then just having it be a backdrop for Assassins and Templars to do their own separate thing.  If it were me writing it, I would've made it a sort of Animal Farm story, with the fight for power on both sides making them go mad and have Arno be the hero who has to overcome it all and bring it back together on his own.  Kinda like how Connor realized he couldn't rely on anyone except the common people themselves because the mere position of representing the people can be a corruptive force.

In Mirabeau's words: "To administer is to govern, and to govern is to reign.  That is the essence of the problem."

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Historyman14 In reply to Avapithecus [2018-02-06 01:50:20 +0000 UTC]

Unity did try to mix and subvert with the normal positions of the Assassins and Templars (Assassins the Royalists and Nobles who failed to save, and reform the monarchy, and the Templar kicking off the Revolution if only by Germain and both sides in the chaos of the Revolution.), but drop the ball with  a ton more stuff. 

Your idea works well, like with Eizo as well in rebuilding the Brotherhood and keeping the renaissance alive in Italy. (As I would have guillotine the lot of the Paris council.) 

Poor, poor Mirabeau. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Avapithecus In reply to Historyman14 [2018-02-06 14:09:02 +0000 UTC]

Unity's problem with me is that it didn't really utilize its setting very well Tons of major events got crammed into side missions that had almost nothing to do with the story, like the Women's March.  Heck, the death of Jean Paul Marat got sidelined into some dull murder mystery mission XD Most of the main targets weren't even historical figures and a lot of the story just feels completely separated from what's happening in the world itself.  It feels like they either just expect you to know everything about the time period already or they just assume you'll read the databases and take that as enough.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Historyman14 In reply to Avapithecus [2018-02-06 15:43:55 +0000 UTC]

And they kill Elise!

I mean, Arno's life goal was to seek redemption and be with Elise. Did he get redeemed? No. A fallen rock stopped him from redeeming himself. And Elise? Dead. Dead, dead, dead.

We spend the whole game getting attached to her and Arno's relationship with her, literally the whole game, and she's killed off in the end in the stupidest way ever? What's the point? Seriously?

Pretty much every important death in the series made lot's of sense for character development. Cristina's death in ACB freed up Ezio for Caterina Sforza and Sofia, as well as most importantly a reflection on his life and what he was doing with it. Maria's death made Altair plunge himself into studying the Apple and the Assassin Brotherhood, paving the way for the events of Revelations and the whole Juno arc. Mary Read's death in Black Flag kicked Edward into his redemption arc, which was utterly awesome.  Bayek's son Khemu death lead him to go on a roaring rampage of revenge on the Order of the Ancients while Aya help Cleopatra, leading to the Hidden Ones. 

The Freach Revolution was a perfect setting for AC short of the Middle Ages, or stuff in Asia. But they drop the ball in  a ton of ways, making it background sound if nothing else, as you said the most famous events turn into sidequests/Co-Op Missions, or even sidelined. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Avapithecus In reply to Historyman14 [2018-02-06 16:10:37 +0000 UTC]

Well the Élise thing I actually understand.  Arno's "redemption" was actually a story about letting go, about realizing that he's only human and can only do so much.  Élise's death was kinda that extra push he needed to finally realize nothing will bring back their fathers or his lover, and that instead of letting that protectiveness blind him, he needed to look forward to saving the world in their name.

I think this cute little bit of fanart sums it up pretty well:
i.pinimg.com/564x/8b/70/84/8b7…

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Halkras12 [2017-05-02 22:22:27 +0000 UTC]

its too bad to suleiman acted like a templar,
60-70 years old suleiman,killed his biggest own son and granson because of the throne,h3 thought him son will kill his father but actually not

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Avapithecus In reply to Halkras12 [2017-05-02 22:30:35 +0000 UTC]

Well, his sons may not have been fit for the throne.  Under Suleiman's rule the Empire had a very peaceful and culturally diverse peak and a lot of citizens wanted to keep that ease.  A lot of the other nobles in Suleiman's court didn't much care for his tolerant policies and would've liked to seen them abolished.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Halkras12 In reply to Avapithecus [2017-05-02 22:33:50 +0000 UTC]

the satan snake named "hurrem" makes suleiman bad guy because shes a termplar
but only mahir-e devran sultan,him sister hadice sultan,her mother,him best friend "pargala ibrahim" makes suleiman good guy,

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Avapithecus In reply to Halkras12 [2017-05-02 22:37:39 +0000 UTC]

Unfortunately I'm not as well-versed in Turkish history as I wish I was I only know the basics of Suleiman's reign and based on what I've seen, all the cultural booms and tolerance in the Empire well outways any family drama he had going on

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Halkras12 In reply to Avapithecus [2017-05-02 23:06:11 +0000 UTC]

i dont know american or eourope history too much 😄😄😄

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Avapithecus In reply to Halkras12 [2017-05-02 23:10:42 +0000 UTC]

Lol, it gets pretty tragic and dramatic and messy...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Halkras12 In reply to Avapithecus [2017-05-03 08:36:31 +0000 UTC]

yup

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CowgirlsOfCanada [2017-01-11 00:40:50 +0000 UTC]

It took me way to long to notice Ezio in the background XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Avapithecus In reply to CowgirlsOfCanada [2017-01-11 01:15:24 +0000 UTC]

XD He's hiding in plain sight

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CowgirlsOfCanada In reply to Avapithecus [2017-01-11 01:28:43 +0000 UTC]

Kind like every thing I own

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Avapithecus In reply to CowgirlsOfCanada [2017-01-11 01:37:26 +0000 UTC]

Same

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Kimberly-SC [2016-08-22 19:09:50 +0000 UTC]

Yusuf!!!
Ezio seems to be too old for this fun
Nice picture and cool face expression of Yusuf

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Avapithecus In reply to Kimberly-SC [2016-08-22 19:12:12 +0000 UTC]

XD lol Poor Ezio
Thanks ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Kimberly-SC In reply to Avapithecus [2016-08-31 22:41:11 +0000 UTC]

Getting old is no fun XD
No problem

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Avapithecus In reply to Kimberly-SC [2016-09-01 00:00:07 +0000 UTC]

XD No fun at all

👍: 0 ⏩: 0