HOME | DD
DinoHunter2 β AT: Thing vs Thing
Published: 2010-12-30 20:35:20 +0000 UTC; Views: 4422; Favourites: 93; Downloads: 53
Redirect to original
Description
An Art Trade with , The Thing 1951 vs The Thing 1982.Sorry about the cruddy textures... my scanner doesn't do well with orange for some reason. It looks better in person. >_>
Related content
Comments: 43
π: 0 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 0
I prefer the 50s Thing to win since the 80s thing is shown to only assimilate animals (the 50s Thing is plant-based)
π: 1 β©: 0
Oh my god, I love this picture. I personally side with 1982 Thing for the fight but I love the idea and the art.
π: 0 β©: 0
i love the 3 movies of the thing butt the first ist very funny, very good job :3
π: 0 β©: 0
Excellent job! I'd have to give this one to John Carpenter's Thing.
π: 0 β©: 0
The Thing from 1951 as always been my favorite while the 1982 version has always disgusted and made me sick inside and out, but it is interesting that if theseΒ two meet and fought to the death to see who comes out on top, I bet the James Arness version would kick the crap out of the Wilford Brimley version.
Β
I give it 2 thumbs up and 5 stars!
Β
P.S. if you want to, could you make one with The Fly 1958 vs. The Fly 1986?
Β
Β
π: 0 β©: 1
Thanks very much! Fly vs Fly would be a pretty neat image.
π: 0 β©: 1
You said it and Your welcome!
π: 0 β©: 0
Shoulda done F4 Thing vs. one on the left. Woulda been hard to absorb him.
π: 0 β©: 0
funny this would've never happened anyway you do realize john carpenter's film wasn't a remake exactly. it was closer to the original book "Who goes there?" Written by john Campbell in 1935. in the book it refers the monster as the thing but also describes it more to the 1982 one " A Aggressive Alien Life form that Absorbs and Assimilates Cells and can gain memories thoughts from those it absorbs and can look identical to the original, also when threatened it would rapidly mutate into other organisms it had absorbed into and attack anything that gets in it's way." in fact all the character's names in the 1982 movie are the same characters from the book including Blair as well. only thing different really was more of the ship was shown in the book and the dogs' had names. well the yea huskies that turned into that gruesome thing in your picture.. i remember when i saw that scene the first time i never went to sleep that night i just stared at my dog and hope it wasn't infected too. XD
π: 0 β©: 0
Oh my god I love it. I actually drew a picture like this a long time ago.
Just for kicks and giggles I'd love to see Marvel's THE THING in the background looking confused.
π: 0 β©: 1
I actually thought of that a few times, haha. If it had been part of the request I might have thrown him in there too.
π: 0 β©: 0
No problem, and thanks! I'm glad you like it.
π: 0 β©: 1
Anything you want me to draw?
π: 0 β©: 1
Yeah, I already left my request on your page, it was a reply to you asking for this.
π: 0 β©: 1
Where? I cant find it.
π: 0 β©: 1
[link]
Scroll all the way down, should be there.
π: 0 β©: 1
OK, I see them
π: 0 β©: 0
IT'S A THING!
IT'S A THING!
IT'S... ANOTHER THING!
Freakin' awesome, DH. You should really do more pics like this, of more obscure monsters that is. This turned out epic. LOVE IT!
π: 0 β©: 0
I just hope the don't screw up the new Thing movie.
π: 0 β©: 1
Ever read the original novella that inspired both films?
π: 0 β©: 0
Yeah, who am I trying to kid with my foolish "optimism".
π: 0 β©: 1
O.G. Thing wins based on it's movie being far more awesome. Just one shmucks opinion.
π: 0 β©: 1
and one I concur with.
π: 0 β©: 1
I whole heartedly love both films and the novella that inspired them.
Fun note, the story had FAR more in common with Carpenters rendition.
π: 0 β©: 0
1982 Thing pwns all... only because its so unbeatable. I mean, lord, it copys life forms >,<
π: 0 β©: 0