HOME | DD
exizt β CMAR / G8A1
by-nc-nd
#3d #3dmodeling #firearms #military #mjm #rifle #weapondesign #mjm_design #mjmdesign
Published: 2013-04-25 17:39:10 +0000 UTC; Views: 32903; Favourites: 686; Downloads: 617
Redirect to original
Description
Updated Rifle Concept sheet from 2012Erstellt 2012. Habe das Konzept ein bisschen verbessert bzw. Fehler entfernt wo ich sie gefunden habe.
Related content
Comments: 40
I doesn't remember. I combined a few methods. Must be a modified cartoon render.
π: 0 β©: 0
Someday, I will have this beautiful thing made.
Then I will make it tacticool.
π: 0 β©: 1
Tacticool, operator style!
π: 0 β©: 1
Taping binoculars to upper receiver to make it tacticool. Also adding three lasers, predator style, makes it extra operator friendly.
π: 0 β©: 0
Sure it can be build. The measures and parts would work.
π: 0 β©: 1
Is the ejection system be swapped for left hand ejection?
π: 0 β©: 1
No, theres a regular ejection on the right side.
π: 0 β©: 1
Is this your own design? Do you do commissions?
π: 0 β©: 1
Yes, its my design.
Maybe I take a commissions, depends on what I have to do.
π: 0 β©: 0
Less Recoil means more accuracy badass weapon
π: 0 β©: 0
This is so amazing. I love this style. Very, very good work, congratulations.
π: 0 β©: 1
Looks cool!
A couple of practical points, though:
- With short bullpups, I worry about getting the hand too near the muzzle or muzzle brake. I'd prefer some sort of a "stop" on the front stock to ensure the shooter knows where his hand is.
- You should really be able to field strip a combat weapon with NO tools. A latch somewhere that allows removing a piece, and removing the first piece allows removing the next one etc.
π: 0 β©: 1
Thanks for posting!
We already have a kind of stopper behind the lower rail. Skilled/trained operators wouldnΒ΄t make the mistake to touch the wrong weapon part
We also need no tools for fieldstrip. If you look at the picture and the discription, you see the holding bolts, wich can be pulled out with your hands.
π: 0 β©: 1
Ah... I mis-interpreted your term "bolts" then. I tend to associate "bolt" with something that is threaded in place, and that means tools if you want to keep it low profile.
The only bullpup that I'm really familiar with is the AUG with 20" barrel, and the fore grip is almost impossible to miss, whether vertical or horizontal.
π: 0 β©: 0
Now that's a good looking design dude
π: 0 β©: 0
Excellent concept weapon, the attention to practical details and the detailed description really add a lot to the whole presentation.
π: 0 β©: 1
I'm partially color blind so I literally can't see the top rifle view very well from the lack of contrast. Could you modify it so it's easier to see?
π: 0 β©: 1
Maybe you can see this one better
[link]
π: 0 β©: 0
I like this piece a lot. It's a really good design. The only thing I would want to address is to extend the top rail back a few more inches. Have to remember the shooter's cheek rest will only be up as far as equal to the chamber, so a bit more room for optics and the like wouldn't be a bad idea. Other than that, this design is perfect. It's chambered in a really good round. The 6.8mm SPC is the bridge-gapper, so to speak.
Anyway. Good job.
π: 0 β©: 1
Hi and thank you for your post!
I think the point with the rail position isnt that easy. First, I dont use measures during modeling, so I have to evaluate the scale. Next thing, the rail or optic position, is also a personal thing of the shooter. To get a feeling for the right measures or position, I use my owne service rifles as reference. The optics and sights are on the same line like the grip. I think thats a good clue and absolutly functional and appropriate for holo- or ironsights, no matter if you shooting with or without body armour.
π: 0 β©: 1
Actually, the only reason I make mention of this is for the co-witnessing of the rear BUIS compared to the holo. If your front BUIS, holo and then the rear BUIS are too close, you have a lowered field of view, even if you were to use the long-range peep on the rear iron sight. Bring it back three or four extra slots and that is alleviated. But, anyway.
Who'd you serve with, my friend?
π: 0 β©: 1
Could be possible, but its hard to say, if you donΒ΄t could hold it in your hands.
Service Rifle is a G36 or G3.
π: 0 β©: 1
True. But, I also use the current Tavor as the baseline of comparison, to be honest. They brought it back all the way to the mid-line of the ejection port for more optical capabilities. I guess it's just a trade off.
π: 0 β©: 0
Looks like a bastard of a Styer AUG and a FAMAS.
π: 0 β©: 0
Great concept with the field stripping. This looks very crisp for a rifle. I like it!
π: 0 β©: 0
wow * A * how did you get that look??? dgjdjkf looks so awesome ahhhh envies youuu
π: 0 β©: 1
You put a lot of thought into the design and presentation of your weapon, and I applaud you greatly for that.
π: 0 β©: 0
