HOME | DD

JamesE82 In reply to ??? [2018-03-15 09:12:07 +0000 UTC]

  May I ask just what about the picture did it for you?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xXxWolfPackLeaderxXx In reply to JamesE82 [2018-03-15 13:00:32 +0000 UTC]

The legs the ass and the tits

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JamesE82 In reply to J-money117 [2016-12-31 06:49:13 +0000 UTC]

Can you imagine how long a set of legs a nine-footer would have?   And while the Crimson Conservative is as vain about her feet as the rest of her, better remember to look, but don't touch.

Thanks for taking the time to comment!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

J-money117 In reply to JamesE82 [2016-12-31 06:54:16 +0000 UTC]

It's got my mind a racin.

And as for your warning... It's taking a lot of willpower to keep that in mind. The idea of imagining all the ways this titanic beauty could kill me with her pinky finger is barely Enough to keep me from kissing and tickling her pinky toe. XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JamesE82 In reply to Miss-Jadis [2016-08-22 04:38:55 +0000 UTC]

Oh, does she ever: the Crimson Conservative was a buxom bombshell before she was forcibly transformed into a muscular supersoldier, and still has that mindset.  She doesn't always realize people are looking at her not because she's sexy, but because she has a Gatling gun in each hand and a huge backpack full of ammo.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Miss-Jadis In reply to JamesE82 [2016-08-22 04:41:44 +0000 UTC]

Being a spy/assassin I wouldn't wouldn't find the gatling gun all that strange, without bullets yes, but sometimes you just need a weapon that'll handle the mission.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JamesE82 In reply to Miss-Jadis [2016-08-22 04:55:11 +0000 UTC]

Handle the mission, level an entire Kazakhstani village full of terrorists when she was only sent there to kill one guy... all in a day's work for the Crimson Conservative.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Miss-Jadis In reply to JamesE82 [2016-08-22 04:56:31 +0000 UTC]

Niiiiice

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JamesE82 In reply to Miss-Jadis [2016-08-22 05:01:48 +0000 UTC]

The State Department doesn't think so.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Miss-Jadis In reply to JamesE82 [2016-08-22 05:02:25 +0000 UTC]

Officials.... blah blah yadda yadda

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RajThePrince In reply to RioterOne [2016-03-15 16:00:22 +0000 UTC]

yes! 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JamesE82 In reply to Kmon13 [2014-09-04 15:49:25 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, but the saying isn’t that bad, is it?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Kmon13 In reply to JamesE82 [2014-09-04 20:27:20 +0000 UTC]

Nope it hilarious.  

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JamesE82 In reply to andrewr255 [2014-09-04 15:47:50 +0000 UTC]

I agree with everything you say, and take pride in behaving like a gentleman (especially by the slovenly standards of modern society). These women remind me of the celebrities who made a huge fuss about paparazzi after the death of Lady Di; entertainment reporters and photographers said, “Really? We killed Lady Di, and you want us to leave you alone? You got it!” It was a beautiful thing, because mere moments later…

Pay attention to me! Pay attention to meeeeeee!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JamesE82 In reply to Paudraic [2014-09-04 15:43:53 +0000 UTC]

Really?

That’s right; it’s radio, and I invented everything on the radio! Hoo-hoo!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JamesE82 In reply to Soviet-Superwoman [2014-09-04 15:42:11 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for sharing your experiences, which was what I wanted. Guys just like me “lonely, socially-defunct men” can behave like that anywhere, and I am not a fan of it, of course; touch a woman with a body part against her will, and as far as I am concerned, it is up to the woman if the man gets said body part back in functioning order.

Apparently the big cons already have strict rules about harassment, and it sounds like they are enforced, so I just can’t help but wonder if this is an excuse to inject a tentacle of the irrational branch of feminism into yet another area it is not welcome. I just get the same feeling from them as I get from the bimbos who sued Girls Gone Wild for simply capturing what they themselves chose to do in public; I’ll never grope a woman (I hope that goes without saying!), but if you’re dressed like Lady Death or Power Girl and have the body to match? Hey, I’m lookin’.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Soviet-Superwoman In reply to JamesE82 [2014-09-04 18:35:20 +0000 UTC]

Well, I honestly don't put you anywhere in the same category as some of the guys at these conventions. You might have a super-hero shirt on, but I imagine you as being well-dressed, clean and having a keen sense of how to behave in public. These are folks that have shown up in clothing sewed together from the Superman sheets they had as a child or who argue with artist for more than ten minutes about Poison Ivy's hair color. I'm not a big fan of extreme feminism at all. That woman Anita Sarkeesian for example makes me roll my eyes and want to laugh in her face. Having said that though I don't think this is a conspiracy, it's a fact of what happens when you have a beautiful woman dressed like Power Girl in a room full of guys, some of which have no idea how to react responsibly when presented with their "dream girl". Looking is fine, tasteful compliments and asking for photo-ops are all cool, but acting like a creep isn't and sadly it does happen.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JamesE82 In reply to Soviet-Superwoman [2014-09-04 21:26:07 +0000 UTC]

Those are some interesting examples, and I’ll bet ya got a million of ‘em. Sarkeesian rings a bell; seem to recall her being so stupid and unreasonable that some America-hating atheist dedicated a lot of time to ripping into her.

And thanks, it means a lot that I don’t come off as the icky type of antisocial hermit. If I ever see Coco Austin dressed as the Warlord, however, all bets are off. (Didn‘t you say she should play Yuri in the movie once?)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Soviet-Superwoman In reply to JamesE82 [2014-09-04 22:31:35 +0000 UTC]

Sarkeesian is a feminist who sees video games as a genre for the persecution and victimization of women. Her work is very skewed and she obviously gets her blood up when talking about it. I don't agree with the folks that threatened to kill her or blow up her home, but she is an angry woman full of angry, misconstrued ideas about gender equality. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anita_Sa…

I do think she would be perfect as newly-resurrected Yuri BTW.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JamesE82 In reply to Stick-bag [2014-09-04 15:31:46 +0000 UTC]

Yup, and the left obliged Rush by giving him just the reaction he wanted.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Stick-bag In reply to JamesE82 [2014-09-04 19:32:02 +0000 UTC]

Of course... >_<

Reminds me of UKIP. Except the stupid things they keep saying aren't planned (I think) and the members who say them tend to "resign" afterwards.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JamesE82 In reply to Stick-bag [2014-09-04 19:41:18 +0000 UTC]

I’ll have to look UKIP up, but what was stupid about a little bit of wordplay aimed at people who notoriously can’t handle being joked about? Should straight men never talk about body parts they find attractive?

I’m not trying to start a fight--I just don’t get it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Stick-bag In reply to JamesE82 [2014-09-04 21:10:20 +0000 UTC]

The UK Independence Party. Seems like every other month there's a story about one of its members saying something racist, sexist or homophobic.

I'm not getting up in arms about it, it's really more of a "urgh, really? You're going there? " thing. I just get exasperated with people saying controversial things for publicity. It's one thing to accidentally let things slip, but it's another to say stuff just to stir things and get people riled up.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JamesE82 In reply to Stick-bag [2014-09-04 21:20:20 +0000 UTC]

I think Rush is at the point where he doesn’t need to get attention from the general public, but when it comes to saying things to get targeted sections of the populace riled…

Ain’t I a stinker?

Judging by her clothing choices lately, looks like that is one area where Rush and the Crimson Conservative differ, though.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JamesE82 In reply to Levia-the-Dragon [2014-09-04 15:30:15 +0000 UTC]

The great thing about having over twenty million listeners every week is, Rush doesn’t have to censor himself to cater to people who already hate him; anyone who would think that harmless little joke was even approaching douchy is one of those people, and he has the luxury of not bothering to try to reach people he knows will never accept his beliefs.

Was it really formed for those reasons? The more I learn about them, the more I think they (or their leadership, anyway) are just the whiney, entitled little girls my gut told me they were. There are too many of the “Look at my titties/how dare you look at my titties!” types out there who need to realize that if you walk around in little more than a bikini, people will react to you as if you are wearing little more than a bikini, because you are wearing little more than a bikini. And from what I’ve read, Comic-Con and the other big gatherings already have very strict sexual harassment rules in place already, so .

For the record, while I shouldn’t even have to say this, of course I know men do inappropriate things when attractive women are around; they should be dealt with in the proper manner so the women will not feel upset or uncomfortable, which are emotional states I am certainly not a fan of them being in, no matter how they dress.

P.S.: You’re talking to a WASP; we’re just about the last bastion of civility in America.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Levia-the-Dragon In reply to JamesE82 [2014-09-04 16:51:17 +0000 UTC]

Oh he's free to say whatever he likes... and I'm free to call him a douche because of it. You see how that two-way street works? Indeed, if he ever says something that crosses a certain line, the people are free to take him to court over slander charges, because that's the thing about freedom of speech, it's not freedom from the consequences of it. If you say something significantly offensive, damaging to a person's reputation or provably wrong then you can and should be held accountable for it. Like we teach our children, actions have consequences.

I'll also say that how many listeners he has is frankly irrelevant, people can be wrong en masse all the time, a popularity contest is not the same thing as a rightness one. If it were, then we'd only ever get competent world leaders. And when I say that, you immediately think of Obama, when I'm thinking of Bush jr, so both of us could be right or wrong there, and we'd both have a lot of people that agree with us. Furthermore, if someone's popularity allows them to say stupid things, knowing they'll be insulated from backlash or even legitimate criticism by their legion of fawning toadies, that's not really a good thing, that's the kind of environment that births rampant egomaniacs.

I don't care what someone is wearing, there is still a line you shouldn't cross, that's just being a civil and decent human being. Now where that line is placed is a matter for some level of debate, but saying that there isn't genuine sexual harassment out there is a bit naïve, and the fact there is this backlash certainly implies that the men in question have not in fact been dealt with in the proper manner for some time.

As to your closing statement... I genuinely don't know whether you're saying that with some level of self-aware/self-deprecating irony or not... and that scares me a little.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JamesE82 In reply to Levia-the-Dragon [2014-09-04 17:16:43 +0000 UTC]

I brought Rush’s popularity up to illustrate that he is in a rare position of power that allows him to be honest and not bite his nails over offending people he doesn’t care about, and who will hate him no matter what he does or doesn‘t do.

Should I make this joke? Sh-Should I? I don’t know, people who already think I’m a sexist Nazi and want me off the air might be mad at me! Better be safe and not say what I want; I won’t make any friends doing that, but at least people who are calling me names won’t call me even more names for a little while!

Backlash? No, these are busy-bodies making noise in front of cameras owned by people who agree with their ideas, safe in the knowledge that if anyone disagrees with them, they can point and scream, “he’s promoting rape-culture!” until dissenting voices are silenced. Backlash is, say, regular American citizens patrolling the border to stop violent criminals from entering their nation, and physically stopping busloads of literally diseased (yes, literally) foreign children from being dumped into their neighborhoods. I’m not changing the subject, just illustrating that a few pretty little crybabies complaining about men looking at their boobies when they show them off is different than a real movement formed to stop something that’s actually important.

There is not an epidemic of ghetto gang rape or Islamic forced virginity checks at these places; what usually goes on is, women like to show off, and men appreciate them for doing so. Once the women are hounded, made to feel uncomfortable by unreasonable actions, or actually touched, then there is a problem that needs to be dealt with. This particular group seems to be protesting things that are already against convention rules, or even the law itself when it comes to upskirting or physical contact, so this seems like the hysterical, shrieking branch of feminism doing what it always does: seeing people having a good time, feeling left out, and screaming until people with actual power put a stop to it.

Last time we talked you admitted you liked seeing people fired for saying things you don’t agree with, and now you apparently think people can get sued for being against certain groups? You’re not the only one scared at the moment, and if you think that white, Anglo-Saxon Protestants are not statistically very chivalrous when compared to some other groups, then I am also baffled.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Levia-the-Dragon In reply to JamesE82 [2014-09-04 22:47:54 +0000 UTC]

It might help people not to hate him if he didn't keep saying stuff like that. And I honestly don't think such a position of power is healthy for a person, yes you can't worry about what everyone thinks of you since there's always going to be someone out there that doesn't like you, but if a substantial number of people dislike you, that would seem to be an indication that it's time for some self-reflection. I don't think the world is a brighter, more interesting, intelligent or exiting place for him having made that joke, it didn't contribute anything to our culture or understanding of the way the world works, it's just the same cheap humour at someone's expense that has existed for decades. There comes a point where you have to balance doing what you want to do with not being an asshole, and if what you want to do is ignore any sense of restraint and just constantly be an asshole to some people, I don't think you're worth defending.

I also don't agree with silencing dissent, no matter where it comes from, I wouldn't call his comments to be contributing to "rape culture" but I would consider them to be legitimising objectification of women since he does have that position of cultural power and influence, and when he uses that to make people think it's okay to act like a complete sleazy tool, then that at the very least isn't making anything better.

Now... with regards to a busload of diseased children, I'm going to need a little more context, because I can understand not wanting to have a medical emergency on your hands if those infections get around, but if those children are collectively that sick that someone thought grouping them together and bringing them to America would help because there just isn't any way of treating them wherever they came from, then maybe that is a situation in need of a little humanitarian support rather than just dumping them back on the other side of the border to die. As to criminals, well yes, you do need to monitor your own borders, but if you're saying that people just coming over the border automatically become criminals without having any other sort of crimes on their records, well that makes me cock an eyebrow as international law does make allowances for people fleeing danger, treating them as refugees, and from what I understand of the situation over in Mexico, it's not unreasonable that at least some people crossing over the border could legitimately fear for their life, I also question whether this is something civilians should be doing.

I think you'll find that if they're talking about things happening at a con that are against con rules or indeed the law, then they're doing so because con security is inadequate and they are trying to raise awareness that more needs to be done to combat unwanted physical contact or the like, thing is, it doesn't matter what rules you have if you don't have the resources allocated to enforce them, and I haven't heard any input from convention organisers as to what level of security or supervision they actually do provide.

I admitted that someone who made a sustained series of incredibly offensive comments on twitter when it was not necessary deserved to be fired, I don't "like" that any of that happened, ideally that person would have simply ranted about how the INDIVIDUAL that assaulted them was unpleasant and left the matter of race out of it, as his language contained extremely archaic hatred that seemed to be directed at all black people because of the actions of this one woman that happened to be black. And I'd be very interested to see the study that statistically proves your theory of WASP types being the most civil.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JamesE82 In reply to Match25 [2014-09-04 15:19:27 +0000 UTC]

You got that right, buster!

I knew you’d like this one.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JamesE82 In reply to Paudraic [2014-09-04 15:18:04 +0000 UTC]

Or listen to the Kid’s Bop version of “Born this Way,” which actually exists; we play the music video ads for the CD in our children’s department at work.

Mommy, what’s a twans-secks-yoo-ow?

I find it amusing that the Crimson Conservative treats children no differently than adults, but yeah, the less she’s around the real young ones, the better.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JamesE82 In reply to moxiee [2014-09-04 15:13:34 +0000 UTC]

I seem to remember reading that it ends the last day of Summer, but remembered this more clearly: “Hyper Con 2014 starts June 21'st (first day of summer) and ends August 31.” (From your Angel Falls journal about it.) In other words, my supersoldier has more time to break out the beanbag-loaded shotguns, eh?

You know I like your needling; any mention of “COlga” still makes Connie’s skin crawl, though.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

moxiee In reply to JamesE82 [2014-09-05 04:18:07 +0000 UTC]

The term "COlga" needs to be used in universe.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JamesE82 In reply to Knight3000 [2014-09-04 15:07:46 +0000 UTC]

Almost sad how easily manipulated Connie can be when her ego is ruling her brain.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Knight3000 In reply to JamesE82 [2014-09-04 16:50:58 +0000 UTC]

RC seems to know how to do that

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JamesE82 In reply to Toni123456 [2014-09-04 15:06:54 +0000 UTC]

I wouldn’t mind seeing that, either. Would you rather it be a competition or a serious fight?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1