HOME | DD

Published: 2010-07-23 03:26:01 +0000 UTC; Views: 3268; Favourites: 151; Downloads: 30
Redirect to original
Description
You wanna be straight?You wanna draw band slash?
You wanna be gay?
You wanna be Muslim?
You wanna listen to metal?
You wanna fuck your sister?
You wanna be a vegetarian?
You wanna have a sex change?
You wanna get an abortion?
You wanna vote republican?
You wanna write Naruto porn?
You wanna read Twilight?
You wanna believe in God?
You wanna be liberal?
You wanna listen to rap?
You wanna smoke pot?
You wanna believe in Santa?
You wanna be a Scientologist?
You wanna watch porn?
You wanna marry your cousin?
You wanna get a nose job?
You wanna get your nipples pierced?
You wanna be fat?
You wanna wear tight pants?
You wanna drink alcohol?
You wanna have sex before marriage?
You wanna wait until marriage?
You wanna dye your hair funky colors?
You wanna watch cartoons?
You wanna be a nudist?
You wanna be antisocial?
You wanna write poetry?
GO FOR IT.
As long as you aren't hurting any person or animal, do whateverthefuck you want. And no one should be telling you not to, because it's none of their goddamn business.
Related content
Comments: 45
supermariojustin4 [2020-03-06 01:29:41 +0000 UTC]
Being a Scientologist is everyone's business! Scientology will ruin you if you give them the wrong look!
π: 0 β©: 0
DollaWolla [2017-11-06 03:17:29 +0000 UTC]
It's fine if it's not hurting people or property.
π: 0 β©: 0
Its-Asscake [2015-09-13 20:19:38 +0000 UTC]
Bandslashing is rude to sexuality's.
Incest isn't necessarily bad but if they have a child it's hurting the child gene wise.
π: 0 β©: 0
bIissey In reply to Dylan-the-dude [2016-06-24 21:18:36 +0000 UTC]
but how do u expect a kid to react to their mom is gonna die unless she gets an abortion ?? yes Β i would love a brother rather than my mother
π: 0 β©: 1
Dylan-the-dude In reply to bIissey [2016-06-25 21:38:35 +0000 UTC]
this is old. I have changed and I am prochoice. A lot can happen in three years.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
bIissey In reply to Dylan-the-dude [2016-06-25 21:40:02 +0000 UTC]
well, this is to the other pro lifers then.
π: 0 β©: 0
Nero--Angelo In reply to Dylan-the-dude [2014-02-08 10:14:10 +0000 UTC]
no one's forcing anyone to get abortions
that's why it's a choice
π: 0 β©: 0
ZebulonSmiley [2012-11-07 07:07:34 +0000 UTC]
I agree in this regard, but couldn't there be a little logic issues? I mean, fucking your sister might hurt her, right? Didn't seem like you specified if it was consensual or not. Also, I'd disagree that all these points could go without hurting someone. Lots of them would, like smoking pot.
I'm only wondering aloud as to what your logic is behind this. The skeletal idea is sound, but I think the points may be a little off.
π: 0 β©: 0
HeiMantaHei [2012-10-26 10:07:41 +0000 UTC]
That's how I think. It's okay unless it hurts somebody
π: 0 β©: 0
LittleLadyLaiho [2012-04-18 06:35:42 +0000 UTC]
I enjoy the bluntness. Because sometimes the only way to get a point across is to let'em have it!
π: 0 β©: 0
Bjarru [2012-01-27 09:03:55 +0000 UTC]
It's my credo O___O Really
My exact thoughts!
You're... a wizard O____O
π: 0 β©: 0
loqutor [2011-03-27 05:24:46 +0000 UTC]
Sex is nobody's business except the three people involved.
π: 0 β©: 0
sharprm [2010-10-06 04:22:47 +0000 UTC]
Can I steal someone's car? That's not hurting someone.
Can I invade people's privacy? That's not hurting someone.
Can I go drunk driving? As long as there isn't an accident, that's not hurting someone.
Can I burn someone's holy book? As long as you don't count feelings, that's not hurting someone.
Can I tell kids to drop out of school and do drugs? Since it's their choice, that's not hurting someone.
Can I euthanize the elderly and disabled? If the drug is painless, that's not hurting someone.
GO FOR IT?
π: 0 β©: 1
Kellatrix In reply to sharprm [2010-10-06 04:25:16 +0000 UTC]
I'd say that everything you just said is most definitely hurting someone, or opening a possibility for someone to get hurt.
π: 1 β©: 1
sharprm In reply to Kellatrix [2010-10-06 04:33:30 +0000 UTC]
Did you eat breakfast this morning?
- firstly cows are imprisoned and their milk is stolen (hurting something)
- then it is transported by truck (potentially people get run over hurting someone)
- then it is packaged (cutting down trees hurting something)
- the CO2 from that and the truck and electricity will affect the environment, years to come (hurting people)
- any plastic used comes from oil which people fight wars over (hurting people)
- sometimes there are manufacturing incidents like in China (hurting people)
- the money you spent could have gone to a charity that could have saved people from hunger (hurting someone)
- the rubbish may affect animals eg. plastic bag in turtle neck (hurting something)
Skip breakfast tomorrow huh?
π: 0 β©: 1
Kellatrix In reply to sharprm [2010-10-06 04:36:17 +0000 UTC]
With that mentality, we all may as well curl up into a ball until we die from starvation.
π: 1 β©: 1
sharprm In reply to Kellatrix [2010-10-06 04:38:45 +0000 UTC]
I know it's like "do no harm" is a stupid basis for morality, since whatever you do (or not do) you are harming people.
Maybe you should come up with a new reason why people should be allowed to be gay, fuck their cousin, smoke drugs etc.
π: 0 β©: 1
Kellatrix In reply to sharprm [2010-10-06 04:43:39 +0000 UTC]
I suppose it goes back to my own definition of 'harm'. I don't believe that killing animals for food is harmful; we're omnivores, we were designed to eat meat. So that argument, to me, is invalid.
I suppose what I meant really was, do whatever you want as long as you have no INTENT to harm others. Anyone can step outside and accidentally harm someone. It happens every day. If you're keeping to yourself and minding your own business, I see no harm in doing anything in that list.
π: 1 β©: 1
sharprm In reply to Kellatrix [2010-10-06 05:08:17 +0000 UTC]
I can get in a car drunk and not intent to harm people.
Should I do it?
π: 0 β©: 1
Kellatrix In reply to sharprm [2010-10-06 11:31:17 +0000 UTC]
You cannot get in a car drunk without the potential of harming people.
π: 0 β©: 1
sharprm In reply to Kellatrix [2010-10-06 23:18:52 +0000 UTC]
Here's one. It's from Apocalypse now but is based on a true story:
American soldiers went into a village and vaccinated all the children against deadly diseases. Even thought there was a small pain from the shot, the intent was to help them, not harm them.
When they came by the village later, they saw a big pile of children's arms. The villagers had thought the soldiers had tried to poison the children, so they cut off their arms to save them.
Both parties intended to save the children.
So in this case, were both the soldiers and the villagers "innocent" of intending to harm?
π: 0 β©: 1
sharprm In reply to Kellatrix [2010-10-07 02:23:49 +0000 UTC]
What about punishing criminals with jail sentences (many people get harmed in prison). Since the intent is to harm, should we get rid of jail sentences?
π: 0 β©: 1
Kellatrix In reply to sharprm [2010-10-07 02:26:15 +0000 UTC]
The intent is punishment for someone who DID intentionally cause harm, which is different than directly causing harm to the innocent.
π: 0 β©: 1
sharprm In reply to Kellatrix [2010-10-07 02:48:05 +0000 UTC]
What about if a man was running at you with a knife (you think trying to kill you), and you fatally shot him out of self defense?
π: 0 β©: 1
Kellatrix In reply to sharprm [2010-10-07 02:49:14 +0000 UTC]
He was trying to fucking kill me.
π: 0 β©: 1
sharprm In reply to Kellatrix [2010-10-07 02:54:11 +0000 UTC]
Last one: what about telling kids to drop out of school and use drugs (if the intent is to help them not become boring squares who kill the planet)?
π: 0 β©: 1
Kellatrix In reply to sharprm [2010-10-07 02:57:12 +0000 UTC]
If you want kids to use drugs, you sure as hell aren't helping them.
π: 0 β©: 2
Phoneix-Faerie In reply to Kellatrix [2011-05-26 22:58:51 +0000 UTC]
I know this discussion was a while ago, but you handled it really well.
π: 0 β©: 0
sharprm In reply to Kellatrix [2010-10-07 02:59:34 +0000 UTC]
But the (misguided) intent is to help them. So you're saying that we should judge people's actions by their intent relative to an societal view of what is acceptable?
π: 0 β©: 1
Tazerbrosinc In reply to sharprm [2014-02-02 21:38:43 +0000 UTC]
GOSH WHY THE HELL DID i READ THIS TO THE END NOW I'LL PROBABLY JUST MESS-EVERYTHING UP.Β
sharprm Β , the each have different views of whats harm and whats not, so I say.... GO FOR IT, if YOU BELIEVE it is not Β harming anyone else.
π: 0 β©: 0
SuffocatingRomano [2010-07-23 04:09:03 +0000 UTC]
THANK YOU.
You should add drawing shota and loli SINCE IT HURTS NO ONE, yet, people hate it.
π: 0 β©: 1
Myst1cMoonlight In reply to SuffocatingRomano [2021-03-26 22:18:41 +0000 UTC]
π: 0 β©: 0
Envy-Fangurrl [2010-07-23 03:31:47 +0000 UTC]
SAAAAANTAAAAAAAA.
I know him
TRUE THAT, HOMIE G-DAWG.
XDD;;;
π: 0 β©: 1
Kellatrix In reply to Envy-Fangurrl [2010-07-23 03:33:42 +0000 UTC]
All I can think of when I hear SANTA is Invader Zim.
SAHN-TAAAAAH?
π: 0 β©: 1