HOME | DD

Librarian-bot — Quark Trooper

Published: 2012-10-15 22:22:41 +0000 UTC; Views: 4023; Favourites: 62; Downloads: 52
Redirect to original
Description Quark + Trooper Armature

The most common combat unit employed by the Dominator battle fleet, this nimble armature is equipped with two powerful variable energy projectors, capable of everything from disabling enemy life forms to boring through solid rock. As with all Dominator technology when interfaced with a Quark AI unit, the armature can draw power directly from the local environment to recharge or affect nearby technology.

--

Yep, it's a Quark. I feel my gallery needs more variety, you see.

The BBC owns Doctor Who. Not entirely sure who owns the Quarks or the Dominators. This design is mine own.
Related content
Comments: 12

DANGERcomics [2013-11-09 15:04:08 +0000 UTC]

Cool redesign. I'd love to see these in the new series!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mambasnake [2012-12-29 19:24:23 +0000 UTC]

great improvement over the original tv story.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Librarian-bot In reply to mambasnake [2013-01-07 12:28:52 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mambasnake In reply to Librarian-bot [2013-01-08 11:39:27 +0000 UTC]

No problem.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Laharl234 [2012-10-15 23:13:23 +0000 UTC]

Colours on the tubes are better now.

Another thought; why do all Quarks have to be the box design or the sleeker designs? The Cybermen and Daleks ended up deviating on their designs for one reason or another between groups, don't see why Quarks would be any different. I dunno, I just really want to see those old designs Blenderized. You seem to change your mind on things lots, so no reason for me to give up hope yet.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Librarian-bot In reply to Laharl234 [2012-10-16 06:28:38 +0000 UTC]

Give up hope, at least of seeing my old biped design rebuilt in Blender. I'm going to redo the gunner Quark, but the old trooper is completely superseded by the above design.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Laharl234 In reply to Librarian-bot [2012-10-16 07:32:33 +0000 UTC]

Nah. I've seen you change your mind enough to not really put it past you to do it at least for historical purposes. You may not see that happening now, but who can predict which direction the creative mind will go?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Librarian-bot In reply to Laharl234 [2012-10-16 10:29:48 +0000 UTC]

Boy, are you going to be disappointed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Laharl234 In reply to Librarian-bot [2012-10-16 10:51:04 +0000 UTC]

Meh. Not like I depend on your designs.

Though I thought it was funny that, the Daleks deviate a little bit with the NDP from traditional designs and everyone (you included) freaks out. You radically alter the Quarks and people are mostly 'meh'.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Librarian-bot In reply to Laharl234 [2012-10-16 12:20:09 +0000 UTC]

What? You mean lots of people have things to say about an official design choice concerning one of the most well-known sci fi icons in modern television, broadcast two years ago on BBC 1 on a Saturday night with an audience of millions but no one has much to say about a fan redesign of a cheaply made robot from a dull story broadcast in 1968, posted on an art site so big that pretty much everything, good or bad, gets lost in the flood leaving everyone reliant on search functions?

WOW. What a shocking revelation. However shall I cope with this obvious slight against my precious work?

(That was sarcasm, by the way, in case that's not clear enough for you.)

Now, since I'm fed up of fending off your inane comments and you 'don't depend' on my redesigns, kindly take this as a hint and stop bugging me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Laharl234 In reply to Librarian-bot [2012-10-16 12:33:54 +0000 UTC]

However shall you cope with believing comments are 'obvious slights against your precious work'. It wasn't a slight in any way.

My point was that you seem to consider it a big deal to deviate minimally from the Dalek's design, but the Quarks you drastically redesign. I find that somewhat hypocritical. Which isn't really a bad thing because everyone's a hypocrit in some way. One could pull up my feelings on the Cybermen and compare it to this situation and point out I'm being just as much a hypocrit.

Hope that's a better description of the point I was attempting to make.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Laharl234 In reply to Librarian-bot [2012-10-16 12:27:37 +0000 UTC]

You take offense very easily.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0