HOME | DD

MetalShadowOverlord — BPLM Pro-Life Sign 9

Published: 2010-10-13 13:45:24 +0000 UTC; Views: 1611; Favourites: 15; Downloads: 10
Redirect to original
Description Pro-life sign at the Boston Massachusetts March For Life, and the last of the Boston Pro-Life 2010 March photos.
Related content
Comments: 26

DemonicFury5678 [2024-04-06 18:09:18 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Slimey-Slime [2016-05-03 00:24:12 +0000 UTC]

Even Jesus is getting headaches from pro-life people.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Jenny345 [2014-10-02 02:46:38 +0000 UTC]

I agree 100%.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MissouriFangirl7789 [2012-06-18 06:10:01 +0000 UTC]

this is so touching

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

thesuperqueer [2012-05-07 02:21:59 +0000 UTC]

Jesus never said anything about abortion, ever. Old pedonuts in humiliating hats did.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Slimey-Slime In reply to thesuperqueer [2016-05-08 03:37:25 +0000 UTC]

yes

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

schizophrenticpsycho [2012-05-01 22:22:36 +0000 UTC]

What if someone got pregnant after rape? What if she is just 13, still unable to speak after the event, terrified of sudden movements, loud noises, and shouting. What if she was your daughter? What happens when you hear her sobbing in her room each night because of what happened. When she's checked into the mental psychiatric ward for trying to kill herself your guts twist and a lump forms in your throat. You can't stand the pain in your daughters eyes. Then you find that the monster who beat your child black and blue has impregnated her. She is fearful, and is in no way ready for this.
Carrying the child might kill her.
Will you let her chose?

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Bawnyo In reply to schizophrenticpsycho [2015-10-01 20:10:40 +0000 UTC]

What? To kill her child?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lokitheinvinsable In reply to schizophrenticpsycho [2013-03-21 15:25:49 +0000 UTC]

if the child would defiantly kill her but she wanted to have the baby i'd let her make the choice,people may have the right to choose,but only if the choice isn't for selfish reason's such as getting in the way of school,or you don't want to have a child at the moment,if it's because you think the child will be an inconvenience then yes abortion is in my humble opinion worse than murder

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Slimey-Slime In reply to lokitheinvinsable [2016-05-08 03:37:51 +0000 UTC]

"getting in the way of school"

What the f-

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AnimeAngel0 [2011-09-18 21:29:07 +0000 UTC]

.............this is powerful..............thank you for sharing it......

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MetalShadowOverlord In reply to AnimeAngel0 [2011-09-18 21:32:17 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome. :3

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

wolfplanet102 [2011-03-06 17:33:26 +0000 UTC]

I agree it would be on the black market, but you do here stories like that, and they say it was the worst decision ever.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MetalShadowOverlord In reply to wolfplanet102 [2011-03-06 17:59:56 +0000 UTC]

Or back alley style, but there's gonna be back alley abortions no matter what people do.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

teribane [2011-02-05 04:06:09 +0000 UTC]

So, just randomly browsing Deviantart and I ended up finding this.
I'd say I'm Pro-Choice, probably, but not because I specifically approve of abortion or anything. I'd just say that abortion being legal would probably be better, because even if it was outlawed people would be trying to do it, but then it'd be "black market" and probably not well regulated. Not only unborn would die, but many of the ones who are pregnant too.
And even assuming somehow this black market can be stopped. If a person can't support a baby, then what? It starves? Maybe if it's lucky to an orphanage?
And what if someone is, say, raped, and it's not their fault?

On the other hand, if you can support a baby easily, and it's your fault you're pregnant because you weren't careful - then too bad. Your fault, you shouldn't kill someone just because you're lazy. Probably even if you were raped - which is obviously not a good thing, but if you can support the baby then maybe you should keep it.
Problem is doctors can't exactly screen everyone easily to check if they can support it or not. Even if they could, and somehow eliminate people who will try to "cheat," same black market problem. In fact it's the people who can support a baby who'll probably have more money for such a thing.

So... that's my opinion.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Eumeia In reply to teribane [2012-03-11 02:49:07 +0000 UTC]

I think in your position you're not looking at the core of the issue: It is wrong to kill an innocent human person.

It really doesn't make sense to say no to outlawing murder just because some people will get around the law and do it anyway. It's the government's obligation to protect all human life.

If someone can't support a baby, then adoption is an accessible option. There are huge numbers of couples on waiting lists hoping to adopt babies. No baby would ever starve. If the baby was not adopted right away, then it would go into foster care or a foster home.

With rape, adoption is the way to go if the mother does not feel she can keep the baby. You should see some of the many testimonies of people who were the product of rape - they all say that they are glad their mothers let them live. Surely the baby doesn't deserve to die for its father's crime?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

teribane In reply to Eumeia [2012-03-11 03:44:14 +0000 UTC]

With murder, the majority of people know it's wrong. Abortion is a rather more iffy subject and many more people will try to get around it.

Adoption is nice, but the problem is it's going to end up with many more kids than will ever be adopted. As far as I'm aware this is already the case. And while there are those that get happy endings, there's just as many that get horrible lives because they were sent to an adoption center - and not just because they don't have "real parents", but for many other reasons too. Adoption is a good thing but not the be-all end-all solution.

Of course they say that they're glad to be alive! Most people are, the ones that don't usually end up trying to suicide. But I'm relatively certain babies don't think of such subjects, not when they're not even born. As far as I know all abortions happen before there's even coherent thought. It'd be much worse if that wasn't the case. I think the difference between Pro-Life and Pro-Choice is when they consider the baby alive.

Best solution would be abstinence. Sadly most people won't even pay attention to that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Eumeia In reply to teribane [2012-03-12 13:48:33 +0000 UTC]

I don't mean at all to carry this into a debate, but I felt I needed to point out - ALL scientists agree that human life begins at conception. After meeting of sperm and egg, you have an entirely new, unique, separate living organism from the mother.

The only debate comes from people who argue that the pregnancy doesn't really begin until implantation into the uterus. Which doesn't make a lot of sense because WHERE the embryo is doesn't change WHAT it is.


I agree with you on abstinence, though. I've seen a hilarious T-shirt that says, "Abstinence: 99.99% effective" showing the Virgin Mary. XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

teribane In reply to Eumeia [2012-03-13 05:49:43 +0000 UTC]

Meh. I think I was trying to say sentient life? Sentient enough to actually care whether they live or die?

Doesn't matter. I don't really feel like a debate right now either. I doubt we'd be able to convince the other to switch sides in either case, so there's not really all that much point.

...that is an amazing t-shirt. 8D

Apparently sex feels really nice though so people can't even bother to try and restrain themselves sometimes. *sigh* And, well, I can understand why some people don't like contraceptives, I guess, even if I don't necessarily agree with that either - but if you're going to go around having sex for fun, do you honestly want the choice between abortion, giving away for adoption, or keeping a baby you're not ready for? *facepalm*
...all of my frustration on this subject.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

little-rita [2010-10-15 20:54:00 +0000 UTC]

I love the image on the board... the image itself is poigniant for those who have suffered miscarriages and stillbirths too...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MetalShadowOverlord In reply to little-rita [2010-10-15 21:52:31 +0000 UTC]

Ah! I totally didn't think of that!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

GrayJaeger [2010-10-13 14:54:25 +0000 UTC]

More like "The Agony of Pro-Life Deviation Floods"

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MetalShadowOverlord In reply to GrayJaeger [2010-10-13 15:31:51 +0000 UTC]

That's why they're put into groups with an X at the top: you can delete it all in bulk without having to burn your precious eyes. :3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

GrayJaeger In reply to MetalShadowOverlord [2010-10-13 23:58:21 +0000 UTC]

I was hoping there was something good in your deviation flood!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MetalShadowOverlord In reply to GrayJaeger [2010-10-14 20:59:17 +0000 UTC]

Well, I'm done with the pro-life stuff, so your eyes won't burn anymore.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

GrayJaeger In reply to MetalShadowOverlord [2010-10-15 00:24:51 +0000 UTC]

YAY!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0