HOME | DD

method2madness — Cherry Inclusion

Published: 2010-05-28 03:24:07 +0000 UTC; Views: 174; Favourites: 2; Downloads: 22
Redirect to original
Description An early piece that I decided to finish. The grain and the inclusion are kinda nice but there are some deep gouges that I could not sand out. I didn't really know what I was doing yet when I turned this one.
Related content
Comments: 16

welshmike [2010-05-29 02:43:10 +0000 UTC]

That must have been really difficult to turn with the inclusion!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

method2madness In reply to welshmike [2010-05-29 02:54:26 +0000 UTC]

Sadly it was an has the tool marks to show This was one of the very first things I turned though. I could do much better now!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Dryad-8 [2010-05-28 22:33:37 +0000 UTC]

That inclusion and the shape make it such a special piece. Have you thought of defining a band to include the toolmarks and then texturing to hide them.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

method2madness In reply to Dryad-8 [2010-05-29 01:52:21 +0000 UTC]

No I have not but that sounds like a freekin' awesome idea! It might be a bit of work since I already sanded off the tenon. But it could take it from a beginner's "ho-hum" piece to something quite nice!

That type of advice is why I love this site so much!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dryad-8 In reply to method2madness [2010-05-29 05:04:29 +0000 UTC]

Idea 1 Sand base flat, glue on a block and turn a new tenon. Then you can work on the lathe again.

Idea 2 Mark out a deliberately wavy band and texture freehand. I did that on a little box that had some scattered defects that wouldn't fit in a straight band.

I always turn a shallow undercut recess into my bases so if I need to go back and play later I can expansion chuck into the recess to hold the work.

The amount of inspiration and help I've found on DA is just AWESOME.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

method2madness In reply to Dryad-8 [2010-05-31 04:51:34 +0000 UTC]

How do you feel about using a woodburning pen to decorate the blemishes with a stipple technique?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dryad-8 In reply to method2madness [2010-05-31 07:40:02 +0000 UTC]

Don't see why it wouldnt work, and the options are endless. Stipple, crosshatch, waves, dragon scales, Inuit designs, whatever. The only problem I could see was if the finish on the bowl affected the woodburning. My experience is limited to bare wood

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

method2madness In reply to Dryad-8 [2010-06-01 05:13:16 +0000 UTC]

I usually burn my logo and wood type on the bottom after I finish it and haven't noticed any odd effects. I'm just using bee's wax and mineral oil though. Other finishes might not respond kindly to being burnt

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

method2madness In reply to Dryad-8 [2010-05-29 07:09:06 +0000 UTC]

Idea 1 would work but the piece is out of wack around the inclusion.

Idea 2 is the way to go for this piece.

Undercutting is a new idea to me but makes a lot of sense. I will keep that in mind on future pieces.

I'm surprised that you find anything useful on this site considering your skill!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dryad-8 In reply to method2madness [2010-05-29 09:20:24 +0000 UTC]

God, I still have so much to learn, but thank you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

method2madness In reply to Dryad-8 [2010-05-29 22:07:59 +0000 UTC]

You're very welcome!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

tablelander [2010-05-28 08:14:45 +0000 UTC]

That has a TON of character!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

method2madness In reply to tablelander [2010-05-29 01:54:07 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, I appreciate it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bear48 [2010-05-28 05:23:16 +0000 UTC]

Nice place to start but you are right about the tool marks

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

method2madness In reply to bear48 [2010-05-28 05:24:40 +0000 UTC]

Yeah but I've learned since then

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bear48 In reply to method2madness [2010-05-28 05:30:21 +0000 UTC]

cool

👍: 0 ⏩: 0