HOME | DD

Published: 2011-05-16 14:24:04 +0000 UTC; Views: 3543; Favourites: 17; Downloads: 435
Redirect to original
Description
Say "Fuck You!" with a smile on your face and love in your heart. Respect the paths of others and that their path may not be yours. Be honest with yourself about what does and does not resonate and know that when someone else is learning the hard way, that its okay to acknowledge that it sucks to be them and you're thankful that its not you going through it all.What you think about and thank about, you bring about!
So as long as you are respecting your own free will and respecting the free will of others, then to say "wow, that guy is such a dickface!" is merely expressing your observation that you and the other person do not resonate. You're fire and water, but -- THATS OKAY!!
Some folks think I am a very nice, very kind, very wise and very intelligent human being. Others think I am an insufferably annoying mother fucker who should keep his strong opinions to himself. I respect both opinions
Related content
Comments: 89
Archangel-Zer0 [2011-05-16 19:10:22 +0000 UTC]
No offense, but I don't have to respect everyone. I don't need to respect rapists. Or child molesters. Or racists, etc...
But hey, I like where you're coming from on this one!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paradigm-shifting In reply to Archangel-Zer0 [2011-05-16 20:18:20 +0000 UTC]
Well you can respect their right to learn the hard way. Someone wants to rape and molest? Well, they can get raped and molested by their new cell mate bubba who is gonna be making them pick up the soap Theres no hate in my statement there.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Archangel-Zer0 In reply to paradigm-shifting [2011-05-16 20:20:44 +0000 UTC]
That's true.... also their right to be beaten with heavy mining equipment by people who have a right to be filled with rage at their actions lol
A good post over all!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paradigm-shifting In reply to Archangel-Zer0 [2011-05-17 00:30:36 +0000 UTC]
No, thats mining equipment abuse and you might get sued by the union. Do you have any idea how hard it is to fucking get all that blood out from all those moving parts?
Thanks
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Archangel-Zer0 In reply to paradigm-shifting [2011-05-17 08:43:49 +0000 UTC]
Sadly enough, I do know how hard it is to remove blood from mining equipment. Praise the Lord for the invention of Power-Washers lol
I enjoy fictional violence!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paradigm-shifting In reply to Archangel-Zer0 [2011-05-17 14:44:14 +0000 UTC]
You might also enjoy my "WTF?!" folder then: [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
daPhyre In reply to ??? [2011-05-16 17:32:06 +0000 UTC]
This reflexion is so filled with true o.o... You must love it!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ImagesByAndrew In reply to ??? [2011-05-16 16:51:59 +0000 UTC]
Strong opinions have their place. So do clowning asses. I respect that you think what you do and I'm totally going to show everyone I can this image, too.
Great piece!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
doctormo In reply to ??? [2011-05-16 15:33:28 +0000 UTC]
When you like someone, you appreciate them because of what they are.
When you love someone, you love them despite what they are.
I don't like this work (I think it's naive) but I do like you Twarrior. I think well of most of your work too. But that's the hitch isn't it, if I didn't love you as a human I wouldn't bother to explain my criticism. I'd continue on my life without saying anything.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paradigm-shifting In reply to doctormo [2011-05-16 15:41:37 +0000 UTC]
Well thank you
It is obvious to me that we are both making two unique creative expressions of the exact same point. So is either of our points really naive? Or are they merely two equally valid modes of expression?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
doctormo In reply to paradigm-shifting [2011-05-16 17:17:51 +0000 UTC]
expression isn't worth much if it's not understood.
- Shouting into the wind
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paradigm-shifting In reply to doctormo [2011-05-17 00:28:43 +0000 UTC]
Context is subjective, truth is colored by perspective. Understanding requires a willingness to explore new perspectives otherwise there is no understanding. Thats why science, religion, etc is always fighting with each other
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
doctormo In reply to paradigm-shifting [2011-05-17 01:34:50 +0000 UTC]
Contexts need to be different in that case, not either illogical or superseded by any other context.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
paradigm-shifting In reply to doctormo [2011-05-17 02:03:25 +0000 UTC]
Silly dA lol ... as I was saying:
The open mind is open to the COMPLETELY NEW where as the bottlenecked mind absolutely, positively MUST have anything new "somehow magically" link back to an existing context in the brain.
Now no offence but to me, the bottlenecked viewpoint is whats nonsense. You may as well be expecting a whale to grow legs and walk on the land in order to be able to make a claim that it is a whale and not a dolphin. lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
doctormo In reply to paradigm-shifting [2011-05-17 13:56:39 +0000 UTC]
Tell that to the Ambulocetus
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paradigm-shifting In reply to doctormo [2011-05-17 14:39:00 +0000 UTC]
Well I agree there. A closed mind and something thats been DEAD for a small eternity has MUCH in common!
Theres little difference between "perceptively asleep" and "dead" beyond that of one is already worm food and the other will be in the future
The dinosaurs prove that this world is about survival of the most ADAPTABLE and NOT of the "fittest". The dinosaurs were extremely fit but most of them are dead (I say most because there are a SELECT FEW which remain, such as the crocodile and alligator, for example. Science has classified them as one of the remaining few of the dinosaurs and they haven't changed much since back in those days).
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
doctormo In reply to paradigm-shifting [2011-05-17 15:04:25 +0000 UTC]
Birds are considered to be the direct dinosaurs, where as crocs are ancient lizards but I don't believe they were ever in the dinosaur family.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paradigm-shifting In reply to doctormo [2011-05-17 16:16:19 +0000 UTC]
Birds evolved from them. Where as crocks have not changed much (if at all) since back in those days
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
doctormo In reply to paradigm-shifting [2011-05-17 19:09:57 +0000 UTC]
But crocs back in those days or these days aren't dinosaurs.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
paradigm-shifting In reply to doctormo [2011-05-17 02:01:35 +0000 UTC]
Exactly my point A limiting factor or bottlenecking of information and knew knowledge is when someone says "my context is right, any other is nonsense -- in order for it to make sense, it needs to be this and can not be that".
The open mind states "I don't understand your context, but I am willing to. Can you explain it please?" and does so without requiring that a brand spanking new context somehow absolutely NEEDS to be linked to an existing frame of reference within the mind. The open mind is open to the
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Stormythepsycho In reply to ??? [2011-05-16 14:25:41 +0000 UTC]
I think I love you {{as a friend}}
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paradigm-shifting In reply to Stormythepsycho [2011-05-16 14:30:08 +0000 UTC]
Well even if you were female, you'd still be jailbait. So I am thankful that your love remains within the realm of friendship!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paradigm-shifting In reply to Stormythepsycho [2011-05-16 14:35:26 +0000 UTC]
Love thy Pedobears and know that tossing their asses in jail is merely a respect for their right to go fuck themselves
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Stormythepsycho In reply to paradigm-shifting [2011-05-16 14:37:09 +0000 UTC]
and be fucked by gay inmates >xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paradigm-shifting In reply to Stormythepsycho [2011-05-16 15:47:42 +0000 UTC]
With 10 inch wanks ... erhmm ... I mean SHANKS!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
<= Prev |