HOME | DD

Published: 2012-05-22 22:32:15 +0000 UTC; Views: 897; Favourites: 11; Downloads: 18
Redirect to original
Description
Here is a WIP of a map for my alien planet which was originally created byThe "nice" numbers come from a "nice" axial tilt of 30 degrees, so the Tropics are 30° from the equator, and polar circles 60° from the equator. What is interesting, though, that the icecaps (80° from the equator) do not fill the entire polar regions. The icecaps are only seasonal on top of that, which means that the "bright" pole is always without the icecap, which only forms on the "dark" pole.
What's puzzling now is that there is no land reaching into the icecap regions. I'm wondering if I should leave it at that or if I should ask James to change the map. Another thing that's bugging me is that the icecaps wouldn't be the only white areas when the planet would be seen from space. But how far from the poles would the snow be in winter? (notice that the other hemisphere would be so warm it wouldn't even have an icecap! Even though the icecaps are small, their melting would cause great floods. That means thatboth hemispheres (northern/southern) would have different coastlines in summer and winter, which makes my head burn. How much of a difference would there be? It would depend on the steepness on the coast, there are so many variables! D=
Well, at this point, ANY advice or thought is more than welcome!
Related content
Comments: 40
NocturnalSea [2012-05-24 06:02:05 +0000 UTC]
Well, this is shaping up to be quite a detailed world. Once you've got a fair number of creatures and terrains developed, you should totally consider writing little short stories set on you planet. Perhaps something in a documentary style.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PeteriDish In reply to NocturnalSea [2012-05-24 06:59:04 +0000 UTC]
I'll try! Thank you! I was thinking about something similar - writing about the environment through the eyes of local animals
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
KingsOfEvilArt In reply to PeteriDish [2012-05-23 08:24:31 +0000 UTC]
btw it's a really cool idea with the ice caps. It's such a cool new habitat so different from what we have on earth. I imagine there could be whole group of "migrating scavengers" analogue to great herds of Africa, as certainly there would be much left dead/trapped after the floods are over. And as they are so regular I bet there would be any bigger plants there... which gives us desert. Desert filled with dead things of all sort. Now that's so creepy
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PeteriDish In reply to KingsOfEvilArt [2012-05-23 08:50:56 +0000 UTC]
Well, according to James - (he has the point here and I totally missed that whed writing the description) - even though icecaps partially melt on earth too, it doesn't affect the coasts at all, and I also forgot that at the time when one of the icecaps melts and shrinks, the other one freezes and grows, which would further decrease that effect. HOWEVER we can periodically flood things by having a relatively big moon(s) relatively closer than what's true for earth
and/or by having more intensive rainy seasons
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KingsOfEvilArt In reply to PeteriDish [2012-05-23 08:53:15 +0000 UTC]
Well I hope the planet has really big moons then
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PeteriDish In reply to KingsOfEvilArt [2012-05-23 09:12:04 +0000 UTC]
I will make sure to make things interesting
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
tskorigami [2012-05-23 02:21:00 +0000 UTC]
i've understood half of what you said, i did't get the land reaching icecap part :-/ and the coast
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PeteriDish In reply to tskorigami [2012-05-23 06:09:14 +0000 UTC]
Well, there is no land within the icecap regions, right? And if an icecap melts, there's a lot of extra water, right? So it's gonna go somewhere, right? Like the coastal regions.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
tskorigami In reply to PeteriDish [2012-05-23 06:28:10 +0000 UTC]
Ooh, I get it.
In short, absence of the antarcticas xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PeteriDish In reply to tskorigami [2012-05-23 07:18:42 +0000 UTC]
Kinda. There simply wouldn't be no icecaps which would stay in place throughout the entire year - you see, when one of the icecaps would grow, the other icecap would melt to such a degree where it would dissappear, (summer) the dissappeared icecap would start to form and grow to its full extent (winter) and the other icecap would melt at the same time until it dissapeears. you see, there would always be an icecap (there would be two icecaps during spring and autumn - those would be both very small) but either icecap would melt completely during summer season on that hemisphere
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
tskorigami In reply to PeteriDish [2012-05-23 07:58:28 +0000 UTC]
well, that is quite a weather cycle. how long would a year be in earthen units?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PeteriDish In reply to tskorigami [2012-05-23 08:01:20 +0000 UTC]
All you need to know is here: [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
tskorigami In reply to PeteriDish [2012-05-23 08:05:34 +0000 UTC]
such a short year and such a complicated weather system?
you sure this would work?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PeteriDish In reply to tskorigami [2012-05-23 08:19:23 +0000 UTC]
why not I don't think a "living" planet would have to be exactly like earth, and even here are organisms cappable of coping with extreme conditions, and remember that such environment would be natural for the local organisms, in the same way how earthly environment is natural for earthly organisms. Most earthly organisms would have a hard time there, but I don't think that's a bad thing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
tskorigami In reply to PeteriDish [2012-05-23 08:21:24 +0000 UTC]
or that's 'normal' for them?
but still, it is a very extreme system
seriously, a melting and freezing icecap in 278 days? that's crazy!
wild imagination, i guess
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PeteriDish In reply to tskorigami [2012-05-23 08:44:07 +0000 UTC]
Well it's not crazy. the planet is closer to the star, but the star is not as bright/hot as sun which allows liquid water in a roughly Venus' distance from the star. that's why it has shorter year. it sounds crazy from our point of view, but a hot star could have life on one moon of a distant ice giant in contrast, and for the gas giant it could take centuries to finish one orbit! If the moon had liquid water on the surface, it would have decades of summer and decades of winter (while being periodically "blacked out" from the starlight by its parent planet), seasons would take extremely long periods of time to change, and they would last extremely long. You see, there is no "too fast" or "too slow" mark for water freezing or ice melting, because it all depends on the local circumcistances. the seasons would be shorter and change faster on a planet with shorter year than that of earth, and the opposite for a planet with longer year. You see, you may think that it's "impossible" that ice could freeze or melt that fast, but you have to remember that the pace at which our seasons change is directly dependent on the length of our year, so quicker change in shorter seasons (in comparison with earth) is only consequential if you have a shorter year. Some of the "extremeness" comes from the greater axial tilt - greater axial tilt implies more extreme seasonal changes, but the planet's over all temperature, which is slightly higher than that of earth, would take down from "too cold" winters in a lot of areas, but drought seasons would be drier and rain seasons would be rainier than on earth.
There is nothing strange about it in fact, it's all only a consequence of the basic properties of the planet and its distance from the star.
And besides, where would be the "fun" of making an "alien" planet if it was a "twin" of earth? Not that it would be impossible for an "earth's twin" to exist, it's just way less fun to pick such a planet for a xenobiology project.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
tskorigami In reply to PeteriDish [2012-05-23 08:54:57 +0000 UTC]
i didn't think of the 'external' factors xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PeteriDish In reply to tskorigami [2012-05-23 09:14:20 +0000 UTC]
it's fine, don't worry about it
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
JamesVF [2012-05-23 00:41:28 +0000 UTC]
Quite honestly, the notion that complex fauna could withstand such rigorous climate change every season seems slightly implausible, though not impossible. Also, if one side of the ocean is constantly frozen while the other side is nearly tropical, then the salinity of the ocean would fluctuate to the extent that all of your oceanic life would likely die. As for the polar regions, keep in mind that ocean water is quite adverse to freezing, while the ground can have perpetual permafrost rather easily. Most likely, the ice covered land would nearly encompass all the way up to the 45 degree mark, so having diverse climate is not a huge concern in that respect. Further, keep in mind that Terran polar caps melt every year as well, and yet the coastlines do not show any significant change from space. Also, keep in mind that position on the globe is not necessarily the climate of the region, especially if you have such steep fluctuations of the oceans temperatures.
Hope that helped...
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
PeteriDish In reply to JamesVF [2012-05-23 07:09:46 +0000 UTC]
Oh. Also keep in mind that at the time when one of the icecaps melts, the other one grows, so the "ice cover" remains roughly the same, but the distribution is different.
Would that still create salinity fluctuations? Either way, I think that local life would have ways how to cope with that, either by being very tolerant to changes or by migrating into places with suitable salinity. It's the same with birds. They either stay during the winter or follow the warmth to the south.
On another note, even though salty water is adverse to freezing, the icecaps on earth don't only cover dry land, but ocean too, right?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
PeteriDish In reply to JamesVF [2012-05-23 06:52:08 +0000 UTC]
No, not one side of the ocean, yous the little "strip" around the southern or northern pole
Just to avoid confusion, I know that the icecaps shrink in summer and grow in winter, and I didn't mean that the "bright" side would be all tropical and the "dark" side all antarctic, this is meant to be an over all slightly warmer planet than earth, which is why I am not sure how far would the snowy regions extend, but the "permanent ice cover" would be very small. That's why I have trouble imagining what would the winter look like...
At least the coasts can stay the same
About the life... Keeep in mind that there are "tolerant" organisms on earth too, which can withstand going from "extreme to extreme" changes in their habitat, desert animals have to cope with heat during the day and cold during the night, and some plants need to be burnt by fire in order to release seeds. And also remember that what you say would be true for most EARTHLY organisms - they would die there, because they are not adapted to such changes - but I can see no problem why that would prevent LOCAL complex life. Billions of years of natural selection in such environment would favor the hardiest of the hardiest, and those could diversificate.
And yeah, you've definitely helped! Thank you!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
OblivionJunkey94 [2012-05-22 23:22:28 +0000 UTC]
I think it looks good didnt you have a satilite looking image of this map some were as for the poles i dunno i gues the melting and refreezing could be benaficial to certain animals as the effect on the geography i dunno
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PeteriDish In reply to OblivionJunkey94 [2012-05-23 06:57:33 +0000 UTC]
Yes I have such an image: [link] but it was too obvious that it was just an editted earth's map, which is why James stepped in.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OblivionJunkey94 In reply to PeteriDish [2012-05-23 07:13:39 +0000 UTC]
Well maybe he can work his magic
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PeteriDish In reply to OblivionJunkey94 [2012-05-23 07:29:16 +0000 UTC]
I have no doubts about that
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
disrhythmic [2012-05-22 23:08:42 +0000 UTC]
It looks like a giant hummingbird chasing a stegosaurus. <3
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
KingsOfEvilArt In reply to disrhythmic [2012-05-23 05:02:35 +0000 UTC]
Hahahah Dude you made my day XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Cowburger13 In reply to disrhythmic [2012-05-22 23:30:31 +0000 UTC]
lol XD Your totally right!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
disrhythmic In reply to Cowburger13 [2012-05-22 23:44:27 +0000 UTC]
And the stegosaurus looks so happy about it ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1