HOME | DD

Shimmering-Sword β€” Battletech - Shadow Hawk

#acs #anthony #arm #auto #battle #battlemech #battletech #cannon #classic #concept #gun #hawk #illustration #laser #launcher #line #lineart #mech #mecha #mechwarrior #medium #missile #redesign #scroggins #shadow #shadowhawk #shimmering #sword #tech #trooper #unseen #warrior #autocannon #shimmeringsword #s #c #art #newseen
Published: 2017-11-30 17:03:43 +0000 UTC; Views: 24272; Favourites: 482; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Just a few more to go in the lineart dump.
This "classic" (or "newseen" as the fans call it) set of mechs is intended to refresh the art for some early era mechs.
My goal was to be as faithful as possible to the originals to deliver something recognizable and iconic, yet still come up with something original.

The shadow hawk was fairly straight forward in the redesign process, though we did go through a lot of iteration and ideas over the cockpit.
I wanted a more box face style, similar to what you see in MWO and some of the original battletech lineart (not dougram art), but we finalized on something more angular.
Related content
Comments: 59

BaresarkArfwisg [2019-02-21 14:37:18 +0000 UTC]

Better than the Phoenix Hawk lol

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

BishopSteiner [2017-12-12 15:13:41 +0000 UTC]

Yeah still waiting to get the mini of this guy.... but I notice a certain gap in these NuSeen... no Quads?

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

Shimmering-Sword In reply to BishopSteiner [2017-12-12 16:19:35 +0000 UTC]

Wants gave way to needs, we definitely talked about getting the Goliath done.

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

Deviator101 [2017-12-03 23:22:04 +0000 UTC]

This guys miniture is already out I noticed.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Shimmering-Sword In reply to Deviator101 [2017-12-04 19:19:32 +0000 UTC]

Yep, one of several CGL approved IWM to produce. Though, an improved version will be in the box set.

πŸ‘: 2 ⏩: 1

Deviator101 In reply to Shimmering-Sword [2017-12-04 22:07:26 +0000 UTC]

Same pose I hope. I've also seen a painted Battlemaster and Thunderbolt.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Viereth [2017-12-03 02:58:16 +0000 UTC]

I've got five of these in miniature form in various stages of getting painted.Β  One of my new favorites.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Shimmering-Sword In reply to Viereth [2017-12-07 19:44:36 +0000 UTC]

You're probably going to find yourself with a 6th or more when the new box set hits

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

Viereth In reply to Shimmering-Sword [2017-12-14 04:55:01 +0000 UTC]

At a bare minimum

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Darkton93 [2017-12-02 07:21:15 +0000 UTC]

Nice take on the Dougram!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Deviator101 [2017-12-01 15:21:35 +0000 UTC]

Is that an LRM 5 in its shoulder?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Deviator101 [2017-12-01 15:20:14 +0000 UTC]

CONGRATS! This pic is on SARNA.NET!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Deviator101 [2017-12-01 15:04:13 +0000 UTC]

Hmm interesting. I'm kinda torn here as the shoulder mounted AC in MWO looks more plausible but your redesign also has marit.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Shimmering-Sword In reply to Deviator101 [2017-12-01 20:55:49 +0000 UTC]

On mine it more or less aims to match the old Dougram design as requested by my art director. I'd have preferred an MWO style mount too.

πŸ‘: 2 ⏩: 0

erdervv In reply to Deviator101 [2017-12-01 18:10:35 +0000 UTC]

I'm sure that in the first grey death legion book Grayson Carlyle uses his left hand to grab the AC5 barrel and direct the fire at some point, i think it was when he fought the crusader, you can't do something like that with the MWO design, or any time of AA work, this mount looks a bit more fragile but better suited for attacking fast moving targets.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Deviator101 In reply to erdervv [2017-12-01 19:17:41 +0000 UTC]

And it can change angle, makes sense. I just hope the new model mounts the AC better than on the first one.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Stargazzer811 [2017-12-01 07:25:19 +0000 UTC]

Best Shadow Hawk I've seen. And no seriously, I'm not kissing ass, it truly IS the best Shadow Hawk I've ever seen.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Shimmering-Sword In reply to Stargazzer811 [2017-12-07 19:40:37 +0000 UTC]

The things one can say without nostalgia gogglesΒ 

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

Stargazzer811 In reply to Shimmering-Sword [2017-12-07 21:12:45 +0000 UTC]

Indeed

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

EVAUnit4A [2017-11-30 22:30:03 +0000 UTC]

The problem with this guy is he's clearly built primarily for melee, but all video games (not just MWO) have shunned that aside because game engines and physics and technical bullshittery that they really should have looked into BEFORE commiting to having it in their title and so it becomes fairly underwhelming for its meager ranged arrangements.

ARRANGEMENTS (#CannotUnsee )

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Zax19taken In reply to EVAUnit4A [2017-12-01 16:37:51 +0000 UTC]

Yep, I like the melee side and it's never really relevant in PC games x)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

EVAUnit4A In reply to Zax19taken [2017-12-01 19:27:46 +0000 UTC]

They tried to do collisions and knock-down in MWO, but the physics were sooo sensitive that even scratching paint caused allied mechs to both fall over instantly (many players say that could have been avoided by using a different game engine!), and the vocal minority snowflake OP-must-nerf-Lights players complained really loudly that getting knocked over by something like the kinetic impact of a quarter-ton solid steel sphere moving at almost the speed of light from a Gauss Rifle was "unreasonable".

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Shimmering-Sword In reply to EVAUnit4A [2017-12-01 00:39:49 +0000 UTC]

But this is battletech, no one punches, only kicks

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

WILDMUSTANGX [2017-11-30 22:19:52 +0000 UTC]

Cool! Β I kinda think that all mecha should have fully articulated hands and arms, so they can serve a variety of functions. Β No real point in them just being walking tanks.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Shimmering-Sword In reply to WILDMUSTANGX [2017-12-01 00:37:46 +0000 UTC]

For where you statement ends, I can point you to how you started: Because they're cool

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

Sentinel373 [2017-11-30 22:02:21 +0000 UTC]

i've got one of those

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Shimmering-Sword In reply to Sentinel373 [2017-12-01 00:36:31 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

ShadowRaven2006 [2017-11-30 21:23:20 +0000 UTC]

Love this so very very much.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Shimmering-Sword In reply to ShadowRaven2006 [2017-12-01 00:36:22 +0000 UTC]

Thanks.

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

spacewolflord [2017-11-30 20:48:48 +0000 UTC]

Great looking as always.Β  Have you hear that Harmony Gold might lose its latest law suit against Piranha Games and Harebrained Schemes?
www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3Z3-y…

Thank you as always for sharing.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Shimmering-Sword In reply to spacewolflord [2017-12-01 00:36:12 +0000 UTC]

They were always likely to lose, other than Weisman not being allowed to touch the unseen.

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

erdervv [2017-11-30 20:40:02 +0000 UTC]

I like this one, a lot, it reminds me of that guy from "the 9th company" that says tanks are beautiful because they are simple and have nothing more than wat it's needed in their design, this shadow hawk is the same: it's simple yet beautiful.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Shimmering-Sword In reply to erdervv [2017-12-01 00:31:26 +0000 UTC]

Yep. I think it's important to have some mechs really show their utilitarian, efficient nature.

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

stormeris [2017-11-30 19:23:53 +0000 UTC]

Mediocrity never looked better.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Shimmering-Sword In reply to stormeris [2017-11-30 19:24:59 +0000 UTC]

Lol.

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

Zax19taken [2017-11-30 19:16:45 +0000 UTC]

The good old microwave head x)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Shimmering-Sword In reply to Zax19taken [2017-11-30 19:24:53 +0000 UTC]

Heh.

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

Heretic1311 [2017-11-30 18:15:07 +0000 UTC]

Very nice take on a classic.
I like the Shadow Hawk in MWO, but this slightly angles cockpit looks more dynamic.
For a medium, thatΒ΄s probably the better choice, as that class is not supposed to be static.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Shimmering-Sword In reply to Heretic1311 [2017-11-30 19:24:39 +0000 UTC]

I say you could go either way. Your reasoning is solid, though there's also the trooper aesthetic side of looking rugged and easily repairable.

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

Heretic1311 In reply to Shimmering-Sword [2017-11-30 19:49:03 +0000 UTC]

Even troopers can look speedy.
But i get your point.
Still i like what you delivered.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

The-Colonel-382 [2017-11-30 18:11:29 +0000 UTC]

Already got my mini of this one. 😁

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Shimmering-Sword In reply to The-Colonel-382 [2017-11-30 19:23:17 +0000 UTC]

Nice! If you're ever looking for more, the coming box set version is a somewhat improved sculpt.

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

The-Colonel-382 In reply to Shimmering-Sword [2017-11-30 20:24:54 +0000 UTC]

Ohhhh

Any ideas as to a release date? Or does that fall under the dreaded NDA coverage. 😁

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Shimmering-Sword In reply to The-Colonel-382 [2017-12-01 00:29:18 +0000 UTC]

It'll first come with the new intro box. No solid ETA.

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

The-Colonel-382 In reply to Shimmering-Sword [2017-12-01 00:52:37 +0000 UTC]

Blargh.
Ah well.
Guess I’ll just have to wait.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

fecler [2017-11-30 18:03:49 +0000 UTC]

2nd favorite mech in the franchise.Β 
damn is it beautiful.Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Shimmering-Sword In reply to fecler [2017-11-30 19:22:04 +0000 UTC]

Glad you like it

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

SergeantBiscuits [2017-11-30 17:42:17 +0000 UTC]

Might be my favorite so far. He looks like a tough little bastard! He'll pester you with that shoulder-mounted ER PPC, then SRM-salvo you if you get too close.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Shimmering-Sword In reply to SergeantBiscuits [2017-11-30 17:48:11 +0000 UTC]

On the right variant, yeah that can be a ppc
Definitely not my favorite of the bunch, but not the worst either. Definitely looks better as a miniature.

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

Harusame1982 [2017-11-30 17:34:34 +0000 UTC]

I du not know but I think the Boxface would really be better.
This one it sort of looks ok-ish, but the boxed cowl would be better.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>