HOME | DD

Tayzonrai β€” Why Don't They Evolve?

Published: 2012-06-27 04:48:19 +0000 UTC; Views: 17196; Favourites: 304; Downloads: 21
Redirect to original
Description All of this is very confusing...

I TAKE REQUESTS, SO GIVE ME A NOTE IF YOU HAVE AN IDEA.
Related content
Comments: 187

Number3636 In reply to ??? [2012-11-12 15:58:21 +0000 UTC]

Well that's how I work, glad you appreciate it and aren't freaking out on me like some people would.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tayzonrai In reply to Number3636 [2012-11-12 16:37:34 +0000 UTC]

No worries, I know how annoying those kind of people are.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

fox-fan [2012-10-06 18:39:20 +0000 UTC]

so true!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tayzonrai In reply to fox-fan [2012-10-06 21:04:32 +0000 UTC]

Indeed!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Krisipoke In reply to ??? [2012-08-25 10:25:41 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, because it would totally be logical if they completely changed the evolution of female Cacnea for no reason. They never made any new evolutions that could've been done in older games. Well, I think Piloswine could learn Ancientpower as an egg move before, so it could've evolved into a Mamoswine, but it's a bit different... There shouldn't exist any female Cacturne this way, so if somebody traded one over, that would be really weird. One last thought: there are many, many types of cacti in the world, there could be different cactus PokΓ©mon as well. I like the idea less that they haven't made a common prevolution for Miltank and Tauros. I mean, they are all female and all male, they represent the two genders of the same animal, and they even have the same base stats, just switched over.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tayzonrai In reply to Krisipoke [2012-08-25 10:31:11 +0000 UTC]

You do know that this is based entirely on opinion?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Krisipoke In reply to Tayzonrai [2012-08-25 23:25:35 +0000 UTC]

Of course
But still, I think it would have been pretty stupid if female Cacturne disappeared for no good reason

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tayzonrai In reply to Krisipoke [2012-08-25 23:30:43 +0000 UTC]

I see what you mean now

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Pidgey-Power In reply to ??? [2012-08-25 01:39:15 +0000 UTC]

Because they can and you should stop being butthurt.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tayzonrai In reply to Pidgey-Power [2012-08-25 10:20:56 +0000 UTC]

Meh! It's all opinion!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Mythicaldragon99 [2012-08-22 15:36:55 +0000 UTC]

exactly what I thought..

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SnivyMaster In reply to ??? [2012-08-22 15:06:23 +0000 UTC]

I agree on every single one. c:

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tayzonrai In reply to SnivyMaster [2012-08-22 15:09:43 +0000 UTC]

Really? You're pretty much the first!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SnivyMaster In reply to Tayzonrai [2012-08-22 17:37:03 +0000 UTC]

c:

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SirFranPan In reply to ??? [2012-08-15 19:35:55 +0000 UTC]

I totally get you on this. :I

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

poke-shapeshifter13 In reply to ??? [2012-08-13 03:43:33 +0000 UTC]

Luvdisc = heart fish

Alomomola = sun fish

need i say more about those 2?

Pachirisu andf Emolga? an Evolution line? that seems kinda stretchy knowing their stats :\ also, take note that unless there was some way to make a stone that makes regular pokemon able to gain flying type abilities, i doubt that Pachirisu will ever evolve into Emolga

also, the cacnea line is based off a different kind of cactus then the kind that Maractus is based off of. both of those kinds of cactus don't grow in the same area so there is no doubt that they would be seperate

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tayzonrai In reply to poke-shapeshifter13 [2012-08-13 09:04:15 +0000 UTC]

There's undoubtebly many things that make Luvdisc and Alomola similar, even if it's based on a sun fish.

Pachirisu and Emolga are very much alike (electric squirrels and you know, the cheeks) but you're right, they can't really evolve.

As for Maractus, two cactus-like Pokemon are enough, am I right?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

poke-shapeshifter13 In reply to Tayzonrai [2012-08-13 15:04:46 +0000 UTC]

even if they do look simular, you gotta realise that they just arn't gonna be the same. Gamefreak made the thing so they do whatever they want with it :\

i don't see Pachirisu and Emolga as evolutions for a reason, there would be no way for Pachirisu to gain the flying type

dude, the pokemon world has creatures that are based of things that are in our world and even the ideas of aliens, so you'd expect gamefreak to take into account the fact that there is more then one species of cactus

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tayzonrai In reply to poke-shapeshifter13 [2012-08-13 15:16:03 +0000 UTC]

I'm just saying they should evolve. You know, both of them being water types and heart-shaped and all...

I agreed with you with Pachirisu and Emolga, I realised it a long time ago.

I know, but it would be interesting!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

poke-shapeshifter13 In reply to Tayzonrai [2012-08-13 15:20:09 +0000 UTC]

well in times like that i would have to say that looks can be deceiving

i know you did, but i was just pointing out the flaw, no worries

maybe so, but it might not be possible

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tayzonrai In reply to poke-shapeshifter13 [2012-08-13 15:26:39 +0000 UTC]

Indeed... :ciondragonnod2:

Whoops!

I know! But it would be awesome!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

poke-shapeshifter13 In reply to Tayzonrai [2012-08-13 15:34:43 +0000 UTC]

like i said, no worries

idk how it would be awesome

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tayzonrai In reply to poke-shapeshifter13 [2012-08-13 18:23:17 +0000 UTC]

Tsk... They need more cross evolutions in my opinion. End of discussion.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

poke-shapeshifter13 In reply to Tayzonrai [2012-08-14 00:08:01 +0000 UTC]

well for that matter XD also, i personally think that Sableye needs an evolution

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tayzonrai In reply to poke-shapeshifter13 [2012-08-14 00:27:26 +0000 UTC]

Gasp! You continued the conversation! But anyway, yes, you're right! Same for Dunsparce!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

poke-shapeshifter13 In reply to Tayzonrai [2012-08-14 00:31:50 +0000 UTC]

i would have thought that Dunsparce, by apperance, was a Dragon type XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tayzonrai In reply to poke-shapeshifter13 [2012-08-14 00:38:14 +0000 UTC]

Genius sir, genius! Dunsparce as a dragon type:

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

poke-shapeshifter13 In reply to Tayzonrai [2012-08-14 01:02:46 +0000 UTC]

lol XD also, i have a question. what is your opinion on pokemon couples

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tayzonrai In reply to poke-shapeshifter13 [2012-08-14 01:04:20 +0000 UTC]

Do you mean the anime?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

poke-shapeshifter13 In reply to Tayzonrai [2012-08-14 01:20:32 +0000 UTC]

no, i mean as in pairing 2 different pokemon with each other

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tayzonrai In reply to poke-shapeshifter13 [2012-08-14 10:24:43 +0000 UTC]

You mean... putting two Pokemon together to make on sprite? Sorry, I never heard of that before!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

poke-shapeshifter13 In reply to Tayzonrai [2012-08-14 16:15:01 +0000 UTC]

no! i ment if you take two pokemon and show them in a way of the pokemon actually being in love with eachother

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tayzonrai In reply to poke-shapeshifter13 [2012-08-14 17:07:22 +0000 UTC]

Ohhhhh! I'm not exactly a fan, but I wouldn't say I hate them! just... meh!

Why'd you ask?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

poke-shapeshifter13 In reply to Tayzonrai [2012-08-15 00:06:54 +0000 UTC]

cause i wanted to know it you knew. speaking of which, i actually made a couple called DarkendLightShipping (SableyeXCelebi

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

agosiciliano In reply to poke-shapeshifter13 [2013-01-10 22:11:03 +0000 UTC]

But how would a legendary that lives in the ilex forest met a regular pokemon that lives in dark cave?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

poke-shapeshifter13 In reply to agosiciliano [2013-01-11 01:10:04 +0000 UTC]

well, Sableye do tend to wonder away from their original homes to find new homes and sableyes are no acception. i made it up to where a male Sableye had been curious enough to go wondering around the world from hoenn and met a female Celebi in ilex forest. the Sableye and Celebi had some fun times together and in time they fell in love. it's not impossible dude

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Tayzonrai In reply to Tayzonrai [2012-08-13 15:27:02 +0000 UTC]

*

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

learn2chillax In reply to ??? [2012-08-08 23:08:09 +0000 UTC]

lol good point for 1 and 3 but Pachi I'm not buying it so much but still XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tayzonrai In reply to learn2chillax [2012-08-08 23:11:46 +0000 UTC]

Yeah... They just... look the same.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

learn2chillax In reply to Tayzonrai [2012-08-08 23:12:59 +0000 UTC]

Yeah...you pointed it out for me...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

rubenimus21 In reply to ??? [2012-07-30 22:38:15 +0000 UTC]

pokemon logic....gotta love it

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

RihleeX In reply to ??? [2012-07-12 15:44:22 +0000 UTC]

Someone finally gets it

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

crimson-elegance In reply to ??? [2012-07-01 03:28:40 +0000 UTC]

I love every single Pokemon regardless, but I COMPLETELY agree. Except maybe for Pachirisu to Emolga. Not enough of a size difference.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ProfessorProficient In reply to ??? [2012-06-29 07:53:01 +0000 UTC]

What the fuck... I thought Luvdisc evolved into Alomomola!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tayzonrai In reply to ProfessorProficient [2012-06-29 17:14:28 +0000 UTC]

Nope.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SECRET-NINJA-SUPER-M In reply to ??? [2012-06-28 15:22:26 +0000 UTC]

I never even thought of the first or third ones!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Lily-Lyn-Rain In reply to ??? [2012-06-28 15:00:17 +0000 UTC]

Okay, I agree with the Luvdisc/Alomomola one, but as for the other's...
When most Pokemon evolve, their form becomes bigger and they look like an older version of the other, Pachirisu and Emolga look too much alike for that. They both look too young and playful.
And lastly... the main reason I think Cacnea doesn't evolve into Maractus is because they were based on two very different types of cactus. I think they're called a Nopal Cactus and a Opuntia Cactus, and I believe they are found in different deserts as well.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

maca33 In reply to ??? [2012-06-27 23:37:58 +0000 UTC]

true....

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

GauntletPorsche [2012-06-27 23:06:23 +0000 UTC]

Don't forget that Bouffalant should be an evolution of Tauros... except with an afro

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

poke-shapeshifter13 In reply to GauntletPorsche [2012-08-13 03:37:03 +0000 UTC]

except that wouldn't work cause boufalaunt is much slower then tauros

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


<= Prev | | Next =>