HOME | DD

Published: 2008-04-21 19:57:00 +0000 UTC; Views: 25320; Favourites: 507; Downloads: 912
Redirect to original
Description
TransitoriusYou can see the artpack at [link] or at the dA account (later).
Technical informations
Wallpaperpack (via download)
1024x768
1280x1024
1440x900
1600x1200
1920x1200
Thanks for favs, watches and comments
edit: changed some color things, sized upper left asteroid down, changed the flare and the beam of the gate (made it softer) and some little other changes, added wallpaperpack
Related content
Comments: 223
n0s-zero In reply to ??? [2008-04-21 22:58:40 +0000 UTC]
also ich hΓ€tte da wirklich gern nen wallie davon
mir gefΓ€llt der planet besonders gut, das muster ist echt geil : D
π: 0 β©: 1
TobiasRoetsch In reply to n0s-zero [2008-04-22 10:10:28 +0000 UTC]
danke ich denke es wird n wppack geben... haben genug danach gefragt
π: 0 β©: 1
shoof In reply to ??? [2008-04-21 22:47:24 +0000 UTC]
What did you mean the vehicle to be? It reminds me of a solar sail, but now I'm thinking more ramscoop...
π: 0 β©: 1
shoof In reply to TobiasRoetsch [2008-04-22 23:02:13 +0000 UTC]
haha, looks like I was pretty far off.
π: 0 β©: 0
Shir-Olorna In reply to ??? [2008-04-21 22:28:02 +0000 UTC]
When I watch this image, it looks like it would be done only by your pc, but you used wacom tablet here..xD
π: 0 β©: 1
ZZzenNN In reply to TobiasRoetsch [2008-04-22 10:58:36 +0000 UTC]
Great image......welcome
π: 0 β©: 0
AdamBurn In reply to ??? [2008-04-21 21:33:44 +0000 UTC]
That ship is amazing, really adds to the whole image
π: 0 β©: 1
MoonlitPredator In reply to ??? [2008-04-21 21:19:54 +0000 UTC]
Wow this is briliant man, love the background planets and that gateway type thing up front, WIN!!!
π: 0 β©: 1
Gate-To-Nowhere In reply to ??? [2008-04-21 21:07:25 +0000 UTC]
the colors are fantastic! Amazing work on the planets surface!
π: 0 β©: 1
TidalStorm In reply to ??? [2008-04-21 21:02:12 +0000 UTC]
The colour is awesome in this one, effects as well
π: 0 β©: 1
inSECTed In reply to ??? [2008-04-21 20:59:23 +0000 UTC]
Sick, cool colours and composition. Holds the eye and lets it wonder the page at the same time.
Planet texturing is really cool, and I love the lighting.
π: 0 β©: 1
zs-Lycan In reply to ??? [2008-04-21 20:48:36 +0000 UTC]
Looks great.
I like the green at the top.
π: 0 β©: 1
Poka-SorM In reply to ??? [2008-04-21 20:40:53 +0000 UTC]
WooW! Your work it's like the world i wanna be~ Amazing job!
π: 0 β©: 1
Amras-Arfeiniel In reply to ??? [2008-04-21 20:34:54 +0000 UTC]
mm irgendwas hat sich bei den letzten paar Bilder an deiner Technik geΓ€ndert oder bilde ich mir das nur ein? Deine Bilder sind klarer als frΓΌher.
Haben ein wenig was von Phoenix-06 's Bildern.
GefΓ€llt mir!
Ist das ein Schiff?
π: 0 β©: 1
TobiasRoetsch In reply to Amras-Arfeiniel [2008-04-22 10:24:21 +0000 UTC]
Hmmm kann schon sein dass sich was verΓ€ndert hat Versuche ja auch mich weiter zu entwickeln
Sollte eigentlich ein Gate sein
danke dir
π: 0 β©: 1
Amras-Arfeiniel In reply to TobiasRoetsch [2008-04-22 11:16:11 +0000 UTC]
Wie gesagt, die Entwicklung gefΓ€llt mir
Und ich hatte gedacht es ist eine Art organischen Schiff. Wie ein groΓen Qualle oder so. Die im Dunkeln leuchten.
π: 0 β©: 0
BlackBeltMaster [2008-04-21 20:24:37 +0000 UTC]
It looks like the Death Star. Awesomeness.
π: 0 β©: 1
Drunkerman In reply to ??? [2008-04-21 20:18:26 +0000 UTC]
Very nice man, there's some odd lighting but it's your first try experiment this seriously so i'll forgive ya and i don't usually ask for wallpapers but i think this time this piece of art will make my desk sexy
.
π: 0 β©: 1
x19a In reply to ??? [2008-04-21 20:17:17 +0000 UTC]
Truly incredible. The space theme you got going is wonderously aweing - the planet/ball-thingy in the back made me think of Star Wars, particularly Coruscant or the Death Star.
π: 0 β©: 1
mrgizzle In reply to ??? [2008-04-21 20:16:32 +0000 UTC]
Wie theinsidenoob schon gesagt hat: viel zu dunkel.
Davon abgesehen find ich es schon sehr stylisch. Endlich mal wat bunteres
Was macht das "L" unten rechts? oO
"L"uminati?
π: 0 β©: 1
TobiasRoetsch In reply to mrgizzle [2008-04-22 09:13:15 +0000 UTC]
Hmm auch bei dir kanns am Monitor liegen. Zuhause ist bei mir auch bissl dunkel, aber geht eigtl. Hier auf Arbeit siehts herrlich aus
Das L steht fΓΌr Luminarium... guck ma die links in der Description P
π: 0 β©: 0
SamODJ In reply to ??? [2008-04-21 20:15:51 +0000 UTC]
Glad to see you submit this. Just checked it out on The Luminarium web page and it caught my eye. So first, to get it out of the way: /applause
I think this piece demonstrates a much more captivating use of light than I have seen in your other works. The lightsource has a fair bit of bloom that makes it seem more realistic and dynamic. Also the composition is almost spot on, with some clever choices concerned the planet placement.
But i'm going to nit pick, I guess because I can, heh.
Firstly, the colour. Green is always dangerous to work with: I know that from personal experience. But of course because of its lack of popularity in this genre, it often seems very striking at first. That is what I saw when I first viewed this. However, looking at it again I would be inclined to suggest you tone it down. There are some nasty colour issues surrounding the immediate area of the flare, where they band off into yellow too quickly (very noticeable where the top asteroid is.) There are also hints of this in the BG space, where the yellows and greens are too saturated for eachother and as such don't merge as they should. I think the easiest remedy would be to tone down either the green, or tone down the yellow, because atm, with them both so so saturated, they clash in places. (admittedly they work in others, such as the planet's surface to atmosphere mix.)
Second qualm I have is with the odd flare artifact protruding from the lightsource (these large beams of light.) They seem unrealistic, and a little like a flashy add on. Have confidence in the feel of the flare itself, I think it holds the dynamic without needing the inclusion of these flare diffractions, which seem a problem rather than an asset.
I'm not really sure what the orange object is at the bottom (ship?) but I can't say the design is working for me because I simply find it hard to know what it is. Heh, I know you won't remove it or anything seeing as I imagine it is integral to your vision of the work, but still it may be something to think about. When it comes to ships, I find it pays to have it easily recognisable, such as in Gary Tonge's Arrival [link] or even your friend Gucken's To Our Destiny [link] In those works, the ships worked tremendously well in conveying depth and scale.
My last point would be the large asteroids at the top of the image. The general feel of the asteroid belt is good, it works and strongly ties up the composition between the planet and moon (which is strongly implemented anyway) but the largest two asteroids actually screw up the scale of the work; they seem as though they are sat in between the planet and the moon which would make them huge...obviously I assume this was not the intention but it definitely feels that way.
Well, I'll leave it at that. It is a good work, and I hope you recognise the weaker aspects of the image as to improve. I'm excited to see where you will go with your work next.
π: 0 β©: 1
TobiasRoetsch In reply to SamODJ [2008-04-22 09:03:00 +0000 UTC]
Monstercomment
First part: yea green isn't an easy colour but that's why I've chosen it. I'll try to tone it down, maybe it looks better
Second part: hmm you mensioned those lightbeams at my last pic too. I think it's just you. Some people like those beams, others don't like them .
The thing at the bottom should be a gate. Maybe you recognise Cor Tauri (one of my works) through the gate. It was a first try to paint such an object... I'm going to improve my skills
To the asteroids: I'll try downsizing those both.
Thanks a lot for your fav and your honest critics Sam
π: 0 β©: 1
SamODJ In reply to TobiasRoetsch [2008-04-22 13:10:55 +0000 UTC]
Oh its a gate?! My bad, heh.
Um yeh, with that last piece I picked up more on the diffraction spikes (they were more classically done.) I have no problem with diffraction spikes per sΓ©, in fact i'm quite inclined to say I enjoy using them myself, but here they kinda look like they were generated in some 3D program. The reason I say it may be better to remove them is I think this particular lightsource, in this piece, in this setup, is more than able to stand on its own.
But hey, each to their own.
π: 0 β©: 1
TobiasRoetsch In reply to SamODJ [2008-04-22 13:20:11 +0000 UTC]
Hehe yea back at home I'm going to test it without the lightbeam
π: 0 β©: 0
<= Prev | | Next =>