HOME | DD

TomCatDriver — 2 Bladed Sword

Published: 2008-01-18 08:06:23 +0000 UTC; Views: 663; Favourites: 12; Downloads: 46
Redirect to original
Description top aft view of Chance Vought F7U-1 Cutlass,showing unusual tailless twin-fin planview of this semi-experimental fighter while in service with the US Navy Blue Angels display team in 1952. the Cutlass was derived from a 1944 German design by Junkers and was the first US Navy jet to use a primitive form of afterburners. primary airframe was constructed of Metalite,a sandwich material of thin aluminum skin bonded to both sides of a core end-grain cut balsa wood,a patented material developed by Vought.
Related content
Comments: 94

focallength In reply to ??? [2008-02-07 13:49:35 +0000 UTC]

Once I have the room.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TomCatDriver In reply to focallength [2008-02-08 10:58:48 +0000 UTC]

just don,t take too long,we,re not getting any younger......!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

focallength In reply to TomCatDriver [2008-02-08 14:33:20 +0000 UTC]

I'm working on it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TomCatDriver In reply to focallength [2008-02-08 23:55:24 +0000 UTC]

so am i. if i can,t get a variance here,i may just sell and move to another county.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

focallength In reply to TomCatDriver [2008-02-09 00:56:13 +0000 UTC]

That is an alternative.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TomCatDriver In reply to focallength [2008-02-09 01:17:42 +0000 UTC]

somewhere south of EWR,a dollar goes a lot farther for property,lower taxes,and the building codes just aren,t so strict.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

focallength In reply to TomCatDriver [2008-02-09 02:12:58 +0000 UTC]

Way south.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TomCatDriver In reply to focallength [2008-02-09 02:31:08 +0000 UTC]

not too far,but within convienient commuting distance.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

focallength In reply to TomCatDriver [2008-02-09 03:12:25 +0000 UTC]

Here's hoping.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TomCatDriver In reply to focallength [2008-02-09 05:12:25 +0000 UTC]

and that you can get a bigger and better place too.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

focallength In reply to TomCatDriver [2008-02-09 05:33:59 +0000 UTC]

Definitely.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TomCatDriver In reply to focallength [2008-02-09 15:56:09 +0000 UTC]

nothing must stand in the way of model-building!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

focallength In reply to TomCatDriver [2008-02-09 16:44:52 +0000 UTC]

Amen.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TomCatDriver In reply to focallength [2008-02-09 17:40:59 +0000 UTC]

not even my marriage.....such as it is.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

focallength In reply to TomCatDriver [2008-02-09 18:19:37 +0000 UTC]

Bummer.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TomCatDriver In reply to focallength [2008-02-09 18:57:00 +0000 UTC]

i,ll survive.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

focallength In reply to TomCatDriver [2008-02-09 19:13:14 +0000 UTC]

I don't doubt that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TomCatDriver In reply to focallength [2008-02-10 02:22:01 +0000 UTC]

tough old cat.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

focallength In reply to TomCatDriver [2008-02-10 02:41:56 +0000 UTC]

Yup.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TomCatDriver In reply to focallength [2008-02-10 06:48:59 +0000 UTC]

XD!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

focallength In reply to TomCatDriver [2008-02-10 15:19:56 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Zepherus In reply to ??? [2008-01-22 18:06:13 +0000 UTC]

Well, I have to say the plane is ugly, but the model is excellent.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TomCatDriver In reply to Zepherus [2008-01-22 18:53:32 +0000 UTC]

depends on which angle you look at it from. from some angles,the Cutlass almost looked like an F-14. way ahead of it,s time!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zepherus In reply to TomCatDriver [2008-01-22 21:55:28 +0000 UTC]

Well from the back it is ugly.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TomCatDriver In reply to Zepherus [2008-01-23 08:30:22 +0000 UTC]

just a bit. but not from all angles.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zepherus In reply to TomCatDriver [2008-01-24 04:12:31 +0000 UTC]

From the side and front it is ok...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TomCatDriver In reply to Zepherus [2008-01-24 11:33:23 +0000 UTC]

might be worth trying again,with modern engines and composite materials........

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zepherus In reply to TomCatDriver [2008-01-25 03:27:42 +0000 UTC]

Probably with work better.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TomCatDriver In reply to Zepherus [2008-01-25 03:48:38 +0000 UTC]

it was basically a good design,aerodynamically. just too far ahead of the available engines and structural materials of the late 40s.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bear48 In reply to ??? [2008-01-19 02:04:39 +0000 UTC]

this is great

so very cool

Nice job

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TomCatDriver In reply to bear48 [2008-01-19 02:21:06 +0000 UTC]

nasty little job to make this one. a major conversion using a vacuform kit.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bear48 In reply to TomCatDriver [2008-01-19 02:38:27 +0000 UTC]

I see

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TomCatDriver In reply to bear48 [2008-01-19 06:05:14 +0000 UTC]

tough little bugger to make/convert,but it was used by the Blue Angels in some of their public displays,thus a part of the team.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bear48 In reply to TomCatDriver [2008-01-19 06:06:58 +0000 UTC]

Cool

thank you for the info

Tell me more about how you did the convertion

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TomCatDriver In reply to bear48 [2008-01-19 06:49:30 +0000 UTC]

i had to use some leftover drop-tanks for the forward fuselage,and a lot of filler-putty and sheet styrene to reshape the countours,also had to piece together a totally different set of landing gear. the kit i started out with was of an F7U-3{1956-57},and it needed to be backdated to an F7U-1{1952}version. Lindberg did make 2 earlier Cutlass kits,but they were in the wrong scales{1/48,1/96} needed for this collection.{1/72}

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bear48 In reply to TomCatDriver [2008-01-19 07:24:07 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TomCatDriver In reply to bear48 [2008-01-19 10:12:42 +0000 UTC]

meow.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Garnet-43 In reply to ??? [2008-01-18 12:35:31 +0000 UTC]

How unusual. Did 'Metalite' ever (pardon the pun) take off? In other words, was it ever widely used in aircraft?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TomCatDriver In reply to Garnet-43 [2008-01-18 20:46:40 +0000 UTC]

only a few Vought designs actually used it as a primary structural material, the Cutlass and the F6U Pirate,their first jet-powered types,also the XF5U Flying Flapjack,a saucer-shaped design that reached prototype stage,but was sadly scrapped before it was ever test flown in 1947. i think Metalite was used for some small parts on other planes as well.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Garnet-43 In reply to TomCatDriver [2008-01-18 22:43:44 +0000 UTC]

Flying Flapjack? I assume that saucer-shaped aircraft have some fundamental disadvantage over conventionally shaped planes, or we'd be seeing flying saucers in the sky.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TomCatDriver In reply to Garnet-43 [2008-01-18 23:47:56 +0000 UTC]

the XF-5U had a lot of potential,a prewar Vought wood and fabric prototype called the V-173"Zimmer-Skimmer" demonstrated some exceptional flying abilities,and encouraged Vought and the Navy to pursue the concept further with a larger,heavier and far more powerful version,with heavy armament. but WWII ended before the project was completed,also it was a prop-job,and jets were showing far greater promise for the future.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Garnet-43 In reply to TomCatDriver [2008-01-19 00:21:59 +0000 UTC]

Also, with the names 'FlapJack' and 'Zimmer-Skimmer' they sound more like jokes than serious projects!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TomCatDriver In reply to Garnet-43 [2008-01-19 00:30:34 +0000 UTC]

funny names,yes,but serious projects deep down. if it had been produced,the Flapjack probably would have worked very well too,aboard carriers. very compact,and with a very slow landing speed,almost hanging from it,s propellers,like a helicopter.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


<= Prev |