HOME | DD
wwwarea — The Right to Self Defence - The Truth?
#alpha #bigot #bullying #fetishes #freedom #furries #internet #myths #omega #sexuality #slander #social #speech #stamp #truth #cyberbullying #wolfaboo #remradioheadfan96 #wwwarea #explanation #misconceptions
Published: 2015-07-14 01:54:54 +0000 UTC; Views: 9610; Favourites: 86; Downloads: 5
Redirect to original
Description
UPDATE
Can someone please flag this slander and cyberbullying content on Youtube? www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6VEHt…
I flagged it as bullying, and explained that slander is illegal.
These guys do not know what bullying, wolfaboo, etc. is.
EDIT IN UPDATE (7/17/2015 - night): The video is gone.
ALSO, when I add the 'NEW:' parts, please note that each one will be after a certain amount of people adding this to favorites. Just to avoid another misunderstanding. Need to be safe. This includes this update here. Edit: I edited the update on 7/16/2015 and will add this:
The 'NEW' list will have dates by them, some may not be very clear though.
UPDATE DONE
May I suggest looking at this too?
www.deviantart.com/art/U-told-…
Some parts sound very similar to what happened to me.
OK, I know this section is about me, but if anyone keeps listening to there offensive crap, slander, etc. I want you to hear me out.
First of all, I have the RIGHT to defend myself, and defending yourself and/or bringing out rude things of other people is NOT bullying, nor is it "attacking".
Second, before anyone thinks, I suggest looking here:
General Message About the Past 3 Months - UPDATE 3
≈═■▪■═╣Myths and Facts About Me╠═■▪■═≈
NEW: "You created this drama yourself" (7/16/2015)
No. Did I choose to make that video about me, choose to make that article, choose to make so much bigoted, untrue and slander about me, etc?
No I didn't. Those sick people are trying to blame the victim again, in a "You made me do this too you!" fashion.
"You're a bully/cyberbully."
Now how am I a bully?
I been called a "bully" for standing up for myself, and standing up for others. I also been called one for simply bringing out there rude behavior over people not them.
I brought a person out for trying to humiliate others for having a 'fetish' over random things. But that's called constructive criticism, and for defending purposes
I been attacked and humiliated for having a different opinion about imaginary things.
I do not (or at least try a lot to not):
- Make ED articles over random individuals
- Mock, shame, etc. people for any part of their sexuality (This counts to 'fetishes' too)
- Tell people what to think about themselves just because I said so
- Bash furries
- Slut-shame
- Upload things like this , this , this , or even this for example. (btw, at least one of those contain defamatory.)
- Mock, defame, humilate, expose secrets, insult, or some others about individuals publicly (All is not a requirement) for what they do, what they like, etc.
- Depend on the majority about other people in a negative way
- Force my personal opinions about a movie on others
- More
"You're a wolfaboo!"
Now while Humanaboo is the mirror side of Wolfaboo, I apparently did defend 'Wolfaboo' at least until I heard that 'Wolfaboo' is meant to be about speciesism (just like Humanaboo), and that you must be OVER-obsessed with wolves and other requirements.
Though some say it's about treating wolves as equal (WTF?! Why is that "bad"?)?, but heard it's really about treating wolves as superior. I'm NOT so sure about this one: Official Wolfaboo Definition
Though, this does have some superior claim and of course, OVER-obsessed things. Like simply being 'obsessed' =/= wolfaboo. It's much more. Even Bean said something like that to me (Correct me if wrong of course).
Besides, me falling in love with 'imaginary' anthropomorphic talking wolves from a 'wolf movie' and personality like them as 'Gods' it's self, doesn't make me a wolfaboo.
I even acknowledge that RL wolves here is very different maybe. Though I DO believe that yes, not all wolves are dangerous (And I think it's stereotype to say they are too, just as much as the opposite) and they CAN learn from humans , and may have 'secret spirits' like you know, that cool 'animal spiritually' thing?
btw, I know a bully who denies news (which reports actual science research too) and continue to cause more bigoted views.
"You attack people who don't like this Alpha and Omega movie!"
Now when the flying f*** did I actually ATTACK anyone for not liking this movie? Oh wait, because I wanted to disagree with some reviewers? Because I wanted to simply argue them, and give my opinion back? Since when is giving actual disagreement an "attack"? And considering, I am allowed to do that, especially to unfair criticism.
"But you attacked an anti-Alpha-and-Omega group!"
Well maybe it's because the group allowed to give an opinion on it? And that it was more of a 'disapproval' opinion and criticism? And considering the one who made the group went to actual fan groups and attacked them, and forcing the hatred opinion on others who liked it? And tried to get people who were not forcing anyone 'there thing' to read that hate message about fans, while fans on the other hand, DON'T make others like it. Or for that one harmless side.
I'll admit, I might of reacted a bit 'too much' about that group, like when I said 'Go boycott it' during an upload or something. I think I deleted that. But remember, the guy who made the group pretty much was not behaving about it either. And called all fans 'autistic wolfaboos', yes, an offensive anti-disability message and offensive directly to fans. While at least some fans didn't do that to those who simply disliked it.
And besides, during that time and outside of the time, I never once MADE ANYONE actually LIKE it. I was completely fine for those who disliked it I think, but there is a difference of 'disliking' vs 'going out and acting on that'. And take a guess of what I was focusing on. Go on, take a guess...
"You are a bad person for defending furries and fetishes!"
How am I a bad person for defending Freedom of Expression?
Simply being a furry and/or having a 'fetish' as one or not, doesn't hurt anyone, but trying to shame people for being either one (or both) does hurt, and according to a lot of psychology research, 'Emotional Abuse' is linked to 'actual pain'.
I'm sorry, but if people are allowed to talk crap about people with a harmless 'fetish', then I'm sure those people are allowed to talk bad about you back, or stand up for themselves. (or both).
Note: The only reason why they call them "sick" is because it's not their fetish, and that maybe they depend on the majority, which btw, is all just biases, which is clearly no different than a anti-gay/hetero person going out and calling 'Homosexuality and Heterosexual' sick.
I see no different as they are both based off the same 'personality'.
If having (for example) a 'furry fatty' fetish is disgusting, then it's clearly fair for me to say that "Two humans kissing is far worse than scat" then. They are both valid as they are all based off personality traits then. And no, 'popularity' =/= good argument. Who said it is?
"But you defend ALL fetishes, and that includes pedophile!"
Let's preach again: Having a fetish is fine, as long if you don't go out and bloody hurt ANYONE. And that includes the so-called 'common' stuff.
The only pedophiles I would defend are: Those who don't go out and hurt, and/or those who regret. And I accept based off some criticism out there that arresting someone for doing something completely 'fictional' is f***ed up. Because nobody should be arrested for something so bloody victimless! It's wrong! It's just arresting someone for only thought-crime.
Seriously, and hell, I'm not the only one who has this idea as a careful thinker. (Well sometimes I'm not careful on everything)
"Fetishes are risky, so therefor, it's bad to have any one; bad to defend it"
In the common heterosexual and homosexual world, there is so much more rape reports than those having a 'foot fetish', I'm sure.
But I'm sure it's about control in all. If I had to blame something you can control, then you might as well ban kids (so they don't get raped), ban traffic to avoid accidencts, ban ALL sexualities including Homosexuality and Heterosexuality, etc.
"You're not perfect"
That's obvious due to some actual mistakes, but neither are you. (Yes, this myth is true)
Now how on earth does using Freedom of Speech to defend something you hate violate yours? Are you bloody serious?!
"You're a bigot!"
For trying my best to argue? If that's true anyway, then everybody is a bigot!
"You're obese because your diabetic!"
I found this in a so-called "fact" list on that non-joke page about me. Apparently the OP creates the stereotype that all diabetics are 'fat'.
I am Type 1. Type 1 doesn't have a known cause, and this can happen to even skinny people. Though because of Type 1, I do suffer some weight issues now. But I'm still not what you think an obese person looks like...
"You're Selfish, Egoist, and 'Self-Centered'"
More bullcrap about me.
I don't really understand why someone thinks I'm those things for defending myself, disagreeing with people, and defending my friends.
"Yeah, I'm a really horrible person for doing that." *sarcasm*
"You don't back up any arguments!"
Umm, remember the time I linked to news side that actually had USEFUL information, news of actual science reports, definitions, etc?
"You are just like yourself on Fanpop"
Perhaps I cannot change my fights for Freedom and such.
But I never went back on there and did the same thing. The only thing I defend is idea of bypassing your ban just for the sake of your life, but only at the same time, regretting what you did and trying to start over yourself, even though Fanpop doesn't like ban evaders. But morally, I find nothing wrong with that.
As for here, I am allowed to make journals and stand up for myself, to avoid bullcrap about me, etc. It's within my rights, I have the Free Speech to speak up for myself, and etc.
For doing that, I am considered the "same person". Wow.
"You're delusional!"
How am I delusional? Anyone who said that to me, just wants to say it because they can't stand it when someone makes a good point about them.
Considering too, I was also called "delusional" for believing in the right to suicide.
NEW: "You support bestiality because you define four legged creatures as anthropomorphic!" (Somewhere between 7/16/2015 and 7/14/2015 I think)
K, first of all, there actually is evidence of consent after doing research as a person who questions taboos, (and apparently the other way around is real, should that guy really be considered a rapist?)
But apparently, bestiality is actually a means to a creature who is 100% NOT human. If a four legged creature happens to talk, (especially show other human characteristics), then guess what? It doesn't count as bestiality. The feel and relationship seems to lean toward a creature who's really more different than a "dumb" animal (RL non-human animals) that has the same feelings as a human or beyond. Regardless of that, if they can talk like a human, then that should obviously be accepted by consent.
It does NOT MATTER if they 'Look' like a very different shape, what matters is the consent, and that's it. Otherwise, why the fuck should you judge an 'intelligent' looking creature that crosses species? It's still just a "human" inside of another shape's body. Just like walking dogs.
AND CONSIDERING, a walking anthropomorphic has 'parts' of an animal while this is kinda the same thing.
NEW: "__________John was right about wwwarea" (7/17/2015 - night)
He could never figure out how to make his claim "right".
Please don't ever listen to him (And I have the right to say that as he is involving me/my business)., he also accepted slanderous things about me, including a murder desire slander (Truth, I do not want to), made horrid harassing encouragement comments about me: comments.deviantart.com/1/5467… , (May report in ticket soon), and the fact that he keeps pretending his opinion is "right" over me, and etc.
He cannot argue, but he keeps dictating people about me just because, he thinks his opinion is "fact" over me when it can be argued that it's not, but he refuse to accept any debating; so in all, he's bigoted; look up "bigoted meaning" on Google.
He thinks I'm a "bad person" for making stamps, standing up against rude behavior against me (Standing up for myself), pretends I'm the same person from 'Fanpop', etc, etc. And his only possible argument is "Because he depends on 'who' and 'why'; he doesn't like it when I give my word.
BTW, if he says anything about me, then I am allowed to say anything about him back.
And sorry but I had to post this.
NEW: "I want to kill humans" (7/17/2015 - night)
Now when the hell did I say that? Because I am a misanthropic ? Being a misanthropic =/= want to kill.
NEW: "You're not a victim" (7/17/2015 - night)
I didn't start it with the ED article, the video, etc. And sure, I made a mistake about the death thing, but I'm still one as I'm not the one who upload journals, articles, snapshots, etc, etc. about others in negative opinion ways.
EXAMPLE: I am a victim in THIS .
NEW: "You're a loony for what you believe in!" (9/13/2015 - night)
Apparently I been considered a "loony" by horrible people online (Including those who promote cyberbullying articles that advocate harassment, stalking, bigotry, etc).
All because I was being more open minded and more of a possible free thinker in spirituality, science, and maybe religion (sort of? idk).
Anyway, since when is it "loony" for having beliefs based off evidence, spiritual possibilities, and maybe more? It's natural and normal to reach this far out, and it's not delusional to be open minded by having faith based off evidence.
Clearly nobody clearly knows (maybe) about the spiritual world, souls, etc. Anyone callings someone "loony" for having "new" ideas makes that 'someone' who claims that, a huge selfish rabid brat as he/she are claiming he/she know everything about it when he/she doesn't and considering the way this spirituality free thinking goes, is no different than how other spiritual theories get formed. - Something almost off: We have the traditional way of meditating, but new ideas came and suggest that you can meditate by laying down in bed.
2/24/2017 I had to remove this part.
NEW: "You're a wolfaboo and a bad person involving Bobsheaux!" (4/24/2018)
Because no one on the other part of the deal other than me and Another-Realm has removed their stuff mentioning me and anyone else on the side, and because some people are still reading messages mentioning me and some people have this sense of believing I'm some "bad" person, this message deserves to be here.
I didn't do anything wrong other than anything that might of been a mistake involving him. I have simply disagreed with many of his points, and made journals thinking he was an open minded person and called out anything stifling creativity, and I also called him out for spreading FALSE information about me, and has merely made more stamps simply having my own opinions in general about how many critics can stifle creativity. I am allowed to do that.
But Bobsheaux made many mistakes:
Bobsheaux has libeled me so many times.
Took something out of proportion (journal explaining why he was a cyberbully, hid the part where it explained why, then it made people think I called him that because of reviews maybe).
Supported personal attacks.
May have supported suicide aiding to some people.
Stole art and put a random story that wasn't the intention of the art.
Lied.
Claims he doesn't stifle creativity but actually does according to many comments for example.
Violated the no drama deal several times.
Violated what may have been a no cyberbullying rule on DeviantArt.
Starts more drama with me.
And maybe more.
__________________
UPDATE 9/22/2018
Going back to the argument that involves "bestiality", I also believe some of those that can't talk can still give consent by other forms of clear messages (e.g. thinking like a human or close and carefully signing consent forms of marriage I guess). Sorry for the message being slightly off now... UPDATE DONE
Anyway, I been attacked for providing multiverse evidence, spiritual world evidence, and wonders, etc. by people who depend on popular belief, other bigotry, etc.
Please don't ever depend on those people.
----------------------------
And of course, there is more other things about me that's wrong. And of course, I am allowed to handle this, as this is my business.
Please also note, that I have made some mistakes on DA too, so don't expect me to be perfect.
I want to warn anyone who sees anyone talk about me.
They will twist up many meanings, etc. about me. Try to show you snapshots of behavior that aren't even bad (Despite a couple of possible mistakes I've done), but tries to effect your emotions on trying to make it look "bad", etc.
They will try to say that I'm "wrong", "bad", etc. just because I am 'whining' about this, even though I have the right to, and since that doesn't debunk anything, etc.
Be warned, they will also say things about me in a 'just because' form; meaning they will say call me "delusional" without any good links, comparisons, etc.
They may also defend their bullying content as "critique" which clearly makes no sense at all. Critique isn't: Mocking, defame, and.. you know the others.
-----------------------
In the end, here, I have the RIGHT to be concern about my own social life, and I have the right to be VERY concern, no matter how "crazy" it seems the trolls, cyberbullies, etc.
Please understand anyone that I am just worried about myself, people seeing garbage about me, my personal likes, etc.
This is my life to worry about, and I have a reason to protect it.
And honestly, this crap about me was making me very upset, very depressed, etc.
I may also add more stuff too here.
___________________________________________________
Stamp Template - kencho.deviantart.com/art/Stam…
I have a feeling I forgot which template it was. Oh well, I didn't make the template part for sure.
I think this one might of been edited. Not sure if I have the correct credit..
Related content
Comments: 89
Thanks. I am still scared about that though. I don't think anyone I personality know knows about it yet. I often don't talk about this drama with them. Other people may also find it and believe that I am "wrong" just because of what the ED page said about me.
But I am thinking of talking to this one guy online who helps people out.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NOTE: When I said "but I'm still one as I'm not the one who upload journals, articles, snapshots, etc, etc. about others in negative opinion ways."
I meant in the first place.
I am afraid that I have an edit limit...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Added more myths and explanations.
NEW: "__________John was right about wwwarea" (7/17/2015 - night)
He could never figure out how to make his claim "right".
Please don't ever listen to him (And I have the right to say that as he is involving me/my business)., he also accepted slanderous things about me, including a murder desire slander (Truth, I do not want to), made horrid harassing encouragement comments about me: comments.deviantart.com/1/5467… , (May report in ticket soon), and the fact that he keeps pretending his opinion is "right" over me, and etc.
He cannot argue, but he keeps dictating people about me just because, he thinks his opinion is "fact" over me when it can be argued that it's not, but he refuse to accept any debating; so in all, he's bigoted; look up "bigoted meaning" on Google.
He thinks I'm a "bad person" for making stamps, standing up against rude behavior against me (Standing up for myself), pretends I'm the same person from 'Fanpop', etc, etc. And his only possible argument is "Because he depends on 'who' and 'why'; he doesn't like it when I give my word.
BTW, if he says anything about me, then I am allowed to say anything about him back.
And sorry but I had to post this.
NEW: "I want to kill humans" (7/17/2015 - night)
Now when the hell did I say that? Because I am a misanthropic ? Being a misanthropic =/= want to kill.
NEW: "You're not a victim" (7/17/2015 - night)
I didn't start it with the ED article, the video, etc. And sure, I made a mistake about the death thing, but I'm still one as I'm not the one who upload journals, articles, snapshots, etc, etc. about others in negative opinion ways.
EXAMPLE: I am a victim in THIS .
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Sorry this is happening to you. I never understood why people would randomly just attack people and make journals about them just because they stood up for themselves or had a different opinion. If it makes you feel any better, I haven't seen any of these journals attacking you or have heard any rumors about you, so maybe the hate is dying down or it hasn't spread very far.
Anyway, as long as you don't go out and start harassing people or anything then you're still pretty cool to me
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Thanks.
If you search 'wwwarea', and go to newest, you will see a lot of them. At least not much recently if you mean that. xD
btw, here is one of the worst journals about me: It contains plenty of slander, and a really awful slander in the title:
jaredthefox92.deviantart.com/j…
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You're welcome dear,
What I meant was I haven't seen anything mean about you randomly floating around on the site unless I actually look you up so that means that the hate hasn't spread very far.
I have looked you up and I hated everything that I saw about what people said about you. Most of it is just plain rude and unnecessary. Yes, people, even you and even me, make mistakes. But attacking someone like they are, especially the journal you showed me, is even worse then the actual mistake. They are only making the situation worse by making you look like a human hating wolfaboo who supports pedophila, which I know isn't true, and are only spreading lies and hate about you even though they either don't truly know you or just hate because you have a different opinion then they do. It is wrong and I'm sorry that this is happening to you.
If someone takes things too far and you want to rant about them or if you just want someone to talk to then my notes are always open to you. I understand what's it's liked to be hated for no reason and I will happily be a friend to talk to or a shoulder to cry on if you need me to be
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Thank you so much for understanding, and this is a very interesting part:
"Yes, people, even you and even me, make mistakes. But attacking someone like they are, especially the journal you showed me, is even worse then the actual mistake. They are only making the situation worse"
This is something they never seem to have in mind in one part maybe.
Just to be more clear, I did say on this stamp that I only defend those 'pedos' who: Don't go out and hurt children, and/or regret.
I also have a general dislike about our own race, but it's more like a "I generally hate society for what they did to so many". xD
And thanks.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah I read the description, I just meant that you don't support the actual action of pedophilia and wouldn't go out and kill all humans if you could just because you hate what some of them do.
And you're welcome ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Added another one:
NEW: "You created this drama yourself"
No. Did I choose to make that video about me, choose to make that article, choose to make so much bigoted, untrue and slander about me, etc?
No I didn't. Those sick people are trying to blame the victim again, in a "You made me do this too you!" fashion.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Personally I don't agree with the pedophile thing since kids shouldn't be a fetish, however I do agree with your stamp.
A lot of people try to start rumors about me, and some idiot even made a hate stamp of me (Which he took down out of fear of his own ass getting banned), and it had all these statements about me that were inaccurate.
and some idiot who blocked me claimed I blocked her, even though she's not even on my block list. lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well it was based off an argument of about the main moral of interference. But alright. At least I don't want to be viewed as a bad person for having my own opinion about it..
Yeah that's sad. :/
Hmm kinda reminded me of another person (Probably the same person?) who claimed that, but couldn't find him/her in the block list.
It's possible that she blocked you but doesn't realized that if 'you block someone', you are 'blocked back' by the system.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lol she told me she was blocking me, and like a coward, she hid the comment stating that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I wish I had a screencap of it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I decided to add another 'Myth' and 'Fact' on the info.
I will also copy and paste it here:
NEW: "You support bestiality because you define four legged creatures as anthropomorphic!"
K, first of all, there actually is evidence of consent after doing research as a person who questions taboos, (and apparently the other way around is real, should that guy really be considered a rapist?)
But apparently, bestiality is actually a means to a creature who is 100% NOT human. If a four legged creature happens to talk, (especially show other human characteristics), then guess what? It doesn't count as bestiality. The feel and relationship seems to lean toward a creature who's really more different than a "dumb" animal (RL non-human animals) that has the same feelings as a human or beyond. Regardless of that, if they can talk like a human, then that should obviously be accepted by consent.
It does NOT MATTER if they 'Look' like a very different shape, what matters is the consent, and that's it. Otherwise, why the fuck should you judge an 'intelligent' looking creature that crosses species? It's still just a "human" inside of another shape's body. Just like walking dogs.
AND CONSIDERING, a walking anthropomorphic has 'parts' of an animal while this is kinda the same thing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
He made actual mistakes, like big ones. He did things that were really bad I think.
What I did was use logic and information about myself and other things, argue opinions (Which is allowed), stand up for the purpose of freedom of expression, etc.
I am not a bad person for doing that.
And don't you dare compare me to that guy.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
No I'm not.
I don't get worked up over "nothing", and I'm not defending the "wrong" people.
And there is nothing wrong with being a furry. And actually they are personal insults, as mocking people for being a furry is one for example. Criticism or not, it's still tied to it, as words can be two sometimes.
Chris is a person who got really REALLY upset about arms of sonic, and did actual violence. He isn't allowed to do that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I simply said that you are both furries. I never said it was bad. Again, everything to you is an attack. Also, you do take things way too seriously.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Because you added "your a furry" in a 'bad list' of things. Like right next to things that are not only negative, but not even true.
It pretty much 'clearly' sounded like you were acting like being a furry was bad.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I never said it was bad. I simply listed similarities between you two.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
If you were a bully, you would have attacked me by now.
Me, unlike some people, accept arguements from you, and instead of screaming at you, I argue back.
(To the haters)
I am sorry guys, but I do not see anything wrong about wwwarea. All I have seen him do is argue against opinions, which is to be expected when you post one. If you can post yous, he can reply with his, I see nothing wrong with this law.
okay, I understand getting mad at him when he hoped for REM to die, but I am sure he has changed from that XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Thanks.
Sadly I guess it's hard to change from that saying about the die part, but I did said sorry for that too (Due to a possible contract with me and him I guess) and that I was extremely mad at people trying to defame me, and post other cyberbullying content. I wrote it because that one guy made an ED article about me.
He did say he's going to try to contact ED to delete it after the possible contract though.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah. The thing about "death threats" is that most of the time they are hardly provoked. Yours kinda was. Like, getting callout journals for doing nothing wrong? If someone needs a callout journal, its that kid who bitched at me for not wanting to suddenly feed my family to the wolves, but even then they obviously are fucked up in the head and that would solve nothing.
Still, its a harsh wish. Someone who bullies you may die, but then a good person who was very close to them lives might be ruined.
Lets say their father is a great doctor, but after his son died, he had to retire because he became depressed.
Anything can influence anything you know.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah I understand. Though the reason why I wanted that one person to 'die' was so he would stop doing that crap about me maybe.
Understand that too, though would you think the same if that person was a murderer and the person killed back? A close one was upset, but it did stop a spree.
Of course, it's probably too far to say it for things like that, and I would never want to promote murder to him. But the reason why of a 'dead' thing was so the person could stop doing what he/she would do to me, and maybe other people. Which is still why I said that before due to the pain that was caused against me.
I wish there is a better way, and I'm sure there is (Due to a contract thing). But I think I might try better in terms of public writing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
If they are a murderer, there is nothing that can be done then. It's best if we all avoid death to ourselves and others unless there is no other choice.
I understand that, but it still went too far. Like Justin Beiber, most people want him dead so he would stop tormenting the world. I would rather he just stop.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Unless maybe they change somehow..
I may try to avoid it, at least I might still 'want' whoever gone (Like that emotional thing), but I'll try to not say it, don't know though.
Also, they made a terrible bigoted video about me: www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6VEHt…
I have a feeling you were in it by looking at this page. But I didn't waste my time watching most or all of it.
I did flag it as bullying, slander, etc. though.
There is one misconception about you in the comments, suggesting you believe in the wrong 'normal'.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I hate it when people talk about me, and others, behind out backs before getting to know us! One glance at the damn descriptions of my "normal" stamps and they would know perfectly well that my idea of "normal" is being different. Basically, what others call "different" I call "normal".
People need to learn how to let it go. Do I make hate videos about people I disagree with? No! I mean, unless you made a journal about them first or kept block evading them, I see no reason why they needed a callout video. For all the world knows, you could be a troll. And trolls love attention.
You know, thats it. I have an idea. You will know about it in a while.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I could of swear they removed my comment replying to the person who misunderstood you. I had trouble finding it. xD Not sure if it's a glitch or someone really deleted it!
Yeah. Of course, for me, I am not a troll at all (Unless it's a minor friendly joke thing with friends if you know what I mean) if I remember. xD
Hmm interesting, alright.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I am OK if someone misunderstands me, but before they claim stuff about me they sould approach me, or else they look like a wuss who cannot stand up for what they feel is right. Not to mention an ass who likes to judge someone before they look closer at them.
Unless, that person was the immature attention seeker I met a while ago who DID judge people just by looking at them...
I can be a troll.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ah alright.
Interesting. I always think a troll just means 'Making others mad' or something like that?
Interesting idea.. though be careful what you say here in the public comment section though!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Troll is basically another word for prankster. But some trolls go too far.
Oh yes, we don't want the people to defend themselves NOT to my face now do we?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oh, I guess I need to look up troll again and such. xD
I guess, I mean if part of your plan was to hide yourself, etc. which is why I suggested hiding if you wanted to. xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
My plan involves hiding, but I am not acting out the plan just yet.
I tried to find the comment but all I found was a forum post made about me accusing me of being a SJW. Again, if he talked to me, he would not has misunderstood my hipster rant. Instead, he has unhealthy hate for some silly schoolgirl who intends no harm. Its quite interesting
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah if it's your plan, I could suggest hiding what you said here. xD
Odd, I actually went to look for your comment while reading yours just now, and apparently I can't find it anymore. I guess the person deleted it him/herself.
btw, trying to dig through this dry dirt of a video, apparently you were in it, not from here, but somewhere else. Still didn't even watch the whole video.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Probably from Animal Jam or some BS.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oh, I was talking about the comment about you on that video they made about me. xD As you said you were trying to look for the comment or something.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ugh, everyone is trying to drag me down to your hate bandwagon now. Its getting fucking annoying.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Sorry, but real morally is if anyone's will is violated. That's it. Throwing someone in jail for legally only being one, but didn't actually do a thing, is wrong. End of story.
If you think it's illegal anyway even though the certain person didn't violate any actual rape laws, then ask an online lawyer. Bye.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Pedophilia is a mental illness
they need to be send to a hospital
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
That's not a good argument, but I admit if they have one that's struggling, then they need help.
Besides, I heard from some physiologic arguments, you can't change them sadly.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I was right the whole time, you are an overly open-minded self-centered brat! Don't be kind towards pedophiles, you idiot! It's not rude when they told pedophiles should be send to the hospital. Now I can see why people despise you!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Not that I'm defending Rem, but didn't you make a death threat?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
A death threat is a means of actually threatening to kill someone.
If I said (for example) "I'm going to kill you wwwarea!", that's a death threat.
Saying "I hope wwwarea dies from a heart attack" isn't one.
I'm also against saying "I hope REM dies" because that can encourage people to kill someone, even though I did say a 'heart' thing to him, which I was thinking of and already changed. I said it like that instead of the old saying due to that one reason btw.
I suggest they do not know anything about legal definitions (Which is probably another thing they deny).
Here is a link: (This is from a legal website I think)
www.justanswer.com/law/6pb98-q…
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>