HOME | DD

SoloAD — Light Battlecruiser Victor Hugo

Published: 2012-03-04 21:18:41 +0000 UTC; Views: 26000; Favourites: 161; Downloads: 1
Redirect to original
Description Victor Hugo, France Light Battlecruiser laid down 1938

Displacement:
16 185 t light; 17 043 t standard; 18 818 t normal; 20 238 t full load

Dimensions: Length (overall / waterline) x beam x draught (normal/deep)
(639,02 ft / 617,45 ft) x 82,22 ft x (23,59 / 24,99 ft)
(194,77 m / 188,20 m) x 25,06 m x (7,19 / 7,62 m)

Armament:
4 - 12,99" / 330 mm 52,0 cal guns - 1 256,64lbs / 570,00kg shells, 80 per gun
Breech loading guns in turret on barbette mount, 1932 Model
1 x 4-gun mount on centreline, aft deck centre
16 - 5,12" / 130 mm 45,0 cal guns - 70,77lbs / 32,10kg shells, 300 per gun
Dual purpose guns in turret on barbette mounts, 1933 Model
2 x 4-gun mounts on centreline ends, evenly spread
2 raised mounts - superfiring
4 x 2-gun mounts on sides, evenly spread
16 - 1,46" / 37,0 mm 60,0 cal guns - 1,65lbs / 0,75kg shells, 3 000 per gun
Anti-air guns in deck mounts, 1933 Model
4 x 2-gun mounts on sides, forward evenly spread
4 x Single mounts on sides, aft evenly spread
4 raised mounts
40 - 0,52" / 13,2 mm 80,0 cal guns - 0,11lbs / 0,05kg shells, 10 000 per gun
Machine guns in deck mounts, 1929 Model
10 x 4-gun mounts on sides, evenly spread
4 raised mounts
2 hull mounts in casemates- Limited use in heavy seas
Weight of broadside 6 190 lbs / 2 808 kg

Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 1,57" / 40 mm 289,70 ft / 88,30 m 17,72 ft / 5,40 m
Ends: 1,57" / 40 mm 292,32 ft / 89,10 m 7,87 ft / 2,40 m
35,43 ft / 10,80 m Unarmoured ends
Main Belt covers 72% of normal length
Main belt does not fully cover magazines and engineering spaces

- Torpedo Bulkhead - Strengthened structural bulkheads:
1,18" / 30 mm 271,00 ft / 82,60 m 24,70 ft / 7,53 m
Beam between torpedo bulkheads 82,22 ft / 25,06 m

- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 7,99" / 203 mm 3,94" / 100 mm 5,91" / 150 mm
2nd: 1,00" / 25 mm 1,00" / 25 mm 3,94" / 100 mm

- Protected deck - multiple decks:
For and Aft decks: 5,71" / 145 mm

- Conning towers: Forward 7,99" / 203 mm, Aft 7,99" / 203 mm

Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines plus diesel motors,
Geared drive, 3 shafts, 96 989 shp / 72 354 Kw = 29,70 kts
Range 15 000nm at 18,00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 3 195 tons

Complement:
803 - 1 044

Cost:
£8,736 million / $34,945 million

Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 1 501 tons, 8,0%
- Guns: 1 501 tons, 8,0%
Armour: 4 437 tons, 23,6%
- Belts: 503 tons, 2,7%
- Torpedo bulkhead: 293 tons, 1,6%
- Armament: 901 tons, 4,8%
- Armour Deck: 2 496 tons, 13,3%
- Conning Towers: 244 tons, 1,3%
Machinery: 2 656 tons, 14,1%
Hull, fittings & equipment: 7 592 tons, 40,3%
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 2 633 tons, 14,0%
Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0,0%

Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
32 611 lbs / 14 792 Kg = 29,7 x 13,0 " / 330 mm shells or 4,4 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1,16
Metacentric height 4,9 ft / 1,5 m
Roll period: 15,5 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 64 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0,70
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1,27

Hull form characteristics:
Hull has low quarterdeck ,
a normal bow and a round stern
Block coefficient (normal/deep): 0,550 / 0,558
Length to Beam Ratio: 7,51 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 24,85 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 57 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 20,00 degrees
Stern overhang: 10,14 ft / 3,09 m
Freeboard (% = length of deck as a percentage of waterline length):
Fore end, Aft end
- Forecastle: 28,00%, 31,40 ft / 9,57 m, 28,31 ft / 8,63 m
- Forward deck: 32,50%, 28,31 ft / 8,63 m, 26,25 ft / 8,00 m
- Aft deck: 14,50%, 26,25 ft / 8,00 m, 26,25 ft / 8,00 m
- Quarter deck: 25,00%, 18,21 ft / 5,55 m, 19,19 ft / 5,85 m
- Average freeboard: 25,62 ft / 7,81 m

Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 76,2%
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 226,6%
Waterplane Area: 35 429 Square feet or 3 291 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 121%
Structure weight / hull surface area: 162 lbs/sq ft or 791 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0,92
- Longitudinal: 2,19
- Overall: 1,00
Excellent machinery, storage, compartmentation space
Excellent accommodation and workspace room
Good seaboat, rides out heavy weather easily

More info: solo-ad.livejournal.com/1371.h…
Related content
Comments: 32

Emilion-3 [2021-09-05 00:32:03 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JDunk1971 [2021-02-11 01:21:13 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

teslashark [2019-08-29 10:57:50 +0000 UTC]

Is it a coincidence?
warshipprojects.com/2018/03/04…

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Musashitokugawa [2016-10-29 22:49:34 +0000 UTC]

It's very good ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MarkPoe [2016-09-17 01:05:04 +0000 UTC]

Wait, you put the main armament in the rear, for a french ship.

You do realize that the joke pretty much write itself at this point...

👍: 0 ⏩: 3

teslashark In reply to MarkPoe [2019-08-29 10:55:42 +0000 UTC]

Hey, it's actually a real American proposal too.  warshipprojects.com/2018/03/04…

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

FivesTheARC9520 In reply to MarkPoe [2018-05-16 21:27:57 +0000 UTC]

Yep... this joke was destined to be here

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Chaos-Craft999 In reply to MarkPoe [2016-10-01 13:29:47 +0000 UTC]

french are a fangirl of 4 gun turrets and they always experiment with it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MarkPoe In reply to Chaos-Craft999 [2016-10-01 18:30:22 +0000 UTC]

I was referencing the old joke about the French surrendering/retreating all the time. (yes I know the joke went stale a long time ago)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Chaos-Craft999 In reply to MarkPoe [2016-10-01 22:06:42 +0000 UTC]

I am not part of france or live there but thise joke is really offensive against french people.
You should think back of what are you saying.
French has over 70 victories on its entire history.
Yes they have 50 loses but over 70 victories shouldnt be underestimated.
This was one of the most stupid stereotypes .

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

thekidthatyoudontkow In reply to Chaos-Craft999 [2018-07-13 05:33:31 +0000 UTC]

french got KICK out of indo asia lololololololololololololololol

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MarkPoe In reply to Chaos-Craft999 [2016-10-01 22:27:09 +0000 UTC]

You're taking it way too seriously, since those jokes are very common on the internet... to the point where tv tropes has an entry about it: tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php…

It's not like anyone actually takes those jokes at facevalue.

👍: 0 ⏩: 3

Chaos-Craft999 In reply to MarkPoe [2018-07-14 15:03:05 +0000 UTC]

Gotta agree with you.

Right now, i seemed to make alot of offensive jokes myself.

Damn! i'm such a hypocrite!

I feel like i wanna kill my self from 2 years ago

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Musashitokugawa In reply to MarkPoe [2016-10-29 22:40:43 +0000 UTC]

I don't take it too seriously, even if i'm French.

But ....

during the First world war, over 1 400 00 french soldiers died ... Those who think that french are loosers should remember that.
That's why i didn't buyed Battlefield 1 which never talk about the French Army's sacrifice (and russian's army too) and disdained the real historicals facts.

And Chaos-Craft is right. The stereotypes are stupid. And I don't give any attention to them ^^ .

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ACBradley In reply to Musashitokugawa [2017-01-23 20:22:59 +0000 UTC]

They're adding the French in with the first expansion, they were probably trying to figure out a way to make it fair since French soldiers had that bright blue uniform.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Chaos-Craft999 In reply to MarkPoe [2016-10-02 11:41:20 +0000 UTC]

Its still an insult if you were a french.
Its fine to read a jokes about them but its offensive if it keeps getting bigger and wont stop.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Dilandu [2016-01-16 15:20:50 +0000 UTC]

Very good!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SoloAD In reply to Dilandu [2016-01-19 16:19:37 +0000 UTC]

Спасибо!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

James-Polymer [2015-04-05 05:20:01 +0000 UTC]

The French Dunkerque-class battlecruisers adopted an armament layout in a similar vein, with 8 guns concentrated in 2 forward turrets. To prevent a single hit from taking out half of their firepower, each turret was divided down the middle by an armored bulkhead.  

Ok, nerd rant over; this piece is phenomenal! Have you considered selling your work to publishers that focus on military equipment like Osprey?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SoloAD In reply to James-Polymer [2015-04-05 08:28:07 +0000 UTC]

Thanks. No, I don't try to sell my works.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Anzac-A1 [2015-03-16 04:29:10 +0000 UTC]

You used SpringSharp I see.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Chaos-Craft999 In reply to Anzac-A1 [2016-10-01 13:29:04 +0000 UTC]

agree with that

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

quacky112 [2015-01-11 20:45:56 +0000 UTC]

This is really awesome, is this a 3d model?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SoloAD In reply to quacky112 [2015-01-12 03:43:49 +0000 UTC]

No, it's 2D

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

wingsofwrath [2014-03-15 18:00:12 +0000 UTC]

I'd like to commend you on your skill as both an artist and as a naval designer, this ship really looks like it could have existed.

Sure, putting the main armament all in a single turret to the aft of the ship is a rather novel idea, but it would make sense for a "pocket battlecruiser" - she can probably subdue anything smaller with her secondary battery alone and she'd be running away from anything heavier anyway, so that's exactly where you need her guns.

Besides, it's not like the French "Jeune Ecole" of shipbuilding haven't tried even more far fetched ideas in real life...

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

ACBradley In reply to wingsofwrath [2017-01-23 20:26:10 +0000 UTC]

Not that novel, actually, HMS Furious did the same thing with one 18-inch gun pointing to the rear when they got rid of the front gun to add a wee carrier deck.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SoloAD In reply to wingsofwrath [2014-03-16 08:18:34 +0000 UTC]

Thanks. I started work on a new ship. I plan to finish in two weeks. I hope this ship you like it too.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NenadGojkovic [2013-04-23 11:53:12 +0000 UTC]

Very nice work, very detailed, love it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ShrikeArghast [2013-01-22 19:46:55 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I can't imagine anyone would build a foredeck hybrid like this, although it's a neat idea. Warship planners -- particularly the French -- always favored a 'guns forward' approach because there was a strong sentiment that ships should never be running away from intended targets. Plus, if WWI experience was any indication, putting all the 13" guns into a single turret would be a good way to end up with a toothless fighting vessel pretty quick. All the eggs in one basket, so to speak.

Still, the quality of your work is superb. Have you given any consideration to doing a few WWI German designs? IMO, they had the prettiest ships of the era.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SoloAD In reply to ShrikeArghast [2013-01-23 18:56:35 +0000 UTC]

I more like WWII era ships

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ArmamentDawg [2012-10-30 06:03:45 +0000 UTC]

Is this an original design, or did the French actually draft blueprints of this? (Putting the main guns in the REAR of the ship, confirms many stereotypes the Americans have of the French.)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SoloAD In reply to ArmamentDawg [2012-10-31 16:59:52 +0000 UTC]

It's original design.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0