HOME | DD
StamatisGR — Hyperfocal technique tutorial
Published: 2009-02-18 11:10:08 +0000 UTC; Views: 8275; Favourites: 118; Downloads: 291
Redirect to original
Description
Dedicated to all the yardies and whoever else may find it useful
THE HYPERFOCAL DISTANCE CALCULATOR :
For Nikon users: [link]
For all other brand users, including Nikon: [link]
______________________________________________________________
Thank you for your time to look at my picture, your kindness to comment on it
and your generosity to fav it. Your support is greatly appreciated.
Related content
Comments: 144
exactly! the light is a most crucial factor
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Canon?? what's that? a car brand maybe?
Added!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
my pleasure dear friend
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Thankyou SO MUCH!!!
Do you mind if I print a few copies of this & take to my next camera club meeting?
I'm sure there will quite a few of us who would find this information very useful!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
all my works are free to use
you're very welcome.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Awesome! haven't heard of this before but this will be extremely useful for secretly taking pictures ...street pictures... 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
it's also very useful for landscapes, when you want everything in focus
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yes you're right, but for landscapes you can still use a tripod
so it's a lil' different
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
especially in landscapes with a tripod you can, shut the aperture down to f.22 or f.32 or even smaller and enjoy a hell of a depth of field. Everything from your nose to infinity will be in focus
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
well thats photography basics...
But very good u posted it.I know photographers that dont even know about this...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
don't judge from yourself
a lot asked me...
so..m'ena smparo polla trygonia!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yes,i can imagine...
its also very good for the hipshot thechnique
and for nightshoots when u use flash and u cannot focus due to the low lighting conditions
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
and for landscapes too!
I'm almost ignorant about the use of flash
I wouldn't mind if my camera hadn't one
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
i hate flash!I only use it for indoor photgraphy or parties
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
exactly!!!
especially now with the high ISOs
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Put the useful link in the artist's comments, silly!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
foda-se you lazy guy! you're right!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
[link]
A lot of info here as well. It appears 5.6 is an all around way to go.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
fantastic resource!
how can one not love the internet for so many free information? Never stops to amaze me!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It is amazing! It has all my lenses.
Again, for my Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS, 5.6.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Amazing would be if it had all the future lenses that have not been produced yet!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Awesome, Stam!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Not the brightest!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yep! sharpest!
yeah, I wish, my brightest is 2.8
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I still can't find the sharpest aperture for my lenses
50mm prime
100mm
18-55mm.
In one of my books it says that it's usually 2 steps bellow maximum aperture.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
For my canon 50mm: [link]
at wide-open aperture the resolution is already very good and even across the frame. Stopping down lifts the quality to excellent levels peaking around f/5.6.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
quite interesting!
I'll be checking my Nikkor AF 28mm f/2.8D.
Though I trust my eyes better, because no lens in the product line is the same. There are major differences in quality even among exactly the same brand lenses. These differences are supposed to be of less significance in major brands (canon, nikon, etc.) and quite irritating at other brands (sigma, tamron, tokina etc.). So it's also a matter of luck, not to mention the price difference
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Thank you Stamatis. This is very useful.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
my pleasure Malcolm!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Thanks alot for this, I haven't read a lot about this before, this will be helpful, after I get my head around it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I hope I made it simple enough
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
<= Prev |