HOME | DD

wwwarea β€” If They Consent, Then There is Nothing Wrong

#anthro #consent #furry #human #pairing #anthropomoprhic
Published: 2015-02-13 01:48:02 +0000 UTC; Views: 3317; Favourites: 73; Downloads: 7
Redirect to original
Description

UPDATE
What is an anthro?
Some people think that it's also morphism shapes only, but it can also include less morphism shapes, but more animal shape, but them doing human characteristics.
Anthro/Anthropomorphism can have different styles apparently and I find nothing wrong with any shape with human like talking.
I got four favorites on here before this update was added.. Like I'm saying that in case some people who favorite this thought anthro only means morphism shapes. lol
UPDATE DONE



Seriously. Like I remember going to a video that talked about 'relationships' being "wrong" and of course, it's some bigot (I wonder if it's just a joke video?) who attacked stuff just because it's different. Well, I think in some, it's like "how, past actions, etc" idk and forgiveness is important, but on that Sonic 06 thing he mentioned (Don't even know it that much), he just calls this one wrong.. why? Because it's a human and a non-human anthro (That can possibly consent too).
I even defended it, stating what I think, even in a calm way, and some stupid Diddy Kong fan goes in and calls me a "sick fuck".

Or maybe it's because the person was too young? idk. Never played Sonic 06 or know that much about it.

But I really hate people who discriminate people for being happy with each other (2, or more, yes more too, lol)



And no, an anthropomorphic (Even if they looked like animals but talks) isn't the same as an actual non-human animal on this planet (Which can be considered bestiality).
Though despite the fact that I heard even non-human animals can consent here, I still don't want people comparing TALKING creatures to it.
And no, I don't think I'm into animals on this planet, but I do like anthropomorphic maybe. hahaha

Anyway, I don't know if FurryxHuman stuff is taboo or not, but either way:
If people are consenting and being happy, then it's none of our business for sure.

GET IT? GOOD.

And if you are against this kind of stuff, then you are violating the Golden Rule.
I fucking hate prejudice, bigotry, ignorance, hypocrisy, and probably other problems.







One thing I'm worried about is that if we were in a time that furries came form some world (Isn't it possible in terms of aliens, multiverse, etc?) and they started to marry each other, there could be prejudice discrimination..
If so, then I guess we DIDN'T LEARN one thing from Gay rights or whatever: Consenting.
I mean consenting as the excuse would naturally mean legalizing other things that are probably still taboo.
If we go like, well, "we still can't", then it's hypocritical or whatever, or more.

Like why do people have a hate system against things... different? I don't fucking have this anymore, because I found my self, and respect others as I respect my self in my own personal freedom.








___________________________________________________

Stamp Template - kencho.deviantart.com/art/Stam…
I have a feeling I forgot which template it was. Oh well, I didn't make the template part for sure.

Related content
Comments: 54

JohnSpartan1982 In reply to ??? [2017-02-13 20:22:56 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Commenter

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ilovewheatley In reply to JohnSpartan1982 [2017-02-16 16:49:38 +0000 UTC]

Fuckin I dunno, I'm not a scientist, you don't need to try and justify your desire to fuck a minx to a stranger online

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JohnSpartan1982 In reply to ilovewheatley [2017-11-03 09:47:20 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Commenter

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ilovewheatley In reply to JohnSpartan1982 [2017-11-10 21:04:21 +0000 UTC]

how do i feel in colonial times? nothing, i wasnt there lol

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

wwwarea In reply to ??? [2015-07-27 06:58:10 +0000 UTC]

Maybe. Though then it could of just considered considered something else. (Maybe cross species?)

Maybe, but I also heard (When trying to find this article) that non-human animals can in fact do it for pleasure purposes rather than reproduction purposes.
Though sometimes the term "unnatural" is accepted by some homosexuality defenders (maybe) but defends that and compare it to the fact that we (or most) often use unnatural things all the time. Like computers.
Hmm perhaps maybe it's all depending on intelligence. Example: A human having some kind of sexual relationship with a 'part' of someone's body other than the common may not be natural, but it's a reflection off of our intelligence to enjoy sex in many different ways even though I think sex was naturally maybe designed for the boring stuff (reproduction) haha. Still I wouldn't consider it a problem because I think 'Any body should have a right to enjoy, with consent or alone by the owner's consent.'
-----
Glad you are open to hear. xD And hmm, perhaps that could be true about non-human animals but I can't 100% accept it as how it works, but I do think 'reason' shouldn't be a moral argument just to be safe maybe. (Unless it's certain reasons with consent, not too sure).
I also heard about pedo being an illness, but at the same time, I am not sure if that's biases (I don't support abusing children, just a wonder).

Sadly the WordPress was deleted by unknown reasons. But an archive does exist. Hopefully I will find it again.
Oh here it is! archive.is/pp3m
I sadly wish the site didn't closed down because I thought it was very good. I wonder how it happened? It also turns out that this guy may consider bestiality similar to how you view it. xD
Here is another page , it's another list, but I think that's all of them here. There is also another page (The biggest post ever from that site) that's been archive but it's not found here. You can ask if you want.

Ah I see I think. Would you consider the ponies from MLP anthro?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

RY0ASUKA [2015-07-09 03:50:01 +0000 UTC]

oh this stamp is lovely! I love anthroxhuman ships!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JohnSpartan1982 In reply to RY0ASUKA [2017-03-22 00:00:38 +0000 UTC]

Interspecies you mean

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RY0ASUKA In reply to JohnSpartan1982 [2017-03-22 00:05:41 +0000 UTC]

old comment dude, no real point in correcting it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SonicGMI-22 In reply to ??? [2015-03-14 12:00:00 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Owner

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

wwwarea In reply to SonicGMI-22 [2015-03-25 02:55:45 +0000 UTC]

You have no respect towards Freedom of Speech, or Consensual Freedom.
Please stay away from our world. Thank You.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DJ-Aftershock In reply to SonicGMI-22 [2015-03-21 22:20:34 +0000 UTC]

//mature deviantart post

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0


<= Prev |