HOME | DD
wwwarea β If They Consent, Then There is Nothing Wrong
#anthro #consent #furry #human #pairing #anthropomoprhic
Published: 2015-02-13 01:48:02 +0000 UTC; Views: 3317; Favourites: 73; Downloads: 7
Redirect to original
Description
UPDATE
What is an anthro?
Some people think that it's also morphism shapes only, but it can also include less morphism shapes, but more animal shape, but them doing human characteristics.
Anthro/Anthropomorphism can have different styles apparently and I find nothing wrong with any shape with human like talking.
I got four favorites on here before this update was added.. Like I'm saying that in case some people who favorite this thought anthro only means morphism shapes. lol
UPDATE DONE
Seriously. Like I remember going to a video that talked about 'relationships' being "wrong" and of course, it's some bigot (I wonder if it's just a joke video?) who attacked stuff just because it's different. Well, I think in some, it's like "how, past actions, etc" idk and forgiveness is important, but on that Sonic 06 thing he mentioned (Don't even know it that much), he just calls this one wrong.. why? Because it's a human and a non-human anthro (That can possibly consent too).
I even defended it, stating what I think, even in a calm way, and some stupid Diddy Kong fan goes in and calls me a "sick fuck".
Or maybe it's because the person was too young? idk. Never played Sonic 06 or know that much about it.
But I really hate people who discriminate people for being happy with each other (2, or more, yes more too, lol)
And no, an anthropomorphic (Even if they looked like animals but talks) isn't the same as an actual non-human animal on this planet (Which can be considered bestiality).
Though despite the fact that I heard even non-human animals can consent here, I still don't want people comparing TALKING creatures to it.
And no, I don't think I'm into animals on this planet, but I do like anthropomorphic maybe. hahaha
Anyway, I don't know if FurryxHuman stuff is taboo or not, but either way:
If people are consenting and being happy, then it's none of our business for sure.
GET IT? GOOD.
And if you are against this kind of stuff, then you are violating the Golden Rule.
I fucking hate prejudice, bigotry, ignorance, hypocrisy, and probably other problems.
One thing I'm worried about is that if we were in a time that furries came form some world (Isn't it possible in terms of aliens, multiverse, etc?) and they started to marry each other, there could be prejudice discrimination..
If so, then I guess we DIDN'T LEARN one thing from Gay rights or whatever: Consenting.
I mean consenting as the excuse would naturally mean legalizing other things that are probably still taboo.
If we go like, well, "we still can't", then it's hypocritical or whatever, or more.
Like why do people have a hate system against things... different? I don't fucking have this anymore, because I found my self, and respect others as I respect my self in my own personal freedom.
___________________________________________________
Stamp Template - kencho.deviantart.com/art/Stamβ¦
I have a feeling I forgot which template it was. Oh well, I didn't make the template part for sure.
Related content
Comments: 54
π: 0 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 0
As long as there is a capacity to give consent from both sides, I don't see what the problem is.
π: 2 β©: 0
Don't you think you're getting a little dramatic over fictional media? Anthropomorphic characters don't exist. Don't be JustinRPG.
π: 0 β©: 1
I hate human attraction, some anthropomorphic creatures are preferable and I need to personally take it somewhat seriously at least to be happy with it.
Also... JustinRPG having personal attraction to PokΓ©mon isn't wrong. It's his life, it's not effecting anyone, don't dictate others of that...
π: 0 β©: 1
Out of morbid curiosity, what βanthropomorphic creaturesβ are you into, so much so that you would be more attracted to them than people?
π: 0 β©: 1
It's exactly what you might be guessing. Four legged anthropomorphic wolves and probably some PokΓ©mon.
π: 0 β©: 1
So you want to bone the wolves from Alpha and Omega?
π: 0 β©: 0
No, rape in this example is wrong. Just because another is "an animal" doesn't make it wrong. Behavior from you is partly why I'm a misanthropic.
π: 1 β©: 0
I do support interspecies romance in comics, shows, games and all that
π: 0 β©: 0
Because you find it gross?
π: 0 β©: 0
Beware the fun police!!
The only reason people have "issues" now is because we live in a world of big babies and all this pseudo-religious morality bullshit of today's watered down world. Everyone is triggered by some stupid shit and then we have idiots planning on absolutely retarded shit like banning boobs in video games. People have these obnoxious attitudes of, "I art holier than thou!" and I can't fucking stand it. Ya know, 20 years ago in the 90's people put large breasted furries in cartoons like the Animaniacs and Tiny Toons and there wasn't fucking morons debating "are furries moral?" Why? Because it doesn't fucking matter! IT'S A GODAMN CARTON! FICTION! Aka, not real. And you know what else I find funny? You think in today's retard progressive world with people who say shit like, "I identify as a bisexual asexual multi-sexual gender queer sea bass who identifies as a woman" that people putting pictures on the internet of cat girls with big boobs wouldn't matter. But apparently it does! I guess all these progressive morons won't dare attack something if it's queer cuz that would be hateful! But if you're trying to have fun (and especially if it doesn't matter) THEN YOU MUST BE SILENCED!! It shows you how fucking privileged and bored people are today if they are willing to spend hours debating on whether or not we should have big titty fox ladies in media, and not, I dunno, fucking ISIS!.
This is why I hate, HATE today's modern world. I'm tired of all this thin-skinned dickheads who get so offended by stupid bullshit that doesn't fucking matter. Christ, why is the hours upon hours of debate on furries? Who the fuck cares.
Dear SJW and other morons: Stop trying to police media (fiction that is not real) and focus on real issues. Like how about in the Congo, women are sold as property? You know I would call that straight up fucked up! Oh I guess that probably doesn't trigger you so it's not a problem that affects you personally.
Yeah fuck off.
Yours truly, everyone who wants you to STFU.
π: 0 β©: 3
π: 0 β©: 0
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 2
i know right? Lol like no one can voice an opinion.
π: 0 β©: 1
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
haha I'm with you, man. Lol "beware fun police". it's funny when people get mad. And the "thin-skinned dickheads" part. He's the one who thin-skinned. Lol it's like calm down.
π: 0 β©: 0
How about learning not to get your jimmies rustled over the most irrelevant shit. Seriously this, "morality about furries" bullshit has got to be one of the dumbest non-issues I have seen on the internet. Again no one cared 20 years ago, but hey in today's trigger warning world why not.
SPOILERS: FICTION ISN'T REAL.
Stop being a self-righteous asshole who has to prove he is so much holier than the everyone else.
π: 0 β©: 1
man, you're a crybaby
π: 0 β©: 0
lol calm down
π: 0 β©: 1
Hey I'm just venting at people being stupid that's all.
π: 0 β©: 1
lol. Get over it. I hate these pairings too. What you gonna do now? : p
π: 0 β©: 1
Obviously cry myself to sleep.
Not I really don't give a shit. You do what you like. It's one thing to not like something and do your thing, and it's another thing to act as the fun police. I'm just tired of people bitching over the stupidest, irrelevant shit out there. This furry morality shit is fucking stupid because who the fuck cares, this is all fiction so there is no need to police fantasy.
My main point is that people have become increasingly concerned over the unimportant and thus whine it non-stop and argue about banning things like boobs and butts in video games. I want them to do the opposite. OK that would be cool.
π: 0 β©: 0
The hate is strong in this one... yes...
π: 0 β©: 0
Or give 'behavior' (e.g. Sign language) like you said maybe on another thing somewhere.
π: 0 β©: 0
Then anthro pony x human action is no wrong?
π: 0 β©: 1
Nope only if the pony is a humanoid anthro being with breasts, legs, arms, hands and all of a human plus same genitals like a human and similar DNA then it's ok to romance an anthro pony.
See Bojack whom he is an anthro humanoid horse person who dated ladies of all species even human ladies.
π: 0 β©: 1
*sigh*
They don't need to look like that in order for it to be OK.
If you have a problem with a four-legged pony being happy with a human, then get help.
π: 0 β©: 1
Ok a four legged pony then for someone being happy with a human
π: 0 β©: 0
The main reason bestiality is bad is because the animal can't consent, but most anthros can talk and have similar minds to humans, meaning they can consent and so it's okay.
π: 0 β©: 0
Anthro and human pairing in a cartoon or games is only fiction. It's no biggie
π: 0 β©: 1
What about in comics?
π: 0 β©: 1
Ah yes. In fictional comics too
π: 0 β©: 1
What about Regular Show, Beauty and the Beast (the 80's TV show with Ron Perlman and Sarah Conner herself Linda Hamilton) with Catherine and Vincent where Vincent is a humanoid lion-likeΒ man of extremely large build with the facial characteristics of aΒ lionΒ (fanged teeth, a flattened nose and a cleft upper lip) and fingers tipped with claw-like nails. He is also much stronger than ordinary humans and, when enraged, growls and roars like a lion plus born that way, Vastra and Jenny on Doctor Who, Star Trek, Star Wars etc. other examples of interspecies romance
π: 0 β©: 1
Sure, let people ship who they want
π: 0 β©: 0
I'm not sure if it bestiality of not to be honest. Bestiality isn't just human/animal, its any species mating with someone of a different species, this can be any species. If an anthro is an animal with more human qualities, they are still technically of different species, so it does count as bestiality. However most peoples issue with bestiality is its 1. unnatural but mostly 2. the animals don't have the same brain capacity and therefore cannot consent, so its rape. Therefore an anthro wouldn't have that, since it has the same brain capacity as a human being, and could give voiced consent, so its hardly exactly the same as bestiality.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
Maybe 'some 'bestiality'' is not bad then, considering even a different brain can still be similar to humans of consent (Like enough). Even Humans don't have pure free-will either maybe. And since we are just animals too. However, are you sure it can mean to 'any species'? I always hear it's only involving humans, and never heard (maybe) that it can involve any cross-species.
Example: If there is an animal that talks like a human, and can show like similar human rights parades (for example), I could say it's enough. xD
Some say that 'bestiality' means no-consent, but does that mean a whole different species mean that? Some 'whole different' species could have very intelligent brains very similar to humans. Example: "Reptile people" from another planet are 'different species', but they are intelligent too. There is also the idea of behavior too.
Personality, I think "bestiality" should just apply to a pure non-anthropomoprhic animal too. Considering I think there are some people who really are attractive to imaginary talking creatures who stand on four legs. I also heard from research (And as a person who questions taboos) that non-human animals can sometimes give consent via behavior, and cases that it's the 'other way around' clearly proving consensual if you know what I'm talking about.
I also heard that actual zoophilias are being accepted as an orientation by some physiologically people.
Yeah I know, I kinda went far there, I was currently suffering from a slanderous, etc. video made about me involving anthropomorphic creatures. Well it was part of the video too.
π: 0 β©: 1
Bestiality isn't seen as an issue when its different species not involving humans, I mean we've forcibly bred tigers and lions together, though they had offspring it was very ill and couldn't reproduce. Bestiality does technically just mean two animals of different species mating though.
I do actually agree some animals in real life have shown sexual consent, at least as best they can, which is why its a bit odd and a difficult topic. From what I've seen, people allow technical bestiality if the two are sexually compatible, intelligent and can give consent, I mean you have things like Planet of the Apes, Ponyo, Wolf Children ext, or even werewolf movies, because they're not technically human they're animals, but they're sexually compatible and humanly intelligent.Β
I think this is just because the issue with bestiality is it is technically unnatural. Two different species cannot reproduce and there's no real explanation as to why they would be attracted to each other, plus to my knowledge no animals have ever been documented committing bestiality, humans are the only ones that have done it, aside from maybe dogs and dolphins but that's because they mistake humans for their own species.Β
But that suggests that anthro's are therefore not bestiality, or not like real life bestiality. In most depictions, anthro's can have sex with humans and reproduce healthy children, which suggests that DNA wise they're close enough to be of almost the same species, so its not bestiality, and therefore not an issue.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
I just remember hearing that bestiality has to involve a human and a non-human maybe. Like I think the term may have been more special rather than something general like 'cannibalism' which applies to any species. xD Then again, I may need to research more of this to make sure.
Here: www.merriam-webster.com/dictioβ¦
I see, but I do not think people should find it "wrong" because of that. Homosexuals cannot reproduce either, but are fine because they are fighting for rights to enjoy each other. A lot of sexual acts involving humans are not reproducing either, but a lot of people don't care. Because it's two (or more...) people enjoying each other and I think that's all that matters. Naturally I do not know if it's really "unnatural", it could be argued that it is and since I might of heard that 'zoosexual' was started to be accepted by some physiology people as some orientation and considering, a lot of so-called "unnatural" things has created other life things and since the term "unnatural" is an opinion. I heard 'reverse' happens', and seen a picture of a lion and another one (From some article about the subject). It could be mistaken, but that is still documentary of proof of crosses.
But in the end, morally I think 'consent' of living creatures should be the only thing that matters, and I still believe that 'other species' can still count as anthro too since to me I think 'different' species isn't always 'no reproduction' and it's possible that in the anthropomorphic fantasy world involving (like what you said) can somehow have reproduction too since it's fantasy. xD But I still do not think we should base our "morals" off of that.
I also believe that 'bestiality' should count to pure non-human animals on this earth at least. Still, like being more safe around subjects. I don't know for sure..
It kinda sounds like you are open. I might be open to send a link about the arguments of this one subject, but you probably don't want it, so I don't know.
Edit: Sorry, I'm actually not sure when you say 'anthro', you are including four legged creatures, but can talk and stuff (Anthropomorphic) or not.
π: 0 β©: 1
That's interesting, honestly I've always considered it between two animals of different species, the issue is a lot of people consider humans to not be animals, which isn't true, we're a species same as every other species, we're not even the most advanced, I mean orca's have much higher brain capacity and emotional capacity than humans, they feel emotions we can't even imagine.
Well, homosexuality is interesting because it does have a place in nature, same with asexuality. A lot of people say its unnatural because animals are meant to breed, but there's a lot of evidence it exists to stop overpopulating. In area's where overpopulation has occurred, more gay offspring are born, and some animals release a hormone that takes away sexual desire entirely, which is also proof asexuality is a biological thing. Homosexual animals can't breed, no, but there is a reason now known for why it happens.
To be honest I haven't seen much about bestiality, at least scientifically, I'd like too though, it interests me why it happens. I mean psychologists have proven things like pedophilia stems from mental illness, and there's no proof otherwise, but zoophilia... I'm not sure about that one, I really would like to know why it happens. I don't think it stems entirely from mental illness, but I'm not sure what it stems from. Maybe its when an animal cannot locate a partner of the immediate same species they will settle with one that shares some similar traits? That would explain lions/tigers and horses/donkeys mating.
I'd love to see it sure, I'm a training psychologist so this topic really does interest me.Β
Anthro to me is an animal with human traits, so that would include four legged animals.Β
π: 0 β©: 2
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
If its not human its still like, bestiality lmao, thats the rule, unless they're close enough biologically to make babies like, say, a dog and a dingo, it counts lol
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>