HOME | DD

parallellogic — Groups: Correspondence Items

Published: 2009-08-26 09:08:09 +0000 UTC; Views: 19330; Favourites: 143; Downloads: 147
Redirect to original
Description Next

This is an inside look at how groups function, mostly to answer questions by users who don't know what features will be included or how they will function.

-.- There are probably some pretty gruesome typos in here, I haven't proof-read this just yet, please feel free to point out any you see.

I implore you to ask questions, the more you ask, the more detailed and the more useful I can make this

FAQ:
>> The number of users who can participate in a group (submit art, blogs, favs, etc) is unlimited, even for unsubscribed groups. You do not have to join the group (become a groupie) in order to participate. There is currently a limit of 100 groupies for any unsubscribed group.
>> Correspondence Items, when closed, are removed from the group message center. The system tries to reduce clutter, thus the messages can be seen in the group log if needed for reference purposes
>> Only 2 groups appear in the collections drop down at this time
>> Tips and tricks for changing the search results while searching for artwork to submit to a group can be found here: [link] , "gallery:username" for normal stuff and "gallery:username/*" for everything including scraps =Pyritie
>> There is nowhere where you can currently get a group during this alpha testing phase, you have to be hand chosen by an admin to receive one

Questions and Comments greatly encouraged
Related content
Comments: 239

trubieforever In reply to ??? [2013-01-18 03:36:43 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for answering, I have been wondering that for awhile!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ibella777 In reply to ??? [2012-01-09 06:29:37 +0000 UTC]

okay thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ibella777 [2011-11-15 00:45:21 +0000 UTC]

is you joined a group that is in approval stage,how long will it take?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

parallellogic In reply to ibella777 [2011-11-15 03:24:00 +0000 UTC]

If you get a Correspondence Item and it says it's in the approval stage, then that means the group has set up membership applications to only be accepted once the group approves them. Groups approve membership applications by vote, but that may be one vote or five... it varies from group to group (most groups have automatic acceptance for membership applications, so you're normally a member of the group the moment you apply). The admins in the group need to vote for your membership to be approved or denied. If not enough mods in the group vote, then your membership request will eventually expire without being decided one way or another. The maximum time that a membership request can go unanswered is one month. Thus within one month you will know whether your membership request was approved, denied or was not finalized and thus expired. Other than that, it just depends on the group. The group may list on their blogs how long it will take, but that's fairly uncommon.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ibella777 In reply to parallellogic [2011-11-15 05:30:40 +0000 UTC]

Oh okay I get it now and thanks for the info ;D

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Baby-Suzu In reply to ??? [2010-11-26 00:28:19 +0000 UTC]

These tutorials of yours are pretty helpful.

I am not sure if you want us to ask questions in the comments or not, but...
Are the 'sub-folders' only for the super groups (paying groups)?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

parallellogic In reply to Baby-Suzu [2010-11-26 02:53:53 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

To the best of my knowledge, that is correct. I don't own any subbed groups, and I don't see a way to add sub folders in the groups I'm in that are subbed (where I'm a lower admin and likely don't have those privs)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Baby-Suzu In reply to parallellogic [2010-11-26 14:28:59 +0000 UTC]

I see. Thank you anyway!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

OmriKoresh In reply to ??? [2010-07-07 15:40:48 +0000 UTC]

the text is So hard to read...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

parallellogic In reply to OmriKoresh [2010-07-07 18:37:58 +0000 UTC]

But I was using the exact same font the rest of the site users.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

OmriKoresh In reply to parallellogic [2010-07-07 19:19:17 +0000 UTC]

maybe it's my screen but i doubt it because it's HD.
donno' can't read it very well..

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

parallellogic In reply to OmriKoresh [2010-07-07 19:30:17 +0000 UTC]

Have you tried Downloading the image? You may be getting some kind of artifacting if the image isn't full-viewing correctly.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

OmriKoresh In reply to parallellogic [2010-07-07 19:36:20 +0000 UTC]

oh, silly me.
yes, it was that!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

parallellogic In reply to OmriKoresh [2010-07-07 19:38:40 +0000 UTC]

Ah, glad to hear that fixed it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

strich9ine In reply to ??? [2010-04-07 10:49:48 +0000 UTC]

Is there a german version of this excellent walkthrough?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

parallellogic In reply to strich9ine [2010-04-07 22:18:51 +0000 UTC]

Not that I'm aware of, no. If you find on/make one, please let me know so that I may link to it, thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

strich9ine In reply to parallellogic [2010-04-13 17:12:41 +0000 UTC]

Ok.
I think about it and contact you if something changes.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

winter-ame In reply to ??? [2009-12-21 21:39:41 +0000 UTC]

So I've been trying to work with my group, and I can't enable some features. I am trying to allow people to join my group, but when someone tries to join they only have the option to join as a co-founder or contributor. How would I be able to allow people to join as a member? Also, how to I allow all my members to submit artwork to the group?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

parallellogic In reply to winter-ame [2009-12-21 21:47:24 +0000 UTC]

I believe you're looking for the Back Room "Manage Members" area [link] , you should be able to fix the priv settings from there

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

winter-ame In reply to parallellogic [2009-12-21 21:59:28 +0000 UTC]

K Thanks a bunch. I couldn't find it. XD now it works right. :]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

XMarleauxX [2009-12-08 09:57:35 +0000 UTC]

You seem to be in charge of groups
I had a DA for my dolling magazine but I didn't know I could turn it into a group. Actually I don't know if I could, it wasn't an actual club. So I created an actual group I've got the group set up perfectly but everyone's links are set to . Also, all the magazine's watchers are on there. Is there a way to merge to 2, or rather overwrite with but keep the watchers. Ya know? If this isn't the right place to ask, can you direct me? ^_^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

parallellogic In reply to XMarleauxX [2009-12-08 19:14:23 +0000 UTC]

~You seem to be in charge of groups
Well, knowledgeable about, not really in charge of, I'm part of the debugging team on #devBUG

There is no way to merge accounts at this time, the two accounts are distinct entities. Personally, I would suggest letting the #PxT-Magazine account go inactive and convert the ~PxTMagazine when you have the opportunity. In any case, that would allow you to keep the watchers and submissions from the club when you begin using the groups systems. I believe the development staff will eventually look into designing a deactivation function for group accounts much like for personal accounts at which time I would suggest you deactivate the #PxT-Magazine account to avoid confusion. Until then, I would suggest upgrading the club to a group and maintaining the group's operations through the same account as before

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

XMarleauxX In reply to parallellogic [2009-12-08 20:23:44 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

parallellogic In reply to XMarleauxX [2009-12-08 20:44:33 +0000 UTC]

Certainly

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

xRUBIx In reply to ??? [2009-12-05 17:09:52 +0000 UTC]

hi =]
this has helped me alot =]

how do you change the groups avatar?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

parallellogic In reply to xRUBIx [2009-12-05 23:39:27 +0000 UTC]

Well, you can change in much the same way as you can change your own avatar: if you scroll over the avatar while viewing the profile page, an editing option will appear which when clicked, will allow you to change the image

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xRUBIx In reply to parallellogic [2009-12-05 23:41:45 +0000 UTC]

XD i figured it out about two minutes ater i asked, i didnt realise it at first because normally i go through 'edit settings' to change my avi.

thank you anyway =]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Seiorai In reply to ??? [2009-12-01 15:46:25 +0000 UTC]

Could you tell me please how to add the Groups section at the top of the userpage?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

parallellogic In reply to Seiorai [2009-12-01 20:10:39 +0000 UTC]

It appears there automatically if you administrate for a group; it only shows the groups for which you are an admin for, not the ones where you are a member

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Seiorai In reply to parallellogic [2009-12-01 20:14:08 +0000 UTC]

Ooh, I see
Thank you for explaining

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

parallellogic In reply to Seiorai [2009-12-01 20:21:39 +0000 UTC]

Certainly

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Vypor [2009-10-31 06:18:20 +0000 UTC]

I'm still trying to understand what this group thing is. As I have a club I'd like to convert. But I need to figure out how and what it is.

I've no idea how they're run, lol.
There's so much info about them that you can't gain any.
Pardon the intentional oxi-moron.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

parallellogic In reply to Vypor [2009-10-31 07:15:54 +0000 UTC]

Well, if you're curious about groups, you can tell me what you know and I can help fill in the gaps if you would like

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Vypor In reply to parallellogic [2009-10-31 13:23:21 +0000 UTC]


I dunno, I jsut woke up and all the info has run together in a big sticky memory-mess in my head.
I'll see if I can sort it out for an actual question. lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheMangaPit In reply to ??? [2009-10-26 20:42:07 +0000 UTC]

I know you had mentioned of a application process for starting a group. Do we have to create a separate account to start this group, and who do we submit the application to in order to start a group.

I just started a poll not too long ago asking my watchers if they'd want me to start a Collaboration Group, but appearently I'm fairly new to creating groups or clubs.

All gallery posts who be revolved around art collaborations in which I'd be participating with other DeviantArts or art collaborations in my local community. My group would be based somewhat like what one of DeviantArt's gallery moderator's is trying to do (can't think of the account name at the moment). Before I could tell my watchers any further news I need to figure out all the details myself. Any kind of information regarding this subject would be very much appriciated, thanks .

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

parallellogic In reply to TheMangaPit [2009-10-26 23:50:25 +0000 UTC]

~Do we have to create a separate account to start this group
To the best of my knowledge, you do not need to create a new account in order to apply for a group. There are two application processes: one for clubs that have existed for some time and wish to be converted from normal accounts into group accounts, and the other process is for groups to be created from scratch (there was no account, and then suddenly there is a group account, no club account in-between).

~and who do we submit the application to in order to start a group.
There will be a "super group" that the site admins will moderate and accept group applications through.

~I just started a poll not too long ago asking my watchers if they'd want me to start a Collaboration Group
I would suggest looking at [link] for some good group/club starting tips. I've been thinking for some time now about making a "good practices" tutorial for clubs (and now groups) for some time now, I'll see if I can make that over the next couple weeks; that'll cover what I believe is good structure within a club and what aspects can make or break a club.

~but appearently I'm fairly new to creating groups or clubs.
Everyone starts sometime

~Any kind of information regarding this subject would be very much appriciated
Well, I can certainly outline the stuff I've learned over the past two years of running ~teentitans and other clubs. Are you trying to start up the club now and convert it to a group when groups are released or are you going to wait until groups are released to create one directly through the new system? If you are undecided, I would suggest creating one after the groups system is released to minimize the hassle of converting it over from a club to a group (submissions, members, possibly even favs depending on how you handle submissions...), I think your group would run smoother in the long run if you started with a group as your foundation rather than a club and then having to switch over your operating procedures once the new system is released... plus it gives you more time to think about how you want your group to operate

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheMangaPit In reply to parallellogic [2009-10-27 22:49:59 +0000 UTC]

Wow, that was a lot of info to review (but lovin' ever last bit of it ), but I know have some sort of idea of where I could start.

I think I'm going to go on and take your advice and wait for the groups to be released, and avoid further complication of having everything converted . Is DeviantArt still going to release the groups in early next year, or is there going to be some sort of delay (I read part of your last journal and caught something regarding the group release )?


Ok, now onto the group planning (this is still in the brainstorming stages)

Naming Group: I've thought about calling my group name Fusion Star. To me it sounds catchy for a group that will be focused on collaborations . And in the line below the group name use the slogan me and a friend of mine came up with back in 2005, The Outer Boundaries Of Imagination.... I think that when artist do collaborations and mix up different medias of art, the possibilities really are endless .

Hype For Group In my poll the results turned out thus far 85% for starting the group , and the last 15% didn't know what would be the point of creating the group . 85 percent is a good figure, but I need to know if people would be seriously wanting to participate instead of just saying it's a good idea. I already have one collaboration project finished which I spent 3 months working on that has 9 other deviant artists involved (mostly watchers), to show how far the possibilities could really go even sticking to one theme (went a little off topic here ). I currently have a secondary account which I only use one month out of the year, and I figured maybe if I post a couple collaborations on that page (disabling 's, comments, and downloads, because it'll only be for promotion until the group is offically started). Also briefing my watchers on information as to why starting this group would be a good idea, etc. would at least give deviants some kind of heads up that the group is going to be launched but is still under construction (if that makes any kind of sense )

About Submissions, Affiliations, Members & Such Since I'll be the founder of this group, I would choose to have all deviants bring their submissions to me to be approved for posting (that way the club doesn't have posts that are not relating to what the group is focused on). And I've put some heavy thought into how the affiliation ranks would work. I figured the best way way to climb the ranks in the group would be through the number of collaborations they're involved in (haven't made a set amount yet). The only question I would have with this idea is how to plan out the waiting list for collaborations ? I want the group to have an organization style set-up as well (this would make a lot of things easier for me as the founder). Things such as Translators, Avatar Creators, Proof Readers (for very formal announcement perhaps ), References (for club info & such), Etc. Since you know quite a bit about clubs & groups and have really good leads, how would you mind if I added you as a reference? Not only that, I also think you're response time to messages is increadable (I've looked over other messages you've answered, and you're pretty quick on that. I hope I would be able to list these things under group members ?

I know this barely scratches the surface of the things I needed to look into, but at least I have some ideas out there to work with. If you have anything I could add to improve this idea, I'm always accepting ideas (and I know of anyone better to ask anyways ). Thanks a lot for taking the time to read all this (darn, this took over 2 hrs. to type but oh well )

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

parallellogic In reply to TheMangaPit [2009-10-28 02:00:21 +0000 UTC]

~Is DeviantArt still going to release the groups in early next year, or is there going to be some sort of delay
Haven't a clue, they haven't made *any* indication as to when groups will be released, only their mantra of "soon". Everything I post is speculative based on what I've seen and heard from the programmers working on #devBUG

~fusionstar has already been taken, and groups exist in the same set as users, so any name taken by a user account can't be used for a group and vice-versa (and you can't make a chat room with the name of a user or group that currently exists).

~To me it sounds catchy for a group that will be focused on collaborations
This may not apply to your group as much, but if you can choose a name that people will randomly guess (like ~teentitans for example) you may have an easier time of establishing your club.group on dA.

~I think that when artist do collaborations and mix up different medias of art, the possibilities really are endless
That sounds good, but when it comes down to running a club, the issue is how much time you can put into it, not so much how appealing it is. Granted you will likely spend some time hyping it initially (at least I would strongly suggest that to get the group going, like by making a forum thread in the new users forum once your group is created to attract members), but there is a lot more effort going into running a club than you realize from the surface. Though that really applies only to clubs, groups are *much* easier to run from what I've seen (as they've been designed to be easier), so time commitment probably won't be as much a concern for you as it is for club owners.

~Hype For Group In my poll the results turned out thus far 85% for starting the group
Forgive me, but I believe dA's polling system means very little for how much support you will have for your group once it is created. Do you really think 85% of dA would support you in forming the group? I think you have a strong bias towards the positive because your watchers will support you in pretty much any endeavor you pursue, creating a group included. The only thing I would suggest in relation to your watchers would be to create a blog in your group a couple weeks after you've first formed your group (so when you have about 10 to 20 watchers/members) asking for your watchers to join your group. I'd caution you not to hassle your watchers by posting extra journals on your home account asking your watchers to join, I've seen a few people who go crazy trying to get every single one of their watchers to join their club and then abandoning their club because they did not consider the time commitment involved or could not get their club popular enough before they lost interest, again since groups are easier to operate, I suspect groups will be much more active and be supported a lot more once they are created (also because groups are hand chosen before they are allowed to be crated)

~disabling 's
Heh, I don't believe you can disable favs, that's been a constant thorn in the side of clubs for quite some time: getting hundreds of favs a month on club submissions rather than on the original deviations.

~I would choose to have all deviants bring their submissions to me to be approved for posting
If a submission is sent to your group once it is created, you can have it set so that you, as the founder, will be the only user who can approve it before it is sent to (or rejected from) the group's submissions.

~And I've put some heavy thought into how the affiliation ranks would work.
Yeah, although you may have spent a lot of time on this, I would strongly suggest starting out with something extremely simple to begin with. The actual structure of a group is still very vague and is subject to change. For free groups there is currently four levels: founder, co-founder, contributors and watchers, so as the founder, you will only have two levels to work with (and they are limited to 98 users between them [99 users in the top three: founder, co-founder, contributors as it stands currently]). I would suggest starting out with given watchers the ability to submit works (and you approve them before they go into the gallery) and just not using the other two categories (co-founders and contributors) since it is very demotivating as a user to be allowed in as a contributor and then being kicked out later when the limit is reached or because of a policy change.

~And I've put some heavy thought into how the affiliation ranks would work
There will be a new search engine released sometime after groups are released, the search engine will allow you to search for users as well as groups. There will also likely be a widget specifically for groups that allow groups to affiliate with other groups. I wouldn't suggest going too in-depth on affiliate ranks, keeping it simple allows for easy up-keep (so you aren't editing the same journal every day to make sure every group is active or something).

~The only question I would have with this idea is how to plan out the waiting list for collaborations
I would strongly urge you to remove any bottle-necks in your group's processes, the more deviations you can accept from more sources, the better. I'm not entirely sure what you mean by a waiting list, but I can tell you it's a hassle trying to contact one user at a time to tel them to start collaborating with another user. As a group founder, you should let the users come to you with projects and your job will be to post them in a central location where they can be easily found, I really don't think you should be directing people on what they can and can't work on. Perhaps it might be a good idea to provide a service to hook collaborators up with one another, but I wouldn't discourage people from working together if they desire to.

~how would you mind if I added you as a reference
Certainly. That reminds me, I think you should take a look at ~collaboration-club and design your club to either mimic what they do or to deviate from what they're doing because it sounds like you're doing something very similar to what they are doing

~I've looked over other messages you've answered, and you're pretty quick on that
Hehe, yeah I spend too much time on here.

~I hope I would be able to list these things under group members ?
Not quite sure what you mean by that.

~I know this barely scratches the surface of the things I needed to look into, but at least I have some ideas out there to work with.
Well, you're welcome to describe *all* your ideas if you would like, clubs/groups are my area of interest. Groups are as new to me as they are to everyone else, so I can't really make any solid suggestions about how to run groups other than from what I've learned from clubs and through #devBUG . I would certainly be glad to talk with you about the core concepts behind your club though

~If you have anything I could add to improve this idea, I'm always accepting ideas
If I may direct the conversation here, may I ask what your core concepts are behind your group? I presume your group will run based on submissions? So users will watch the group, hook up with other users through the listing your provide in the blog(s) and then collaborate with the other user until a finished product is made, at which point they will be able to submit the artwork through the group (which will entail you, the founder, approving it personally). What other services will you provide? Affiliates? That may be something as simple as a blog with a bunch of avatars that you accept all groups that apply (initially I would suggest searching out popular groups and affiliating with them, but in time people will likely find you and your group will acquire affiliates that way -- given that the old club affiliates system is maintained in the new group system). What will your group do with the favs? I would suggesting using the group feature and allow your watchers to suggest them from other users' galleries (subject to your approval)

I would strongly suggest making a very clear & precise rules blog (and I would direct you to ~VarietyClub as my prime example, that club incorporates pretty much all the suggestions I would ever say about clubs), and in the blog I would explain how you hook up users to make collabs and how to submit collabs. Also, you should explain that membership entails simply watching the group in the rules blog. Here you could also explain your procedure for accepting favs: you only want to see works suggested that were worked on by two or more users.

To me, that would be the core of your group based on what I've gatehred from what you've said thus far

~(darn, this took over 2 hrs. to type but oh well )
45 mins for the above

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheMangaPit In reply to TheMangaPit [2009-10-27 22:59:05 +0000 UTC]

I know I really need to do better proof reading of these messages before I hit send (found way too many mistakes for the record)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

parallellogic In reply to TheMangaPit [2009-10-28 02:03:36 +0000 UTC]

Heh, I don't proof read mine (I take too long typing them as it is, 45 mins for the last one) so that my free time is more efficient, I wouldn't think ill of anyone for a few oddly placed typos

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Wyrdling In reply to ??? [2009-10-18 16:34:37 +0000 UTC]

I don't know if this have been asked before, but you mention that the founder have the say over all the controls. But! I'm not the founder of the group which I control/own/is an admin for.
So, will I end up being the offical founder for the group once it's converted - and can that be changed?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

parallellogic In reply to Wyrdling [2009-10-18 18:35:40 +0000 UTC]

I'm not entirely sure how the conversions will occur. I know that the title of 'founder' is not fixed to the person who created the club, it's supposed to be for the person who created the group (the person who converted the club into a group, not the person who created the club).

I believe you will be able to take the position of founder if you are the person who converts the club into a group. I also believe there will be a method by which you can pass ownership of the group on to other users, but that is rather low on the programmer's priority list and likely won't be implemented for a while

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Wyrdling In reply to parallellogic [2009-10-19 21:21:10 +0000 UTC]

Ah, that makes sense. Thanks

By the way, do you know anything about the pricing issue? I've heard some rumors (claiming to be heard from $spyed himself) that the premium groups could cost as much as $1000 dollars per year. That's insane!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

parallellogic In reply to Wyrdling [2009-10-19 21:43:14 +0000 UTC]

[link] & [link] are the only rumors I know about, so the $1K seems to be the prevalent belief that the Pro groups will be priced at. Personally, I don't believe anyone (even companies with cash to burn) would go for that when Super groups are so close in functionality to Pro groups currently. Either dA is going to have to blow the doors out with some really stellar apps or they're going to need to lower the cost for Pro groups if they want anyone to go for it . There's been a considerable amount of change in the direction groups have been going, I wouldn't be surprised if they merged the two types of groups into one and just had it appeal to average users . I mean what's the point of pricing Super groups so normal users can access them, but not offer the Pro groups so that users can afford them; it's like they planned it out so that Super groups would be incentivised to upgrade to Pro groups, but the pricing wouldn't allow them to do so... idk, pricing is probably last on their list of things to do, they'll probably base it off of how their final product functions...

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

shelldevil In reply to parallellogic [2009-10-22 06:40:26 +0000 UTC]

Wow, them's some insane prices.
Im happy to pay for a subscription, but that, its just too much.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

parallellogic In reply to shelldevil [2009-10-22 07:26:45 +0000 UTC]

They are indeed. I believe these prices come from speculations from before they even coded the different group types, so I don't really think they reflect the current state of affairs. I think the member limits indicate that average users are supposed to desire, and thus eventually upgrade to, Pro groups, thus a company priced rate would not be appropriate. I really don't think they've made much headway in deciding prices, and unless they make some absolutely stellar changes, I think the prices will change substantially.

You're in #communityrelations , have they discussed anything technical in the back rooms there?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

shelldevil In reply to parallellogic [2009-10-22 07:42:43 +0000 UTC]

I agree, unless there are some really excellent features, the prices will change, because noone in their right mind will pay that much for something they consider to be sub-par. I know I sure as heck wouldn't and I certainly wouldn't impose the costs onto my members.

Nah nothing to do with groups as such. The best bet for group info is #devBUG but even then, its not really technical. I really wish they would come out with some more info on everything, even if it is only a basic guideline of what to expect.

Having already converted my club to a group, I would be sorely disappoint if it didn't live up to my expectations and as we know, once you convert theres no going back. If I was stuck paying insane prices id be most upset. My group is all about pimping stock and resources, we used to rely heavily on features in journals. Being a basic group renders us unable to do this, so Im eager to upgrade should the cost be lowered

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

parallellogic In reply to shelldevil [2009-10-24 06:56:57 +0000 UTC]

~some more info on everything, even if it is only a basic guideline of what to expect.
Yeah, I wouldn't mind seeing all the options they plan on exploring, or have explored and tossed aside. I really get the impression we haven't seen the last of groupies, and the fact you can't run a private group (one where contributors are hand approved rather than all approved via the watchers area) properly under this system makes me think they have some large changes remaining.

~I would be sorely disappoint if it didn't live up to my expectations
Heh, I wasn't really thinking of it that way; I was hoping I could convince them to let me run one group, but now that I think about it, I like having the option to keep the club running the way it is. I think it *is* a very high price to pay though: continuing to handle submissions by "hand" (I've had a program doing it from day one, but it still takes several hours of my time each week to update the clubs) when groups can handle submissions so smoothly but you have less control over how the group is run.

~My group is all about pimping stock and resources
Ah yes, and you commented on the addition to devSEARCH to handle stock/resource searches. I've actually been thinking of cutting that off from devSEARCH and just developing it as its own idea, both because dA is making their own official user search engine and because I'm more likely to complete a smaller project than a larger one

~we used to rely heavily on features in journals
But the journals just changed to Blogs, can't it still be used more-or-less in the same way?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

shelldevil In reply to parallellogic [2009-10-24 07:10:39 +0000 UTC]

~But the journals just changed to Blogs, can't it still be used more-or-less in the same way?

Well they can, if we were more then a basic account, being basic we cant use thumbs in the blogs, so the point of a journal feature is void. We're now relying on news articles as a way of featuring and promoting. I also miss the absence of CSS, it was useful for creating boxes for the info we needed, specific features and links to other important stuff. In order to get these functions back we'd have to upgrade, and right now thats looking like a costly venture. I also really miss the inclusion of groupies, searching thru 500+ watchers to find stock accounts is troublesome, so we've had to revert back to "note us to get on the list" :sigh:

Ohh yes, the idea of making it separate for stock would be neat, and I agree smaller projects tend to get finished faster, at least I know thats how I work

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

parallellogic In reply to shelldevil [2009-10-24 07:47:32 +0000 UTC]

~being basic we cant use thumbs in the blogs
They took your sub away when they converted the group? Or did it expire and there's no way to get one now?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>